My Shepard lives in the end. Does that mean I get a different start in the next game? Will my choices in the first trilogy have an effect on events in the future? Will I be able to play one of the different species in the next game? And finally how do you top the reapers as an arch- enemy? These are questions I would like answered, but it appears as though it will be a long time before they are.
Studio rep says next game in series may not be set after or before Mass Effect 3, or even feature any of the same characters.
BioWare wants to make clear that the next entry in the Mass Effect series should not be known as Mass Effect 4. Writing on the BioWare forums (via Eurogamer), community developer Chris Priestly explained that the only confirmed detail about the new game is that it will not feature Commander Shepard.
"To call the next game Mass Effect 4 or ME4 is doing it a disservice and seems to cause a lot of confusion here," Priestly said.
"We have already said that the Commander Shepard trilogy is over and that the next game will not feature him/her. I see people saying, 'Well, they'll have to pick a canon ending.' No, because the game does not have to come after. Or before. Or off to the side. Or with characters you know. Or yaddayaddayadda. Wherever, whenever, whoever, etc. will all be revealed years down the road when we actually start talking about it."
Priestly added that a much more accurate way of thinking about the next Mass Effect game is "what happens next set in the Mass Effect universe." The developer said he expects fans to speculate as to content, character, and story, but nothing official will be announced for some time.
The next Mass Effect game was officially confirmed in November. It will run on the Frostbite game engine--the technology that powers DICE's Battlefield games, among others--and is said to be "very respectful" of the franchise's core pillars, though BioWare is pursuing new directions with regard to story and gameplay.
Whatever it may be, EA will end up messing everything anyway. Just let us hope for a new trilogy who can keep up with the logical but not obvious plot, and maybe i can start to care about ME again. Shep should have a very big statue on London, if not, you dont even need to touch that game.
It doesn't have to be a huge epic end of the world scenario...It could be about tracking down a mafia organization around the universe and bringing them down. They wouldn't even have to mention the previous story if they didn't want to. It will be it's own story.
What? If "the game does not have to come after. Or before. Or off to the side." of the events of Mass Effect, then is it just a Mass Effect Alternate Universe game?
I really really hope they don't go the "Prequel" direction with this. Yes, I realize they would have to "cannonize" one of the main ME3 endings..... but with a story that is centered around choices, and having those choices have a real, tangible impact on the universe, anything that comes before ME3, time-wise, seems small potatoes when compared to how the ME3 ending would alter all life as we know it.
It's like; why do I care if I get to fight Turians in the First Contact War if..... A) I already know how that conflict will turn out, regardless of whatever little things they will let me alter...... and B) Who cares, since the Catalyst will have such a huge impact relatively soon thereafter.
I absolutely LOVED the Mass Effect series..... it was basically one of the coolest sci-fi stories I've ever read/heard/consumed, but I was able to change major (and minor) parts of the story due to my actions. As a result of this, I almost feel as "Mass Effect 4" (or whatever they end up calling it) would HAVE to take into account all of the endings where the Reapers didn't end this cycle by killing/harvesting nearly all intelligent life. I dunno, to do otherwise would remove that which MADE Mass Effect such an amazing series by saying "Yeah I know you chose ending A, but we're canonizing Ending C, so we'll keep your other decisions but the REALLY, REALLY BIG ONE we'll just assume you chose differently."
I realize this would require a LOT of work on Bioware's part.... probably too much work to be able to feasibly make a game, but perhaps that means they should put the series on the shelf for now. I just don't see how a series that gave you choices that ACTUALLY MATTERED can just start a new trilogy without taking into account the games that came before. As I said, this would probably bring in too many variables to write script for (one solution they'll never use but that WOULD work: no voice acting; just written script) but anything else wouldn't be Mass Effect anymore. Then again, Dragon Age: Origins had greatly varying beginning stories based on your Class/Race selection.... maybe there could just be a different 5-10 hour beginning depending on your ME3 ending..... there IS something very close to precedent with DA: Origins...... (heh, I literally just thought of that as I was typing this). Just as I really didn't have a lot of interest in a story like Omega, knowing (or at least figuring) that it wouldn't drastically alter the main theme of ME3, a prequel to the ME Series just wouldn't really excite me very much. I'd rather live and die in the universe that I made all those tough choices to save in the first place. Wasn't that the whole point of saving it?
@CaptWaffleI like your comments but if you think carefully, they wouldn't have to place the game in the past or the present but it could perfectly be situated in the future, wether near or far away. One such as a milenia that has passed in which Shepard's story is now legend, then all the endings and choices you made could be feasible since the actual story could be "misplaced" or lost. OR, at the beginning of the game could take into account your save from ME3, again like it did in ME2 to ME3, and that way, even if the story of ME4 or wathever is called doesn't have anything to do with Shepard or the characters or even the timeline of the first trilogy, they could give all the players their same personal experience they've been giving us for all this time. For this reasons i believe that it wouldn't be necessary a cannon ending at all. Plaesa correct me if I'm wrong. Bye
I don't see how they will get around picking a canon ending if it's set after the events of ME3.
While the 3 endings were similar regarding colors, they all were vastly vastly different as far as consequences for the galaxy. Even if it was set 1000 years later, it would still be obvious which ending they chose or didn't choose. Do the reapers still exist? Does organic life exist? Answering those two questions can solidify which ending was "Canon"
The ending of the Trilogy is one discussion, but as for the mass effect universe, I loved it. The 3rd game really cemented this with its spectacular missions (again, not talking about the ending).
I would love to return to this universe, but Bioware would need to take a really creative approach in order to keep the life in the franchise.
How about a brand new sci-fi game? It doesn't have to tie into mass effect at all. New characters, new galaxy, new plot, new technologies, new gameplay mechanics. If calling it Mass Effect 4 is such a disservice, then a logical approach would be to not make another "Mass Effect" game. It doesn't mean it can't be another sci-fi genre. In fact, it may help those that were disappointed with how the mass effect series ended move on.
"BioWare wants to make clear that the next entry in the Mass Effect series should not be known as Mass Effect 4"
Thank GOD they're not gonna call it that...
a sequel would be quite interesting imo, just think about it... take the destroy ending as canon and add the indoctrination theory to it, shepard does not make it to the citadel, but survives the battle. then he/she realizes that the last 10 minutes of the game never happened! hahahaa, just thinking aloud :) i just want more mass effect...
Hey guy, as long as the ending doesn't make me feel like I did something wrong, you can call it whatever you want. Also, bring back the cool down for weapons...thermal clips are kinda dumb.
Can't see them using Mass Effect Universe either since all the Mass Relays exploded leaving a trail of Mass Murder/Genocide beyond, all technology mostly obliterated yadda yadda yadda.
I wish they would just move on and maybe DO CREATE something NEW.
Now that they have more games like ME2 and only one like ME1 I guess calling the first game Mass Effect is actually a bigger disservice. Waiting for a true sequel or franchise to pick up the concept and not turn it into a 3rd person shooter with dialog options.
Regardless of what the story is, or when it takes place, one thing I do think could add a lot to the experience is if they add the ability for players to choose from multiple races and backstories when they create their character, in the same manner they could in Dragon Age Origins. This would add a ton of replay value (although ME already had a lot as it is) and would make interacting with other races and characters far more interesting.
They don't need to include too many races, mind you. I reckon the four counsel races (Human, Assari, Turian and Salarians) would be enough, but having Krogans wouldn't hurt either (or would, for all your enemies).
@TenraiSenshi As much as I love the Krogans, I think they would be less interesting as lead characters than, say, Salarians. Salarian would be my choice all the way - the guilt of having to deal with the Genophage is my favorite side plot in the ME trilogy, and I'd love to play as Mordin (or someone, like him, directly involved in the Genophage).
This, DA3, TheWitcher3, Cyberpunk and Rome 2 TW are on my list even if the released dates aren't announced yet....
Man I do not even care. When I say that I mean that since ME3 crushed my favorite series, I will not take ME seriously in terms of choice and plot. I will still "try" the game like I did the new devil may cry. For giggles
You expect me to 'speculate' -- YEA! Why don't you call me when you have some real information. As if I'm going to waste my time on something that "...does not have to come after. Or before. Or off to the side. Or with characters you know. Or yaddayaddayadda. Wherever, whenever, whoever, etc". P!ss off and raise awareness for your game the NORMAL way. Not through the same method that brought ME3 and BioWare that awful notoriety.
I Love the Hell out of this Series, warts n' all. If they can provide a similar experience in the next Mass Effect chapter(s) count me in! :D
I personally still want to have faith in Bioware, but it is real hard lately to do that. They have made a lot of mistakes lately with DA2, ME3, and TOR. I liked ME3, but it is still my at least favorite game of the series. It is a good game. But it could have been so much more. Bioware just needs to find a way to get rid of EA and start over. EA/Bioware is not a good combo.
It will run on the Frostbite game engine--the technology that powers DICE's Battlefield games, among others--and is said to be "very respectful" of the franchise's core pillars, though BioWare is pursuing new directions with regard to story and gameplay.
so we get BF in ME universe?
I don't care what it is, I wont be buying it. ME3 was the end for me, failure, and I didn't buy it. Once Multiplayer comes to a franchise I drop it.
@DarthLod Mass Effect 3 only had NON-Campaign Co-op. That's a crap reason to NOT try the campaign out (-__-)
@DarthLod because you suck at competitive MP, I gather?!
@DarthLod Hmmm, don't like multiplayer, eh? Either you are seriously anti-social (in which case, why would you post a social comment) or you just seriously suck at games and can't stand being ashamed of yourself everytime you've played multiplayer.
BTW: ME3 was co-op online, not competitive. So does this change your story? Or are you also going to try to convince us that you don't do Co-op? I call bull's hit if you claim you refused to play either Contra or Borderlands (best ever co-op games, IMO)
@jasonlc3221 The term is asocial. If he was anti-social, he would be actively doing things against societal norms to piss off everyone. And what a glorious jump to conclusion to make regarding his distaste for MP. He doesn't enjoy playing what is essentially a tacked on Mass Effect horde mode and actually likes to play single player, so this suddenly makes him asocial? Begone with you, you judgmental idiocy-injected hypocrite. It's people like you who are the reason why we have "Facebook gaming" and Sony trying to implement more "social" tripe onto PS4, without actually caring about the games anymore. Deplorable.
@Fo_Fai Games are meant to be a fun time killer, aren't they after all? Competitiveness is not fun, it's an ego gamble. Some people don't like that. I for one, I work my ass off and feel good cause I was better than most at work.
A video game that requires me to do that very same thing for no actual prize to look forward to is not appealing to me. I like to take my time and relax, not rush my ass off just for the sake of pissing that 13 year old swear machine online.
@DarthLod same here
@DarthLod I have read a lot of illogical and irrational comments on this site, but this one is probably one of the worst I've ever seen.
@DarthLod Your loss. If you were truly invested in the storyline, and not looking for a self serving glory-fest... Yes the ending was questionable at best, but the game (as someone that bothered to play them all through with my choices, not the 'right' ones) I was brought to tears with the many deaths and choices that weren't able to be made... It was real and right and quite possibly my best gaming experience to date.
The ending was needed to end the series, there was a kinda choice in the ending, but Shepard needed to exit and be the legend that the trilogy was building him/her to be.
Bioware... how dare you make me not hate you... for a bit amyways...
@DarthLod So it doesn't matter if the multiplayer is good or if it doesn't detract from the single-player experience at all? You simply drop a franchise as soon as they introduce multiplayer? Seems an odd, arbitrary policy and you've likely missed out on a several good games because of it.
It's kind of hard to miss "good" games with multiplayer when every fucking game that has been released this gen has had an MP mode of some kind.
@Mariner32 @DarthLod MP clearly did detract from the vanilla unpatched version of ME 3, seeing as how you needed to play the multiplayer to get the "best" ending. This was of course, before they got called out the bullshit and Bioware changed it. So much for that argument of yours huh?
It won't take place after or before ME3. CONFIRMED. The game is all about quantum mechanics and pocket universes that exist outside time and space.
To be honest the ending of 3 ruined the trilogy so badly that it's a good thing the stories are completely unrelated.
Why wouldn't people call it Mass Effect 4 since it would be the 4th game in the series? It might be a disservice to call it a Mass Effect game period.
They are about to go so left with the Mass Effect name it isn't even going to be funny. I can feel it. If nothing has been made official why bother to try and control the conversation about it? What of people's expectations do they have to be afraid of? Is it because the game is going to be so completely and utterly unrecognizable like Dragon Age Origins 1 & 2?
Content you might like…
Users who looked at this article also looked at these content items.
Emmy-winning writer Jon Vitti, who penned "Mr. Plow" episode of The Simpsons, working on 2016 film based on Rovio's game. Full Story
- Posted May 20, 2013 12:23 pm PT
Bankrupt publisher hoping to bring in at least $22 million from upcoming asset auctions. Full Story
- Posted May 23, 2013 9:43 am PT
Network journalist acknowledges one-sided violent video game report; invitations to Bungie and the Entertainment Software Association were declined. Full Story
- Posted May 20, 2013 10:45 pm PT