What law is that?

What rule is that?

When Ross Perou ran in the 1992 presential race he was afforded Secret Service protection. Had Biden been a strong president Russia would not have invaded Ukraine. After the Afghanistan pull out fiasco which proved how inept Biden is, was a green light for Russia, Chiina and North Kroea to do what ever they want. Biden is too old and seniel to stand trial he is too seniel to be president. Our enemies know this. Trump didn't weaken Nato, he wants then to pay their funding conmmient. After the Ukraine war is over who do you think is going to get stuck rebuilding Ukraine, the US.

I Russia there is no one election ballots but Putin. That is what Biden is attempting. He is doing everything he can to keep everyone else of the ballot but him. He won't even give secret service protection to Robert Kennedy, and is doing everything he can do to keep him off the ballot. There is and old saying keep your friends close and your enemies closer. It because of the weakness of Biden that Russia invaded the Ukraine and the Chinese are threating Twain. Biden took the sanctions off Iran and gave them their money and as a result Iran funded HAMAs and The Hudie's that are attacking shipping in the Red Sea. Biden doesn't keep our enemies close he just takes money from them though Hunter.

He got the bond limit lowered to 175 million or so and a 10 day extension.

@LJS9502_basic: Science has proven plenty of it. Religions were born around natural occurring events like the weather, stars, etc. And just because we don't know something yet, doesn't mean we have to fill the knowledge gap with "faith" or religion.

@mrbojangles25: I agree with the view mentioned by jag85 that its a topic that should be separated in to individual issues.

But I don't like when people mention topics like "Wanting women to have equal rights, access to home loans, the right to vote," it feels like a strawman argument and it makes it hard to try to bring up other individual topics that I find unfair about current feminism, since it paints opinions different than feminism as extremist.

This also relates to my previous comment as using an historical view to justify current policy, even if the current situation is completely different from the past.