OK really. Do we have to do this again. Ok here is the way it is. The graphics depend on the developer of the game. Games that are on both consoles. The gameplay might suffer a little when a game is developed for the 360. When it is ported over to the ps3 you have to deal with the cell processor. Developers become lazy when it comes to porting. So far. Namco, 2K Games dice, Konami, The people who developed burnout and Square enix. There games look better on the ps3 because they develop most of there games on the PS3 first then port there games to the 360. And it is the exact same effect. the 360 version has some trouble. Now given this. Namco has come out and said that they will put tekken 6 on the 360 to make fans happy. But the price. They said the PS3 version will be the best because they have developed the game to run on the ps3s power. They said the 360 can not handle it so they have to dum the game down to work. Square said Final fantasy will always be the best on Playstation cause they have a good partnership and that they want there big games to be on the best console. They would know. Kojima said that the 360 would ruin his game ( Metal gear solid 4). And he said I dont plan to make My game for that inferior system and Zone of enders 3 will be on ps3 and it will be one of the best games. Bio shock looked better on ps3 cause 2k took the time to really play around with the ps3. So it is all the the developer. Right now the best developer Microsoft has is Rare. And I personally think rare needs to be a Nintendo only game company.