Suit alleges publisher's executives improperly backdated stock options with the help of the company's audit committee.
Last week, Take-Two Interactive notified shareholders that the Securities and Exchange Commission was conducting an informal investigation into the company regarding some stock option grants it made in the past decade. Today, word emerged that an Activision shareholder has filed suit against the publisher in Los Angeles Superior Court over its own stock option grants.
The Activision suit, brought on behalf of the company by shareholder Ryan Vazquez, charges 16 current and former Activision senior executives with improperly adjusting their stock option grants to their own benefit and to the company's detriment.
The way most of the company's stock option grants work is that on the day grant is made, the employee receiving it gets the right to buy a limited amount of stock within a limited time frame at the low-bid price from that day. The suit alleges that Activision executives were issued these grants and then fudged the books to make the issuing dates occur when the stock was at a low point. As a result, the price the employees pay to turn those options into actual stock is much lower, and the company gets less money for those shares.
Vazquez alleges that an array of Activision executives, including CEO Robert Kotick, breached their obligations to their shareholders by regularly backdating stock options between 1995 and 2004. As evidence, Vazquez points to more than 80 stock option grants made to the defendants over that period of time and what kind of growth the stock price saw in the 10 days following the purported grant of options. In some of the instances the stock price went up a few percentage points over what the defendants could pay for it, but some grants were made just before the company experienced growth spurts. In one case, the stock jumped up to 147 percent of what the executive's stock option said he could purchase it for within 10 days of the grant being made.
The lawsuit claims that the "extraordinary pattern" of stock surges immediately after the option grants were made is due to the grants being backdated. Vazquez's complaint says the alleged backdating "improperly increased the value of the options to the officer defendants and improperly reduced the amounts they had to pay the company upon exercise of the options." As a result, Vazquez contends the defendants violated the terms of the stockholder-approved stock option plans, failed to recognize the extra compensation expenses, and lied to shareholders and the Securities and Exchange Commission to hide their actions.
Vazquez said the executives' actions cost the company millions of dollars in damages. On behalf of the company, Vazquez is demanding that the defendants pay for damages and legal costs, give up stocks and money gained from the contested options, and provide "equitable relief" for violating their duties to shareholders.
As of press time, Activision representatives had not returned requests for comment.
Actually if you look Activision is not getting sued. The company is sueing the 16 executives. The Activision suit, brought on behalf of the company by shareholder Ryan Vazquez, charges 16 current and former Activision senior executives with improperly adjusting their stock option grants to their own benefit, and to the company's detriment. Vazquez is acting as an agent of the company basically. As a stock holder he is acting in the company's interest, trying to recoup lost earnings due to the executives alledged dishonest actions. (and at the same time hopefully increase his own stock shares value).
I couldn't understand this shareholder news thing... I'm kinda confused! But still am sure they aint gonna get any probz!
All Actiivision needs to do is come out with another Pitfall and they recoop all the money the owe, and problem solved..lol.
Once again it would appear that this is a case of the rich getting richer on the backs of the average guy. *Sigh*
I hope they sell the rights to Marvel vs Capcon to pay this and the buyer actually makes a MxC sequel... *crosses fingers*
Serves them right, those asses are responsible for Call of Duty 3 not being on the PC. I hope Activision goes bankrupt.
The title is a bit misleading, the guy is suing execs, not Activision. Regardless, it's pretty pathetic really.
What amuses me is the whole railing about violating their duties to shareholders...overlooking the fact that since they bought the stock, they *are* shareholders...
Ok, apparently just another incident of the kind. Why are so many reading casting judgement now? The executives are only being "accused of" backdating their option trading. This is nothing compare to the major white-collar bust of the past 5 years.
Westly Snipes! I recall at least 2-3 months ago that Senators both Dem & Rep were getting "special options" grants even changing state laws to profit comps, and made a 24% increase on investments last year compared to Corporate Americas 12% and the average American investors 7%. Lord knows you'd all do it too if given the chance:)
Not surprising. It's estimated about a third of all North American companies have backdated options at some point. Just because it's Activision that's getting sued now doesn't make it news - just a symptom of a bigger scam.
Wow. That is some serious backdoor to "bump up" the stock value. Enron was much worse of a problem than Activision because they are trading energy. They were also not as sneaky as Activision. Energy companies pretty much rule the world.
Avalanche Studios co-founder says developer's ambition is for action, not moments that make players cry; steampunk-style game on hold. Full Story
- Posted May 15, 2013 6:33 am PT
4A Games creative director Andrew Prokhorov thanks Jason Rubin for telling the studio's story, but says, "We deserve the ratings we get." Full Story
- Posted May 16, 2013 12:44 pm PT