Posted Jun 29, 2009 11:53 pm PT

this is what they got they deserve this, making crappy games
particularly jumper, jumper costed 60 dollars when it releases, ironically it immdiately dropped to 10 dollars after two and a half months

i never played jumper b4, but somehow i got interested after i saw tons of review criticizing jumper, i might play tht game when the price reduce to 3 bucks or even lower, i want to know by myself how awful this game is

• agree 0
• disagree 0
• = 0
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted Nov 8, 2008 4:39 pm PT

i feel sorry for the people who bought those crappy games..probably little kids. imagine getting only one christmas present and it's 'space chimps'..
millions wasted.... all that money could have fed starving children yet it was spent on TRASH, that isn't selling.

• agree 1
• disagree 0
• = +1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted May 29, 2008 8:18 am PT

Meet the next Uwe Ball lol reversed. Instead of making aweful movies adapted from games, he's going to make bad games adapted from movies. Guess what it's such a long and beaten down path that very rarely does a game adaptation get rated above average. It's taken Star Wars a number of tries until they started churning out good games, with the exception of the X-wing/Tie fighter games which were quite good.

I guess someone was going to choose this line of work, good luck with it and I hope beyond hope your products raise the bar for movie adapted games market.

• agree 0
• disagree 0
• = 0
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted May 28, 2008 5:41 am PT

Well thats what you get when you make crap games. How can you make a game out of SAW? thats so stupid. 300 seems alright but no comment on there Chipmonks and Jumper games. They need to open there eyes to what people want or just make there games better.

• agree 1
• disagree 0
• = +1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted May 28, 2008 12:05 am PT

Its not that games based on movies are bad. They can be good if they are allowed to develop at their own pace. Trying to release a game along side a movie is what cause these games downfall. If the game Jumper was based on the Novel and not the movie it could have been a great game. As for Alvin and the Chipmunks. They really should have known better. Look at the disney or Pixar games that come out every year. They don't rack in high sales either. I guess some people aren't meant to lead.

• agree 1
• disagree 0
• = +1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted May 27, 2008 9:23 am PT

That's what happens when you try to do only Licensed games. You end up making nothing but crappy games that don't sell well. Why? Because there is too much bureaucracy that hinders that development of a licensed game. Therefore you are too restricted in what you can do and the license ends up holding the game back from being any good.

If you want to make it doing only licensed games, then you need to have a different way of getting things done. You need to spend 2+ years on each game in order to push towards something worthwhile that will return a profit.

• agree 1
• disagree 0
• = +1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted May 24, 2008 3:33 pm PT

I would assume third rate studios go through this crap all the time, but if GS brought this to our attention, then apparently not.

• agree 1
• disagree 0
• = +1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted May 24, 2008 12:43 pm PT

Making a developing company that focuses on movie licenses is like selling poop as candy and wondering why people won't buy it. Sure a few people get desperate enough to try it but once word gets out it's over. The only reason Chipmunks sold as much as it sold is because parents bought it for their children only knowing the name was The Chipmunks, oh the kids liked the movie I'm sure they like the game, then money gets thrown away.

• agree 1
• disagree 0
• = +1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted May 23, 2008 11:52 pm PT

Well of COURSE your games haven't done as well as you'd like em to! They're licensed games based on Jumper and Alvin And The Chipmunks!!!! Do I even need to say DUH?

• agree 1
• disagree 0
• = +1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted May 23, 2008 3:13 pm PT

well those games were horrible, cmon if they expect to make it they have to make better matieral...but thats also hard to do with movie and book games because they have to meet a deadline to coincide for movie realeases...if you ask me they already dug there grave taking on the task of movie and media games

• agree 1
• disagree 0
• = +1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted May 23, 2008 12:41 pm PT

well he surely gives in to easy.

• agree 2
• disagree 0
• = +2
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted May 23, 2008 12:04 pm PT

Good for him. After all, who wants to work on projects based on someone else's projects?

• agree 3
• disagree 1
• = +2
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted May 23, 2008 11:35 am PT

What does it matter knowing what Brash is? What you need to know is the game. Many casual gamer do not know rackstar but they know GTA and that is what matter.
What i think is that those 2 movies are not part of a long standind series nor are they cult movies so i believe the mistake was in purchasing those licenses.
It would be great to think that gamers got finally smart and will not buy crappy movies-tie in games but we all know that is an illusion.

• agree 3
• disagree 2
• = +1
• Sign in to rate this comment

Posted May 23, 2008 10:18 am PT

I think the problem is very few people know what brash is. Hell I dont know what Brash is.

• agree 3
• disagree 1
• = +2
• Sign in to rate this comment