Jacanuk's forum posts

#1 Posted by Jacanuk (4235 posts) -
#2 Edited by Jacanuk (4235 posts) -

the tech looks cool and all (outside of the bullet holes, which show off the lighting just fine but look weird on glass), but it seems like most of these effects should be pretty standard on ps4/xb1 hardware.

There is no way in anything you will see these kinds of graphics on the ps4 or x1.

you might see some of it but that video was done on a pc with top of the line hardware.

#3 Posted by Jacanuk (4235 posts) -

@Jacanuk said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

@Jacanuk said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

What do you think of it? I think it looks awesome

Fool me once shame on you , Fool me twice shame on me.

So nah Ubisoft your awesomely high-end spec-pc graphics won't fool me again.

Come with Watch Dogs and have it be the same graphics as was shown in most of the trailers and we can talk about this game, until then "nice pre-render ubisoft" but please come with some actual footage.

i think all the recent Ubi games look really good like AC IV and Far Cry 3

They do but did you see the lastest Watch Dogs ingame footage compared to the first... there is a quite a huge difference.

So this look awesome but its also done on a very high end pc prerendered so i wont get excited until i see actual gameplay footage and if its like this :)

I am not a graphics whore, so i don't really care if it is downgraded. It's always going to look best on PC anyways

Me neither, im all about the gameplay/story.

But good graphics is not bad, so wont get all excited for this when i know its pre-rendered and running a pc so highend that no normal person would have it in their home :)

#4 Posted by Jacanuk (4235 posts) -

Wow is is really that old now.

20 years

I remember i had so much fun with this game.

#5 Posted by Jacanuk (4235 posts) -

@Jacanuk said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

What do you think of it? I think it looks awesome

Fool me once shame on you , Fool me twice shame on me.

So nah Ubisoft your awesomely high-end spec-pc graphics won't fool me again.

Come with Watch Dogs and have it be the same graphics as was shown in most of the trailers and we can talk about this game, until then "nice pre-render ubisoft" but please come with some actual footage.

i think all the recent Ubi games look really good like AC IV and Far Cry 3

They do but did you see the lastest Watch Dogs ingame footage compared to the first... there is a quite a huge difference.

So this look awesome but its also done on a very high end pc prerendered so i wont get excited until i see actual gameplay footage and if its like this :)

#6 Posted by Jacanuk (4235 posts) -

What do you think of it? I think it looks awesome

Fool me once shame on you , Fool me twice shame on me.

So nah Ubisoft your awesomely high-end spec-pc graphics won't fool me again.

Come with Watch Dogs and have it be the same graphics as was shown in most of the trailers and we can talk about this game, until then "nice pre-render ubisoft" but please come with some actual footage.

#7 Posted by Jacanuk (4235 posts) -

@Jacanuk said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

@Jacanuk said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

So damn, VGX happend. Thoughts?

Not good

And it was a waste of time.

i am almost 2 hours in, and it's not that impressive

Its amazing you lasted that long :) but it gets worse.

yeah i saw the whole thing, and damn, He constantly interrupts and does stupid comments through the entire thing... What a douche

hehe darn you sat through it all, i was unfortunately one of the live viewers so couldn't turn it off or fast forward, but it was an absolute nightmare and if i were a dev i would put VgX in my blackbook. Or at least make sure that they didn't approve this and all they said was "ok, do a bit of improv"

#8 Posted by Jacanuk (4235 posts) -

@juradai said:

@Jacanuk: That doesn't make sense. You say on one hand they deserve better than a 5th rate comedian and then on the other you state they are just the guys in the spotlight. Which is it?

Also, on my viewing of the show I saw many times that the development companies themselves recognized the efforts of the entire team involved in the game that won an award. Naughty Dog being just one example. The guys that appeared on VGX were the brains behind many of the creations currently in production and therefore were being asked about the progress of said projects, although with Joel McHale's interruptions it was difficult to deduce much of anything.

You missed the "Even" meaning that on one hand yes they are just one of many, but they are still a part of making something great and that is enjoyed by a lot of gamers, so they still deserve better than Joel Mchale.

And i didn´t say anything about the companies themselves didn´t recognize the team behind.

#9 Posted by Jacanuk (4235 posts) -

@juradai said:

@Jacanuk: "they are only devs..."

Care to clarify what you mean by this? They are only devs? These devs are video game's version of actors and directors. The creative force behind what you and I indulge in. I'm not trying to be a jerk here but the beginning of your statement initially downplays their contributions.

Those devs are just the guys in the spotlight. Anyone know how much a AAA game takes to develop today and its not just those 2-3-4 who made the game what it is.

So pointing 2 or 3 our like they are something special is just stupid.

#10 Posted by Jacanuk (4235 posts) -

Yeah, implying only 'casuals' bought the Wii is pretty ridiculous. Everyone at some point had a Wii.

It gets a ridiculous amount of hate these days with practically everyone on gaming forums looking down their nose at the Wii but if you were gaming from 2006 to 2010 you still bought one. And It had some fantastic games.

who implies that only casual gamers bought a Wii? i think the sales alone disproves that theory multiple times.

And i still enjoy the Wii today, it had some great fun games on it.