@balrogbane I haven't played the game on PS3 so I can't say how the original story is, but for a new console it is a remaster, so it shouldn't be valued as well. So I guess a 8 is fair.
@ggregd It is an excuse, wether it's a valid enough reason or not it's another matter. Hopefully truth will come out and the proverbial heads will roll.
@cam2345 @charlesswann But at this moment is the far west. Just look at this, the ex-S.T.A.L.K.E.R developers/staff/people who happened to live nearby fighting over which project is the true spiritual successor to said game, and many other weird cases.
I almost pledged for "hearth forth, alicia" and "Darkest dungeon", but no matter how nice they seem, can't get past the whole uncertainty it projects.
@cam2345 @MasterTheHero Legally probably not (unless they signed a sponsorship contract, which at least in Spain would oblige them to compensate the failings of their product), but I hope we all agree that morally is plain wrong.
@gledster2000 It's not an investment (in an investment you get money), it's a way to A) fund a project you feel close to you for whatever reason; and B) a way to get exclusive merchandise or a good price IF said project gets funded.
If the funding is succesful, you are very entitled to get the product you just financed.
@alexspencer9 As lovely as your passionate defense of these youtube video creators (long term!) is, the sad truth is that they promoted the kickstarter and acknowledged it as an official product. Thus, it seems morally correct to assume part of the guilt over its canning (since they used their fanbase to fund it).
They give TUG keys? very nice, but if you support a project, it's natural to want that project to succeed, or getting your money back in money form.
And that's forgetting the various pledge goals which will go null, and which a TUG key won't repay.
You may like it or you may not, but this deserves a very public answer from the, it seems, snake oil vendors.
Karlinel's comments