Sign on Options
Theme:

ATI Radeon HD 5570 and Radeon HD 5450

The Radeon HD 5570 and Radeon HD 5450 are the budget offerings of the lineup in every sense of the word.

ATI released two more budget-oriented Radeon 5000 series video cards. The Radeon HD 5570 and Radeon HD 5450 roll in at $80 to $85 and $50 to $60, respectively. You'll get all the usual Radeon HD 5000 series goodies--triple monitor support and DirectX11. Just don't count on any of the gaming horsepower to make an appearance.

The Specs:
Radeon HD 5570
650MHz core
400 stream processors
1GB 900MHz DDR3 RAM

Radeon HD 5450
650MHz Core
80 stream processors
512MB/1GB 800MHz DDR3/DDR2 RAM

At first glance, the Radeon HD 5570 seems like it might be a decent contender, but then we encounter the pesky DDR3 problem. The reduced memory bandwidth will nip any performance aspirations in the bud. The Radeon HD 5450, like just about any $50 GPU, gets carved down to the bone. With less than a one-fourth of the cores present on the Radeon HD 5570, it's all down hill.

On the plus side, these lean cards draw almost no power. The Radeon HD 5570 draws 38W and idles under 10W. If that seems low, the Radeon HD 5450 uses even less: 19W under load and 7W at idle. Their miniscule power consumption is also matched by their small physical size and low noise output. Both of the cards are half height, which helps them fit into tight cases. The Radeon HD 5450 doesn't even have a fan, so it's completely silent.

Putting the cards through the paces, we couldn't help but hope for better performance. The specs didn't inspire much, and the tests confirmed it. The 3DMark Vantage GPU score shows the Radeon HD 5670 to be five times faster than the Radeon HD 5450, and almost one-and-a-half times as fast as the Radeon HD 5570. Yes, the Radeon HD 5670 costs twice as much, but when we're down in the $50-to-$100 range, it really pays to save for an extra week or two to get something vastly better. Dirt 2 and Batman showed similar results. To even get Dirt 2 playable on the Radeon HD 5450, we had to set everything to ultra low and kick the resolution down to 1280x768. The Radeon HD 5570 fared slightly better, but it's hardly $20 away from the Radeon HD 5670 and GeForce 9800 GT. Unless your biggest concerns are power and space, do yourself a favor and move up the chain a bit.

12 Comments

  • Ladiesman17

    Posted Feb 25, 2010 8:45 am GMT

    PCs need more great games, if you (both ATI & NVidia) care to PC users, you should produce a good game for them... it's not balance, even PCs have good system available, it's not worth too much... if there's no massive & great titles available, at least you open "Exclusive-Developers" dedicated for PC-Only to persuade PC users & casual consumers.. BAAADDDD marketing strategy...

  • adamisherwood

    Posted Feb 18, 2010 11:05 am GMT

    Look quite good for less hardcore gamers who enjoy older games. They both appear to be half-profile which is good for people with slimline PCs, but they should do a more powerful, full sized card for about the same price...

  • nate22692

    Posted Feb 15, 2010 11:45 am GMT

    The 5570 might be good enough for some less demanding or older games(Orange Box, Call of Duty 4 maybe). Considering power usage and price they are pretty solid cards, but just not enough to make the latest games run with all the eyecandy turned on.

  • coaltango

    Posted Feb 14, 2010 4:51 pm GMT

    Why did gamespot even bother with this junk.
    guess sarju shah has nothing else important to do

  • robbie_sla

    Posted Feb 13, 2010 5:43 pm GMT

    my 9800gtx blew up last week :'(

  • rockzo

    Posted Feb 13, 2010 11:27 am GMT

    im suprised they even wasted time with an artical for these two cards. my anceint x1650xtx spanks both these cards and thats just sad.

  • syler4815162342

    Posted Feb 11, 2010 2:01 pm GMT

    Wow they are so great choice for some one who doesn't have lots of money to spend on a PC

  • artemis1990

    Posted Feb 10, 2010 10:52 am GMT

    got ur wrong sry man!

  • artemis1990

    Posted Feb 10, 2010 10:51 am GMT

    @skarmagr
    Thats a good one bro!
    But wouldnt be caught dead even bullying this stuff to tell u the truth!!

  • Skargamer

    Posted Feb 10, 2010 7:32 am GMT

    nothing beats 9800!!! besides the ones which are bound to come after it!

  • Skargamer

    Posted Feb 10, 2010 7:31 am GMT

    5450 is HUGE!!!!

  • metalkid9

    Posted Feb 10, 2010 12:27 am GMT

    Monster lol

Subscribe to GameSpot's YouTube Channel

Hot Stories

Newsmakers

Featured Stories

Submit News

Got tips? Send them in!