I used to keep my PC updated. But I've gotten too far behind now. It'd cost me $1500 to be able to run the new stuff now. Since most stuff comes out on 360 anyway, I'll just stick with that.

@ Cheesehead9099 Because people get pissy when someone bashes their console. On one of the other comparison articles I said the PS3 was harder to program for and got thumbs downed 10 times. It's stupid really.

It's really amazing how similar the graphics on both systems are. But I think the 360 has the advantage of shaper detail on it's textures and more stable frames per second. But the PS3 is a very powerful system, I think that it lags behind slighty due to the Cell being difficult to program for, which costs developers more money. Edit: Thumbs down 10 times! You PS3 fans unbelievable. I didn't even say anything bad about the PS3. I'd say it's potentially more powerful than the 360. It's just difficult to program for with the Cell. The PS2 was the same way with the GPU (had 16 pipelines that were difficult to keep filled). It's not a knock, it's just true.