Federal court rules violent-game ban unconstitutional
US District Court of Seattle rules that a state law forbidding the sale of games showing violence against law enforcement officers violates the First Amendment.
The long story of the state of Washington's controversial law banning the sale of violent games to minors came to an end today--with an important victory for the game industry. Judge Robert Lasnik of the US District Court in Seattle ruled the law unconstitutional under the First Amendment's protection of freedom of speech.
Rejecting the state's argument that violence in games should fall under the state's obscenity law, Judge Lasnik noted that similar portrayals of violence can be seen in literature, art, and the media and that "there is no indication that such expressions have ever been excluded from the protections of the First Amendment."
Passed by the Washington state legislature in March 2003 and signed by Governor Gary Locke that May, law HB1009 was immediately challenged on the grounds that it was unconstitutional by the Interactive Digital Software Association (now the Entertainment Software Association) and was subsequently blocked by Judge Lasnik. The law sought to ban the sale of games that showed violence against law enforcement officers to anyone under the age of 17. Retailers caught breaking the law would be fined $500.
Addressing the state's concern that violence against police officers in games translates to violence in real life, Judge Lasnik determined that "the...belief that video games cause violence, particularly violence against law enforcement officers, is not based on reasonable inferences drawn from substantial evidence." He also pointed out that the definition of violence against law enforcement officers was impossibly vague, citing such examples as the possessed cops in Freedom Force, enemy officers in Splinter Cell, or games built around Looney Toons, The Simpsons, or The Dukes of Hazzard.
Doug Lowenstein, president of the ESA, praised the ruling, saying that it is just another example of a number of rulings "that establish video games as constitutionally protected forms of expression." Lowenstein added that he hopes Washington and other state governments will now focus on further implementing the ESA's self-regulating Entertainment Software Ratings Board (ESRB).
The Washington Retail Association, the Video Software Dealers Association, the Interactive Entertainment Merchants Association, the International Game Developers Association, Hollywood Video, and the ESA jointly filed the lawsuit.
Hot Stories
Newsmakers
-
World of Warcraft target of latest suit from PSN plaintiff
San Jose man adds Activision Blizzard to growing list of courtroom opponents, takes issue with MMOG fees, alleges ill effects on mental health, seeks $1 million. Full Story
- Posted Nov 24, 2009 4:58 pm PT
- 883 Comments
-
Top US Nintendo PR exec resigns
VP of corporate affairs Denis Kaigler leaves after less than two years at Nintendo of America; no replacement yet named. Full Story
- Posted Nov 23, 2009 4:26 pm PT
- 122 Comments
Featured Stories
-
Assassin's Creed II slays 1.6 million in one week
Ubisoft says internal sales reports shows critically lauded sequel outselling original by 32 percent. Full Story
- Posted Nov 24, 2009 9:22 am PT
- 319 Comments
-
Microsoft patents in-game guide system
Researcher's 2008 patent for "User-Powered Always Available Contextual Game Help" shows Microsoft is considering an in-game guide similar to that of New Super Mario Bros. Wii. Full Story
- Posted Nov 24, 2009 5:13 pm PT
- 283 Comments
-
2 million Xbox Live users Facebooked, a-Twitter
Microsoft announces around 10% of its subscribers log onto social networks during first week of 360 integration; 1 million check out Last.fm, 1.7 million peruse Zune video store. Full Story
- Posted Nov 24, 2009 11:27 am PT
- 149 Comments
-
Datel suing Microsoft over memory-unit lockout
British maker of high-capacity, low-price storage units takes legal action against software giant, accusing it of antitrust violation. Full Story
- Posted Nov 23, 2009 5:28 pm PT
- 534 Comments
-
Modern Warfare 2 classification appealed in Australia
South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson says game allows players to be "virtual terrorists;" Classification Board says no appeal has been received to date. Full Story
- Posted Nov 23, 2009 9:05 pm PT
- 293 Comments


1 Comments
Sign in / Sign up