Resident Evil 6, Halo 4 win at Golden Reel Awards

@RondoMachete Everyone else clearly meaning 11 year old girls and frat boy retards and otherwise Stockholme Syndrome suffering fan-tards who don't have any respect for themselves that they continue to suck at the tit of increasingly terrible horrible Resident Evil games. RE6 was terrible at a level that defies comprehension . Even the worst games in history were better than RE6, like Cyberia or ET. It looks like utter dog shit on both PS3 and 360, it has worse graphics than RE5, the characters continue to show a minimum of development and a minimal amount of personality, the story is virtually  non-existent, the interface blows, the Skill system blows and they somehow managed to ruin the one thing that was always solid in RE4 and RE5 - gun customization. e.g there is none in RE6, and it plays like Operation Raccoon City. Not to mention, camera angles almost as bad as MG Rising Revengeance. The bosses were unimaginative and boring, and easy, Simmons was literally a 7 stage boss who made no sense, and they even ruined Ada's campaign with a patch that made it co-op. The enemies are just a mashed together re-hash of the last three games - it has enemies from Revelations in it, an attempt at zombies, more boring intelligent zombie soldiers who you can still massacre with melee (something that defined skill in RE1/2/3/CV - being able to win with a knife). The list goes on and on, and to top it all off, the best co-op (before Ada was co-op) campaign in the game is the one that is 100%% not survival horror - Chris.

@RondoMachete The game has many elements in it that go against good game design.

It isn't the worst game out there, but like CoD they don't do enough to deserve the sales they get while many amazing games go unrecognized and the developers go under.

@ChristysXmas @gantarat This is "Resident Evil" not a new IP get it through your head .. Can't you ever open your mind closed head and think about the fate of the Franchise for once of your life !

@Yalaa1 @Strider8009 No because they're wrong. Liking something is one thing, but people don't just say "I like it." They say "I liked it and it was a great game so I don't know what's wrong with you." That's a statement of fact. Unfortunately, the FACT is that RE6 blows dicks. In a 40 hour game, there were maybe 4 good hours. 10% is not a passing grade. And none of those hours include Mercs, mercs is by default good so it does not count at all.

@Yalaa1 @Strider8009 People who know how to interpret a user's post is called good reading comprehension, do you have that? Just because my post is something you clearly don't agree with doesn't mean you can jump the gun  and mis-interpret it.  

So, why did ignore the part that what Capcom did to RE6 was to milk as much money off of the RE name? You completely missed the point about how Capcom alienated fans and bastardized the series for money, not for quality  Capcom lowered their standards to get money off the RE name, and yet, you're okay with it. Only people with low self-esteem supports what Capcom is doing.   

I'd imagine you're some sort of weird anime fan or a Capcom fanboy. I have said that anime fans are the biggest whores of the video game community.  

@Yalaa1 @Strider8009 You do have a point, I'm sure out there somewhere there are ven those who defend Superman 64. There were definitely those who defended Duke Nukem Forever lmao.

@prestodaniel @Strider8009 So any criticism about what you like is not worth a damn, it that's what you implying? And "solid hackn' slash game" is a matter of opinion. 

Either you're trolling or you don't know the definition of logic.  

@dangermouse2k  @Chaos_Dante_456 @Yalaa1   Yeah, sure guys... I didn't say it was a good or bad game i just said good for Re6 it got an award but okay... 

Edit: Also, sure the game has it's flaws it's not even scary anymore but seeing some people defend the game sure means that it did something right maybe it's not your cup of tea but that doesn't mean developers should give up on being creative and try something different just because the fanboys and critics didn't like it's new vibe. 

BTW the features you mentioned are by no means innovative and have been in games for quite a while. Other games had contextual melee. HL2 introduced location-specific hit-points to replace hit-boxes, a decade ago. Every 3ps since 3ps became popular has had a good cover system. The only thing RE6 introduced that was actually good was the counter system, shooting while down (something that was in L4D but you are immobile in L4D), sliding, and healing your partner while reviving them. Those are good features but they don't excuse the fact that the game itself is boring and doesn't merit good features. The ONLY good thing about RE6 is the multiplayer and the single player mercs. Ada used to be the best campaign, the only good campaign, but they ruined that too by making it co-op which defeated the entire reason it was good in the first place.

None of that excuses the non-existent story, gigantic plot holes, loose ends, boring gameplay, boring and unintimidating enemies, almost pointless dialogue and cut-scenes, the hyperbolic silliness, the steps backward in gun upgrading, the terribly derivative enemy design, the CoD sequences, the forced and contrite annoying attempts to reference the old games, or the simply broken parts.