Jacanuk's forum posts

#1 Posted by Jacanuk (4200 posts) -

@MirkoS77 said:

@Jacanuk said:

@MirkoS77 said:

Graphics always matter.

Utter and complete nonsense.

Graphics doesnt matter to alot of gamers, graphics might matter to you and thats a shame because you are losing out on so many great games.

I've no trouble playing games with poor graphics, but they are always relevant in the sense that it helps make a good game even better. That's what I meant. You're telling me people would rather take poor visuals over good ones for the same game if given the choice?

Ahh ok.

Well, we can agree that graphics can improve a game, but thats not the same as say they matter. The key here is that for me and others who say graphics doesn't matter , is that if a game is good its good, and we dont judge a game just because its not 60fps 1080P or Crysis reborn each time.

#2 Posted by Jacanuk (4200 posts) -

@Jacanuk said:

@The_Last_Ride said:

@marcheegsr said:

Meh. Its just a number. What do you rate it? That's all that should matter.

Yeah that's true, but i am going to use the same argument i used for the GTA V review. They get paid to do it and they're not consistent. When games in the same genre don't get labaled as the turds they are, yet good games get labaled bad is something that this site has been suffering from for years.

I am going to enjoy the game whatever the score is because i like it. So in the end that's what should matter

This is wrong on so many levels, first how can anyone be consistent in stating their opinion about different products? Destiny is not COD and COD is not Destiny and each game gets reviewed on their own merits not after some checklist that in the end gives out complete identical reviews and scores.

Also Ride you know reviews are subjective so just because you like it and think its good doesn't mean anyone else needs to think the same thing and sales-figures doesn't make a game better or worse.

And you should be glad it wasn't the guy who reviewed Dead Rising 3 because then Destiny would have gotten a 2.

It would never have gotten a 2, because it's not broken. the reviews should follow a checklist. Because they're only opinions instead of doing analysis of the game

Neither is Dead Rising 3.

And of course reviewers shouldn´t follow a checklist, they are critics after all and get paid for their opinion.

#3 Posted by Jacanuk (4200 posts) -

@Jacanuk said:

@SovietsUnited said:

Bad move by Microsoft

Why was that a bad move? i actually think despite the price its a very intelligent purchase. The popularity of Minecraft is insane and considering just how much it has sold in pocket, MS has a sure win on their hands for their future smartphones and tablets.

Not to mention that for Minecraft its actually not a bad move if Microsoft sends some proper coders in and get the basic coding away from Java. Because its pretty insane how much difference it does, try minecraft pocket ed. and then try the pc version.

I think they overpaid, nothing more

I might be wrong but I believe game is well beyond its heyday

Ya, Ms overpaid 100% i dont think anyone will disagree with that.

But the purchase itself was a good call by Microsoft, they now have a hugely popular game and the brand itself is well known.

#4 Posted by Jacanuk (4200 posts) -

@Jacanuk said:

@FoxbatAlpha said:

What troubles me is they could have just bought Sony for $2 billion.

Nice troll comment.

I am sorry if you are offended by trolling in SW. So very fucking sorry.

Who said i was offended?

Also did you miss the "nice"

#5 Posted by Jacanuk (4200 posts) -

@MirkoS77 said:

Graphics always matter.

Utter and complete nonsense.

Graphics doesnt matter to alot of gamers, graphics might matter to you and thats a shame because you are losing out on so many great games.

#6 Posted by Jacanuk (4200 posts) -

Haha Microsoft is so stupid. The only thing that made Minecraft awesome was Notch. Without him they have an empty office with nothing for $2.5 billion. I almost feel bad for Microsoft, they are such a trainwreck. I used to invest in them years ago, but after they released the Xbox I pulled out and I'm so glad I did.

You do know right that pretty much since just before release Notch havent been involved in the day to day Minecraft development, and that after his leaving, they had to rewrite 1million line of code.

So no Minecraft is suddenly not Notch also the idea is clearly taken from Lego.

#7 Posted by Jacanuk (4200 posts) -

What troubles me is they could have just bought Sony for $2 billion.

Nice troll comment.

#8 Posted by Jacanuk (4200 posts) -

@Jacanuk: Wow! I agree, I don't blame Notch at all. I believe minecraft will last longer because of this. Microsoft is not going to invest $2.5 billion to watch it fail.

Ya i know Microsoft might seem like the big bad guy here and of course its going change something but if they remove the bad Java coding this will actually benefit everyone and not just modders.

#9 Edited by Jacanuk (4200 posts) -

Bad move by Microsoft

Why was that a bad move? i actually think despite the price its a very intelligent purchase. The popularity of Minecraft is insane and considering just how much it has sold in pocket, MS has a sure win on their hands for their future smartphones and tablets.

Not to mention that for Minecraft its actually not a bad move if Microsoft sends some proper coders in and get the basic coding away from Java. Because its pretty insane how much difference it does, try minecraft pocket ed. and then try the pc version.

#10 Posted by Jacanuk (4200 posts) -

So did the sale finalize?

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/microsoft-confirms-2-5bn-minecraft-acquisition/1100-6422326/

Yep and who can blame notch i didn't know he owned that much of the company , damn 1.75billion$ goes direct to Notch and he will leave Mojang together with the co-founder.