Vonderhaar's comments follow a statement from Treyarch studio head Mark Lamia, who said in May that he is aware fans want a "better-looking" Call of Duty game. He claimed that the studio did not need to build an all-new engine to achieve this, but rather continue to tweak the existing engine to offer new features, like lighting advancements,...
 This is where they F'd up..  it's gonna be the same old crappy engine.  clunky movement and blocky graphics.. BO2 will just have a bit of polish on it that should have been in the first release, but they had to rush it out and let the buyers be the beta testers.Â
 I for one will not pay for this over priced Old game... sorry Treyarch.. but as much money as your company made on the first one.. we expected alot more .. but I guess your condo and BMW payments were taking up all the R&D money,
 COME ON  ARMA III  !!!
zsavage1
Wait bringing up a 3 month old thread to make a pointless argument? Crappy engine?? Oh come on. MW3 is runs on a heavily modified Quake 3 engine also known as the MW3 engine. Maybe you should watch some video as the game looks fantastic and runs at 60fps.
Log in to comment