@simon1812 @Copianames @TigusVidiks @JunglemanchiId @helborhamy - You are assuming i'm fickle and require everything at Max settings constantly for the whole cycle of a console. I don't. Please don't talk to me like I'm a moron. I would be very happy with a game on minimum as it still outperforms the console version most of the time. My current PC still plays everything on max and I would be very happy if I had to go down to high, medium, low. You are assuming you know me and you really don't. Enjoy your console :)
@ThAdEa82 - Sorry but you are completely wrong. Also, I like building them and even make money building them for people like yourself that can't learn how to do it cheaply.
£35 ? Does Microsoft actually want to fail? That is an absolute embarrassment. I had a talk on here with a guy and I was claiming that the fee would probably be about $10 or £8. If this is the fee you pay when buying a used game then it obviously forces you into buying the game new, many people can't do that and Microsoft lose. Unbelievable.
@TigusVidiks - How will they market them this time though? They can't market 360 and PS3 games on the new ones as "HD Classics" since they are already HD games. I think a lot of people would rather keep their old consoles rather than buy the same games for a high price on the new ones.
@TigusVidiks - Oh and I'm a fool that built one much cheaper than that. For shame.
If you wander into a shop clueless and ask for a top PC then you deserve to be charged $2000 for it. I have no stability issues and can play anything I want and it was far cheaper than £1300.
Oh and if we are going down the route of adding screen cost then surely anyone that owns a giant TV for playing console games has paid more than most PC users?
JunglemanchiId's comments