anyone remeber Too Human? (you will be s ...
System Wars is a forum to discuss platforms (Welcome and Information thread). The Terms Of Use agreement should be followed at all times. If you find abuse that does not follow this agreement, or the additional guidelines mentioned in the READ BEFORE POSTING sticky thread, please report the content as abuse.
WARNING! More than 5 quotes in a post, trolling and posting in an account suicide thread will result in a moderation, and a possible suspension on your account; flaming equals an automatic 7 day suspension. In addition, discussion about Downgraders, Emulators, Flash Cards, ROMs and Homebrew can also lead to a suspension or the possibility of permanent ban.
- Oct 19, 2009 6:51 am PTRevolution316 wrote:
halo reach the biggest game in 2010? GT5 is the biggest game. GT5 is the most expensive game ever made. 60 mil. and it will sell more then reach
how much do you think MS payed for that franchise and dev. cost of the first game? (its a trilogy with too human 2 probably comming outaround 2011 unless E3 says otherwise)
20 million? 30 million? 80 million dollars were payed by MS. it only sold a little over half a million copies thats about 25 million dollars profit. the next too human is in Dev. hell with its only hope really hanging on "MS give us another chance."
do you think the game deserves another chance?
http://www.xboxist.com/xbox-360/news/the-fate-of-too-human-sequel-hangs-in-the-balance-009788.php
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 6:53 am PT
I wonder where are they taking the 80 millions from.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 6:54 am PTPSN ID : Craig1122
Why would people buy the second one if they didn't buy the first one? yes I know they could buy the first one if they were really interested in the second but how many people are going to do that?
If it made money for MS , then they wouldn't be so hung up on giving the go ahead for the sequel.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 6:56 am PT
Why are you assuming all $80 million was covered by MS?- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 6:56 am PT
PSN ID: Reule / Gamertag: Xire Reule/MGO ID: Reule (Alt: Reine)
As much as the first one wasn't all that great, I say give them a second chance. There's always been surprising results. It worked for Killzone 2.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 6:57 am PT
I'd very much like to see Too Human Too.
I do think S.K. can and will do much better with the sequel, also I'm one of the few it seems who thought the first one was better then what GS scored it.
I'd very much like to see Too Human Too. :P
I do think S.K. can and will do much better with the sequel, also I'm one of the few it seems who thought the first one was better then what GS scored it.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 6:58 am PT
---
There's no time to be rational or diplomatic. I'd rather have it wild like National Geographic.
Sounds like what happened to the first Killzone. If the dev can get their act together, then there may still be a sequel.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 7:01 am PT
Why are you linking us to an article that is 9 months old? Most of this information we already know.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- [QUOTE="IronBass"]
I wonder where are they taking the 80 millions from.
[/QUOTE] From all the revenues they get by charging for Xbox Live Gold- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 7:16 am PT
Call me a loony, but I actually kinda liked the first one. I still play online co op sometimes.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 8:07 am PTApparently I need a sig for people to read my posts.Sequels are routinely better in video games. Sure, the first TH was an abhorrent pile of junk, but the second one could well deliver on the promise of the original. Look at Killzone and Killzone 2. I don't know if I believe that $80 million was spent on that game. I don't see how it's even remotely possible. Also if $80 million was spent developing the game, and it sold 500,000 copies @ $60 each it would have lost a considerable amount of money, it certainly wouldn't have seen "about 25 million dollars profit". I call BS on the whole thing.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 8:18 am PT
[QUOTE="MangaJugs"]
Call me a loony, but I actually kinda liked the first one. I still play online co op sometimes.
[/QUOTE]
You are not alone. Despite it's flaws, it was nowhere near as bad as the interwebz made it out to be. There is a solid foundation to build upon from what the first one started and to say it cannot be done is folly. Just look at Killzone 2 as a recent example. If Guerrilla Games can do it, Silicon Knights sure as hell can.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 8:26 am PT
_________________________________
There is an actual possibility of combining fanboyism with logic and reason.
im pretty sure the trilogy is cancelled due to the 1st one flopping
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 8:40 am PThey i'm still playing the first one
i just started a new character on it
Owner of an 05 Xbox 360 and an 02 PS2current gamerscore: 21856
Muse > You
hey i'm still playing the first one :( i just started a new character on it- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 9:18 am PT[QUOTE="akira2465"]
Why would people buy the second one if they didn't buy the first one? yes I know they could buy the first one if they were really interested in the second but how many people are going to do that?
If it made money for MS , then they wouldn't be so hung up on giving the go ahead for the sequel.
[/QUOTE] What about Killzone1 ???- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 9:25 am PT
i actually thought it was a good game, not great but good, it deserves a sequel- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 10:28 am PT
[QUOTE="akira2465"]
Why would people buy the second one if they didn't buy the first one? yes I know they could buy the first one if they were really interested in the second but how many people are going to do that?
If it made money for MS , then they wouldn't be so hung up on giving the go ahead for the sequel.
[/QUOTE]
i'm going to buy it
i LOVED the first one...i didn't look at "oh ten years in development, it BETTER be good" cause the game we received wasn't in development for ten years, the game changed like 3 times completely...what we go was nothing like the first initial idea for the game and no one seems to realize that...they're just blinded with the word ten
ANYWAYS...yea i really liked the gameplay, story was meh...but the gameplay was just amazing IMO, walking through dungeons and just flying up to enemies faces and slashing them down, it was entertaining to say the least
a very solid 7/10 for me
the second can only get better i think
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 10:29 am PT
[QUOTE="badtaker"][QUOTE="akira2465"]
Why would people buy the second one if they didn't buy the first one? yes I know they could buy the first one if they were really interested in the second but how many people are going to do that?
If it made money for MS , then they wouldn't be so hung up on giving the go ahead for the sequel.
[/QUOTE] What about Killzone1 ???[/QUOTE]
very true
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 10:50 am PTSpruceCaboose wrote:Why are you assuming all $80 million was covered by MS?
Exactly....this game was only in the works for roughly 14 years.
Originally slated for the N64, moved to the Gamecube and then transferred over to the 360. [QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]Why are you assuming all $80 million was covered by MS?[/QUOTE] Exactly....this game was only in the works for roughly 14 years. :| Originally slated for the N64, moved to the Gamecube and then transferred over to the 360.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Oct 19, 2009 11:19 am PTNedemis wrote:Exactly....this game was only in the works for roughly 14 years.SpruceCaboose wrote:Why are you assuming all $80 million was covered by MS? Originally slated for the N64, moved to the Gamecube and then transferred over to the 360.
actually it was Ps1 then gamecube then MS decided tey wanted another Sci Fi RPG that wasn't Mass EffectRevolution316 wrote:halo reach the biggest game in 2010? GT5 is the biggest game. GT5 is the most expensive game ever made. 60 mil. and it will sell more then reach
[QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]Why are you assuming all $80 million was covered by MS?[/QUOTE] Exactly....this game was only in the works for roughly 14 years. :| Originally slated for the N64, moved to the Gamecube and then transferred over to the 360. [/QUOTE] actually it was Ps1 then gamecube then MS decided tey wanted another Sci Fi RPG that wasn't Mass Effect- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
