Posted Mar 24, 2009 5:43 pm PT

champmanfan i was just pointing out the top cards. you're right a 260 would be fine

• agree 0
• disagree 0
• = 0
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Feb 16, 2009 6:37 pm PT

@Joefatty2x4
An Nvidia 260GTX is better on price than 280/295 and still performs well on Crysis. Later on you can add another 260 in SLI when games are more demanding.
Otherwise just play in DX9, still looks great.

• agree 1
• disagree 0
• = +1
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Jan 20, 2009 3:16 pm PT

either get a 4850, or a GTX 280/295, all three work wonders. and vista 64 would help as well

• agree 3
• disagree 0
• = +3
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Dec 23, 2008 4:32 pm PT

please help me,i'm stuck in icy cold level rescuing prophet from frezzeing.show me the way out

• agree 0
• disagree 4
• = -4
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Nov 21, 2008 5:39 pm PT

holy rage problems-lolz maybe you should cool off man and go beat ur wife or something instead of taking ur rage out here

• agree 0
• disagree 3
• = -3
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Oct 23, 2008 1:41 am PT

it doesn't need any patch for more performance it need avery high performance in your pc such as vga card 8800GTX or8800GTS or higher ang 2g of rams
and cpu core 2due at least 2.3/4

• agree 4
• disagree 1
• = +3
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Oct 18, 2008 9:47 am PT

Stop posting comments like "I got 10000 mhz cpu and 132165 gb ram but it still runs like sh*t on my pc!". No one gives a sh*t about how it runs on your lame computer. If you wanna play nice, go buy a 4850 and shut up.

• agree 1
• disagree 7
• = -6
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Oct 6, 2008 2:16 pm PT

so is it worth updating?? i see people get a lot of problems with the patches... im still on 1.0, should i download 1.1, 1.2 or just let it be?? haha

• agree 0
• disagree 4
• = -4
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Jun 26, 2008 3:48 am PT

thanks you for downloads

• agree 0
• disagree 0
• = 0
• Login to rate this comment

Posted May 15, 2008 9:17 pm PT

If u want to patch crysis please buy the original not the pireted.

• agree 5
• disagree 1
• = +4
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Apr 12, 2008 3:31 am PT

Damn i have a Pentium 4 3.4 OC to 4.0 (socket 47 2 gigs ddr-400 ram and a x1950 512mb (agp) with wireless xbox360 controller and i can run with medium/high settings with no lag except maybe a lil lil bit in intense action parts of game..point is i can run this game with my old school azz system so those of you who cant run it shouldnt have to upgrade much....anyways this patch did help i did notice a lil more better performance.

• agree 1
• disagree 8
• = -7
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Apr 12, 2008 3:31 am PT

Damn i have a Pentium 4 3.4 OC to 4.0 (socket47 2 gigs ddr-400 ram and a x1950 512mb (agp) with wireless xbox360 controller and i can run with medium/high settings with no lag except maybe a lil lil bit in intense action parts of game..point is i can run this game with my old school azz system so those of you who cant run it shouldnt have to upgrade much....anyways this patch did help i did notice a lil more better performance.

• agree 0
• disagree 7
• = -7
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Apr 11, 2008 6:09 pm PT

i have 4 gig ram, Q6600 Quad Core 2 overclocked to 3.2GHz and my two 8800GT graphics card giving me 1gig memory. on vista with direct x 10 i can run the game everything on very high settings with very minor and rare lag....

• agree 0
• disagree 6
• = -6
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Mar 25, 2008 4:54 pm PT

hey buzzard101 the blue screen could be becuase u need new software for your ramstiks, or your overloading them! try getting new software or new ramsticks preferably a bigger size e.g 4gb! and get DDR2's der da better ones! bt depends on your motherboard! i hope i helped ya




buzzard101

Everytime i start playing everything is going well then i get the blue screen of death. But sometimes it doesnt happen at all. I ave a 512MB nvidia 7300 GT, 2 Mb ram and a core duo. Anyone no what could help?

• agree 1
• disagree 0
• = +1
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Mar 21, 2008 9:40 pm PT

whats the deal with the blur man?

• agree 0
• disagree 0
• = 0
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Mar 20, 2008 6:25 pm PT

Game runs perfect now after this new patch, Ive notice a big diffrence in the motion blur.

• agree 0
• disagree 0
• = 0
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Mar 4, 2008 11:18 pm PT

My game ran nearly perfectly smooth with all settings on high w/o aa with one gig of ddr2 8500 1066 ram with my q6600 and ati hd2900. It only crashed every once in a long while. Now with 2 gigs it is more perfect. dx9 on win xp

• agree 1
• disagree 1
• = 0
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Feb 20, 2008 12:54 am PT

[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]

• agree 0
• disagree 7
• = -7
• Login to rate this comment

Posted Feb 19, 2008 10:19 pm PT

have a 2.2 dual core 4200+ 3 gigs ram 520v psu BFG 8800 gts oc 640bm. Game ran not to ok on dx10 with all settings very high AA off. after patch was able to make playable @ same settings. Have overclocked my GC to 600/821 and now works very ok with 2x AA. Go figure, Should have just overclocked to begin with. This game uses gpu alot more than cpu.

• agree 1
• disagree 1
• = 0
• Login to rate this comment