People did play the beta only a few weeks ago, and I doubt the game changed a lot in that time frame... lots of people of put enough time into this game to know if it's worth it.
To OP, I wasn't sure if the game had single player, and my only incentive to buy it was because of that. I played the game during the beta and I thought it was similar to Call of Duty (match making/general feel of combat), but with Mechs. I liked the movement mechanics (for both), and I'm not against heavy deathmatch-influenced games (which is pretty much the definition of Call of Duty - fast, run and gun, all for yourself usually), but I feel Battlefield 4 does more, on the whole, with less restrictions (basically, it's more tactical, since maps are larger, more open, and there are vehicles). I also didn't like that games were 6v6 in Titan Fall (vs 64 max for BF4), regardless if there are a bunch of npc soldiers running around to make it feel "epic". Maybe that will change in the future, specifically for PC, but I kind of doubt it, since people could have done the same thing for Modern Warfare 3, but didn't (Modern Warfare 2 had servers, Modern Warfare 3 went to matchmaking instead).
I dunno. I think if you're bored of Ghost, or any of the other Call of Duty games, and don't have Battlefield 4, I would recommend that or Titan Fall if you're looking to mix things up. They provide different styles of gameplay, and that's not a bad thing. I would play Titan Fall if I was in the mood for Call of Duty, but these days I'm leaning more towards Battlefield.
And, for the record, I never played Battlefield 3. During that time, I was playing Modern Warfare and Black Ops 1 (but not Black Ops 2). Before that, it was 2142 and World at War, so I don't necessarily consider myself bias towards one niche game versus another - they just play differently, and sometimes one appeals to me more than the other at the moment.
Log in to comment