Q&A: Meier on revolutionizing Colonization

Firaxis' oft-honored game designer discusses the surprise revival of his New World conquest sim, Civilization: Revolution going gold, and PS3 keyboard support.

This week, PC gamers got a surprise treat when 2K Games made a surprise announcement it would release Civilization IV: Colonization this fall. The unexpected news pleased fans of the 1995 original, which put players in charge of a European power vying for control of the Americas during the colonial era. It also assuaged some fears that game designer Sid Meier, the mind behind Civilization and Colonization, had not forsaken the PC platform for the current crop of consoles.

The reason behind many PC gamers' trepidation can be summed up in two words: Civilization Revolution. Having already gone gold for the Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, and Nintendo DS, the game will bring Meier's celebrated "god game" turn-based strategy to consoles the first time since Civilization II shipped for the original PlayStation in 1998.

However, the game has raised eyebrows among the keyboard-and-mouse set ever since Meier began touting it as being designed from the ground up for use with a console controller. Civ Rev will also allegedly have a much shorter playing time than its home-computer-based counterparts, which boasted gameplay so lengthy and addicting that it prompted the creation of tongue-in-cheek support group Civilization Anonymous. (The organization's Web site is now a viral marketing tool for the game.)

With the Civilization IV: Colonization announcement still in the air and Civilization Revolution's July 8 launch less than a month away, GameSpot caught up with Meier to ask him about the Colonization redux, the status of the on-hold Wii edition of Civilization Revolution, and how one gets in the Guinness World Records for winning the most game awards.

GS: So, Colonization... Hardly anyone saw that coming. What inspired you to take that on next?

SM: We've received lots of fan requests over the years to bring back Colonization. It's actually one of our most requested games. The opportunity to build a new Colonization using the Civilization IV engine was really exciting, so we decided now was the right time to make the game.

GS: Why did you decided to release Colonization as a stand-alone game, not a Civ IV expansion?

SM: Colonization is in the Civ IV family of games because it's a total conversion of the Civ IV engine and we wanted Civ IV fans to know that this is a game they'd really enjoy. Civ expansions have always required the core game in order to be able to play them, and they have always included significant improvements and additions to the core game. The dev team felt that Beyond the Sword (the second expansion pack for Civ IV) delivered so many improvements and additions to the core game that we had arrived at the ultimate Civ IV experience.

We decided to focus all of our efforts on creating a new Colonization experience that would build on the Civ IV engine and deliver the addictive "just-one-more-turn" gameplay our fans enjoy. We made it a stand-alone game because there are no core game additions to Civ IV included and it doesn't rely on any Civ IV game assets, so there was no reason to require the core game to play.

GS: What improvements over Civ IV are you introducing in the game?

SM: The biggest upgrades are the major enhancements to the interface and the graphics. We're completely redesigning the in-game interfaces from the city screen to the main screen, which will result in a completely new look and improved functionality. We've also increased game performance by removing some code from the Civ IV engine that wasn't being used, since Colonization is a very different game than Civilization. Colonization delivers completely new graphics, along with enhanced water, new unit shadows, updated terrain and city buildings, and a higher resolution on all assets to give them a more crisp and defined look. In fact, we're making so many enhancements to the graphics that the game will require video cards that support Shader 1.1.

GS: Are there any plans to continue the Colonization franchise after this release?

SM: No plans yet, but if the fans want more...

GS: So how did you find out that you were going to be in the Book of World Records?

SM: I found out when I read it in the news! It's really cool--never dreamed I'd be in the Guinness Book of World Records!

GS: I noticed the announcement did not mention exactly how many awards you have won. So, how many awards have you won?

SM: I have no idea. The awards all mean a lot to me, but I've never sat down to add them up.

GS: Have you ever turned an honor down?

SM: There have been a few times when folks have offered me an award under the condition that I come to a trade show or event to accept it. When I'm in the thick of a development cycle it's not always possible to leave for a few days to go to an awards show. I'm still honored that they wanted to give me the award, but understand if they renege because I can't be there to accept it.

GS: Since games are a collaborative effort, do you think it's unfair that a single person to be recognized for a product many have contributed to?

SM: Making a game is certainly a team effort and I feel strongly that any award I receive is something to be shared with the great teams I've worked with over the years. As the designer of the game I guess I'm designated as the point person and selected as the person to accept the award.

GS: Now when Civilization Revolution was announced, many PC gamers called it borderline heresy to create a "console-optimized" Civ game. How do you respond to accusations that this is "dumbed-down Civ?"

SM: It's not a "dumbed-down" Civ. I say that as the designer and lead programmer knowing that our goal was to bring the full experience of Civ to consoles and feeling very confident that we've done that successfully. I also say that with confidence based on the feedback we've received from longtime Civ PC fans who've spent time playing Civ Revolution and declared that it's really fun, addictive, and not at all dumbed down.

GS: How does the console-optimized version of Civilization Revolution differ from the PC versions?

SM: The term "console-optimized" doesn't really do this game justice. We started from scratch with Civilization Revolution and built the game from the ground up for the Xbox 360, PS3, and DS. It gave us a great opportunity to take all of the elements that have made Civ on the PC so successful and build that experience specifically for the consoles and DS, taking advantage of the many cool things those platforms offer.

Anyone familiar with Civ on the PC will immediately feel at home with Civ Revolution. The core game is the same on all three platforms--we adjusted the presentation and controls to fit each machine. So, the main differences between Civ PC and Civ Revolution lie in the presentation (the graphics are up-close, highly detailed and fully animated on the consoles, and custom made for the DS) and the controls (we found that the commands are a natural fit on the console controllers and DS gamepad and stylus).

GS: What was the biggest change in gameplay you made to adapt this game to consoles?

SM: The biggest gameplay change is speed. Civ PC games can take multiple hours to complete, but games of Civilization Revolution will be finished in a few hours or less. You'll still experience all of the goodness that is Civ and the whole sweep of time from the Stone Age to the Space Age, but you can complete a game in an evening--and then have time to play again!

We feel very confident that Civ Revolution is the answer to strategy on consoles and think the design approach we've taken with the game will deliver a compelling new experience to console and DS players that they'll really enjoy.

We've also built the most competitive multiplayer experience ever delivered in a Civ game, lots of extra content that will be available on XBL and PSN after the game ships, and we're offering the "Game of the Week" in which we'll provide a new game each week for people to play and then post their best scores online so we can declare "The World's Best Civ Player"!

GS: What was the biggest challenge in brining a keyboard-centric game to consoles?

SM: Actually, we discovered that mapping the game commands to a controller was easier than we anticipated. Since Civilization is a turn-based game we didn't have to sacrifice any of the depth--the game will wait for you to make your decisions, so we can still offer lots of interesting choices to players on every turn. As always, the depth comes from the way all of the individual decisions add up to create something epic.

GS: Will the PS3 version feature keyboard support? If not, why not, since the console supports USB keyboard input?

SM: I suppose it will, but to tell you the truth, I haven't tried that. We feel that the best experience for players will come from using the native controllers for each platform--that's how we designed the game to be played.

GS: How will the PS3 and 360 versions differ from the DS version?

SM: All three versions of Civ Revolution have the same core gameplay. The differences lie in the controls and graphics (the graphics are 2D on the DS to fit the platform specs).

GS: Does the DS have enough power to bring the full civilization experience, complete with technology trees, military conflict, and infrastructure construction? How much more limited will it be compared to the console editions?

SM: The DS version of Civ Revolution is the same game as the console versions, with 2D graphics. The only thing we couldn't include on the DS is the in-game Civilopedia, due to space limitations. We've heard from some Civ PC fans that a mobile version of Civ is a dream come true--and could possibly ruin their lives.

GS: How is the game coming along?

SM: We're finished with development and waiting for the game to hit the store shelves.

GS: So what is the status of the Wii version of Civilization Revolution?

SM: We're still in the process of making decisions on that and will keep you posted.

GS: Have you decided on your next project after Civ Rev?

SM: Yes, and that's all I'm allowed to say right now.

GS: I think the biggest question people have is whether or not you will return to the PC Civilization games after Civ Rev. Will you?

SM: We intend to continue to develop games for the PC as well as consoles and handhelds. We want our games played on whatever platforms will deliver a fun experience for players--and the PC is definitely one of those platforms.

89 Comments

  • badlands27

    Posted Oct 4, 2008 3:57 pm PT

    Lovin' Civ Rev on the PS3...can't wait for the next one to come out!

  • Caer_Death

    Posted Jul 30, 2008 3:35 pm PT

    The DS version is cool (portable Civ gameplay ^.^), but... it doesn't really have any music. Lame, and only, complaint, but after playing that, there's no way I could resist the thought of picking up Colonization on the PC! Who knows, there might even be a Colonization Revolution someday!

  • kayne2000

    Posted Jul 10, 2008 10:59 pm PT

    colonization 2 after 14 years really has me excited and it came out in 1994 not 1995 at least im pretty sure it did lol

  • sc_ajk29

    Posted Jul 8, 2008 2:31 pm PT

    I hope the next project is Civ5...

  • hsedai

    Posted Jun 21, 2008 7:18 pm PT

    very nice interview. After playing a few of the civilization games, I've wondered what was the impetus of his building technique. Sid is certainly one of the original masters of his trade.

  • Adam_the_Nerd

    Posted Jun 21, 2008 12:58 pm PT

    Civ looked really boring, but it's super addicting and fun!

  • Anofalye

    Posted Jun 19, 2008 12:56 pm PT

    I want it NOW!

  • 21kid

    Posted Jun 17, 2008 8:39 pm PT

    I loved Civilization II and I'm not a PC gamer, but, why would I want a game that could be beaten in a couple of hours? I played the demo and almost beat it in the short amount of time they give you. Not a good idea in my book. I'm very dissapointed.

  • Pablo620

    Posted Jun 16, 2008 7:16 pm PT

    Its a fun game but like speed racer all im capable of doing, all i seem to ever think about is MGS4

  • mickwounds

    Posted Jun 16, 2008 5:49 pm PT

    Civ Rev is out here in Australia and ive been playing in heaps on 360. I'm loving it. Whats good is you can build one city and finish a game in around an hour or you can take your time, build multiple cities and games will last 3 or more hours. As soon as i finish a game i start again with a diff Civ and try to finish it a different way. Its very addictive. The core gameplay is all there and it reminds me of Civ 2 in a lot of ways. Of course its not as deep as Civ 4 but thats what they were going for.

  • thorsen-ink GameSpot staff member

    Posted Jun 16, 2008 2:07 pm PT

    grayoldwolf

    How about a new Alpha Centauri, Sid? That would make you even more pimptacular than you already are.
    ____
    EA owns the AC license, so no dice there.

  • ganon546

    Posted Jun 16, 2008 2:06 pm PT

    I played the demo for this on XBL and it was so freaking fun lol! It was sad to see the demo end though after a certain amount of turns

  • ShadoweaverCode

    Posted Jun 16, 2008 11:44 am PT

    "Will the PS3 version feature keyboard support? If not, why not, since the console supports USB keyboard input? "

    Umm, Tor, why is this question focused around the PS3? You do know that the 360 can also use USB keyboards right?

    Although I don't think we will need the keyboard support, developers have been doing a fantastic job using the 360 controller for other RTS games so I imagine this wouldn't be any different.

  • ocdog45

    Posted Jun 16, 2008 10:44 am PT

    ps3 version will be better d2 the keyboard support

  • Thornorway

    Posted Jun 16, 2008 8:53 am PT

    Yes, you are the best gamedeveloper in history Sid, not only cause of your excellent civilisation games but also the spinoff Alpha Centauri and other classic games like pirates and such. I would definately get CIV V when it comes out

  • Sins-of-Mosin

    Posted Jun 16, 2008 8:30 am PT

    If the DS version is as good as the demo I played on the 360, I might never actually do work at work ever again!

  • Underdog01032

    Posted Jun 16, 2008 7:58 am PT

    I completely agree with a new Alpha Centauri, I played that game all the time but can't get it to run anymore.That would be epic.

  • thk123

    Posted Jun 16, 2008 5:31 am PT

    First off, I would love a new SMAC, that remains one of my fav games. Also, I may not be a die hard Civ fan, (Civ 4 was my first) but that is largely due to my age. However, I think Civ Rev is fantastic. Yes it is simplified, but it is a great stepping stone. Although, whoever came up with those advisors should be shot. So annoying!

  • djtim_3000

    Posted Jun 15, 2008 10:48 pm PT

    @andante79 "If I was to decide how CIV V would be..."
    Judging by your incredibly misinformed post, I'm extremely happy you have no say in how Civ5 is going to turn out. Are you sure you've even played Civ4 more than once? (And you call yourself a Civ fan).

  • grayoldwolf

    Posted Jun 15, 2008 10:28 pm PT

    How about a new Alpha Centauri, Sid? That would make you even more pimptacular than you already are.

advertisement

Game Stats

Games you may like…

Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.

See More Similar Games