So you are disagreeing with the constitution?

Good to know, I thought you had done a pledge to uphold it?

I hope that keeps you warm at night Matt. Because we are not talking about carrots dying here.

and nice MEME of Bad Excuse, because the state could not have thought for themselves right?

Also

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/02/us/politics/trump-super-bowl-interview-coronavirus.html

Funny, how Trump had to DEFEND barring travelers from China, sure it was not enough, but the democrats and your side did not say "it´s not enough" you called it a bad move

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/31/business/china-travel-coronavirus.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=Article

So keep up pretending that this is all on Trump.

And I already linked to my proof of the facts.

And i have not seen you link one thing ever.

And as I pointed out, Trump can only do federal sanctions, which he did on the 12th where he blocked travel from EU and other hot-zones as one of the first.

Trump addressed the U.S. from the Oval Office in a prepared speech, striking a more somber tone and telling Americans to be "very, very careful."

Which btw, was condemned by all democrats and some experts, which just makes it even more puzzling since clearly that is the way to go.

But experts noted that the virus is already spreading across the United States, meaning that stopping travel from Europe, while possibly marginally helpful, is far from the most urgent need.

And again

President Donald Trump has the biggest megaphone, but it's governors and local officials who will decide what type of restrictions to impose on their citizens to try to slow the spread of the coronavirus. The Constitution largely gives states the authority to regulate their own affairs.

Considering Texas is a hardcore AOC supporter, it would go without saying.

Hope you are ok and you either got to vote by mail-in or stayed safe while voting.

But the law does not care about what is the most reasonable, beside the already made extensions, there is no legal reason or should be a legal reason for voting after the actual election was held.

People had a chance to vote until the 7th and the request for a mail-in ballot was extended from the 2nd until the 7th by two extensions. So people could receive a ballot by the 7th and mail it at the 7th, and still, be counted.

So while I agree that in these times the election should have been postponed until June/July or when it was safe, I will never agree that the law should be broken and the foundation of democracy should be destroyed by allowing for votes to be cast and counted after the actual election.

You keep disregarding facts and the constitution?

But i will be happy to point out the truth here

https://www.forbes.com/sites/sergeiklebnikov/2020/03/28/cuomo-new-york-quarantine-would-be-federal-declaration-of-war/#31fd77f02292

https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2020/04/01/us/politics/ap-virus-outbreak-shutdown-qa-1st-ld-writethru.html

President Donald Trump has the biggest megaphone, but it's governors and local officials who will decide what type of restrictions to impose on their citizens to try to slow the spread of the coronavirus. The Constitution largely gives states the authority to regulate their own affairs.

Prove it.

Trust me on this Texas, as much as you can be certain of your love for AOC, you can be certain that Biden will win the presidency.

Of course they did, they stand to gain the most of illegals being able to vote.

Which is why California is among the first to legalize "voter fraud".