Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»

If Hideo went with the origional ending...

Forum Actions
Thread locked

This topic is now read-only on GameSpot.
To post new messages, please visit GameFAQs and log in using the same email and password that you use on GameSpot.

  • Oct 28, 2012 5:47 pm GMT
    ...you know, where Snake and Otacon were to be arrested and executed for their 'crimes', how angry would you, and the fan base be?

    I don't know about you, but bad endings that kill you off or end on a bad note (and NOT be one of several endings) really anger me.

    I personally would feel insulted, much like the Mass Effect fans felt with the vanilia ending of Mass Effect 3; to have gone through several games of a deeply engaging story, where you develop a bond of some kind with the characters and then get 'rewarded' with an ending that says "Congratulations, you won the game and saved the world and didn't die from the final battle, or sacrifice yourself to save everyone...here is your reward, you are now going to...DIE!!!"

    Also, it makes no sense to me to have Snake and Otacon get killed. What were their 'crimes'? if it was the Tank Hanger incident from MGS2, then they're innocent...Ocelot was responsible for that, and from the plot, he planned it to manipulate the Patriots into carrying out the course of actions which led to their destruction, and the worlds freedom.

    As for saying "Snake was working (unintentionally) for the Patriots; well, so was Raiden and Rosemary, so was Meryl and her crew...so were the PMC's...so was Cambell, so were the entire UN governments. ALL of them were commiting 'crimes' (being controlled, or 'working for, the patriots) meaning that everyone would have to be executed....but to have only Snake and Otacon get executed and nobody else, despite what I just said, that's just.....stupid!

    It was a stupid, insulting idea for an ending and I'm glad that Hideo's entire crew refused that ending. I'm not accusing Hideo of anything other than asking him "why choose that ending? It opens up way too many plot holes and questions"

    Here are some more examples of bad endings to otherwise good or interesting games.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Jp039mLUPU

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxbZEeCGaBo&feature=relmfu

    So, who else thinks that the fans would riot, or demand a better ending if Hideo went with the 'you get executed' ending.
    ---
    "If Ripto were here, I'd give him a piece of my mind!" : Moneybags from Spyro 2
  • Oct 28, 2012 5:53 pm GMT
    Im just going to put it this way...

    the original ending is a hell of a lot better than the rubbish we eventually got.

    The original ending is something we would have gotten from Kojima at his prime when he was actually telling really good stories (debatable).
    ---
    Movie Review Blog: http://cruizd.blogspot.com
    Japan is so nice!

    Movie and Games review Blog:

    http://cruizd.blogspot.com

  • Oct 28, 2012 6:16 pm GMT
    So you want a ending where your character, who's been through so much chaos, and saved the world many times is executed as a 'criminal'?

    Geez, it would leave a bad taste in your mouth, similar to how "The Boss" was branded a traitor (by the 'patriots' who were under another name at the time), despite actually saving the world from Volgin, and this was something that Big Boss knew and was forced to keep secret. Then he turned on the corrupt government (and the 'patriots' who he origionally founded, but then realised was bad), and Zero (who took over the 'patriots') and was in turn 'killed' by his son (who was created by and then under orders by the then-unknown 'patriots'), who in turn is executed by the government (even though the 'patriots' are now no more)....Ack!

    I myself am happy they didn't use that ending. It would just seem....well, bad!

    ---
    "If Ripto were here, I'd give him a piece of my mind!" : Moneybags from Spyro 2
  •  
    Oct 28, 2012 8:51 pm GMT
    SPOILERS



    I would be pretty damn mad simply because humanity has shown multiple times in real life that they do not deserve any salvation for the most part.

    So why would I want such an ending in a piece of fiction that's meant to get me involved and entertained? With characters I like no less? It would be terrible to see Snake not only have a bad life, but through sheer ignorance be mistreated by masses of morons who don't realize what he did for them.

    I mean it would make Meryl's words in MGS1 "Don't give up on people." Worthless. And it would make Fortune's words in MGS2 hold water "Those ignorant masses that the Patriots control."

    If Snake had the original bad end that Kojima planned, then I fully support the next Metal Gear game to be about you playing the villain and purposely killing and mass murdering as many people as possible. Instead of Big Boss being the top rank, invent a Grim Reaper rank where you kill the most number of people. The game's plot could be about entirely about wiping out mankind because they prove they do not deserve any salvation and as such deserve to be punished.

    But that's just me, glad that the ending was changed.
  • Oct 28, 2012 9:27 pm GMT
    It would be so out of place. Snake and Otacon have never been about turning themselves in or they would have done it way sooner than that.
    ---
    Look a you.... sticking to the plan.
    didyouknowgaming.com
  • Oct 29, 2012 4:02 am GMT
    I guess I'm in the minority that always liked the fact that the public saw them as criminals. It added a vigilante-esque aspect to them.

    I do agree it wouldn't make sense with them giving themselves up- there could always be the threat of another Metal Gear somewhere- but I also think Snake should have died at the end of this game, so...
    ---
    PSN: CrimeRoyal
  • Oct 29, 2012 6:03 am GMT
    I actually think that an ending like that would have made a lot of sense, and more than everything else, a plot like that would have tackled a lot of important and delicate real life issues;
    The nature and definition of terrorism, death penalty and so on... It would have tackled important facts about our present world, and forced us, the players, to consider our own beliefs on the matter. No matter what those ideas are.

    And as for the fact that an ending like that would have made the game ending leave a bad taste, I agree, but I don't think that the aim of fiction works is to be consolatory and/or heart warming. It would simply reflect reality and the idea that unfortunately great ideals fail more often than they succeed.

    On a final note, I also do not believe that ending would have rendered some central messages of the game "useless" or a moot point, as Wing Silver pointed out. Snake and Otacon would not have been sentenced by humanity as a whole, but by a single government and judicial system or by a single organism. This does not defeat the idea of humanity deserving faith and hope, but simply defeat the conviction that every single thing done by every single member of said humanity is something we can relate with.

    And I think this, as well as injustices happening all the time, is something that everyone of us can relate with, no matter what are your moral, ethical, social and political beliefs and ideas.
    ---
    PSN ID: Holden-13
    Stat rosa pristina nomine, nomina nuda tenemus
  • Oct 29, 2012 8:58 am GMT
    Too Batman-like. Glad they didn't go with the original.
    ---
    Anticipating the following: Ni No Kuni (PS3), MGR: Revengeance (PS3), Tales of Xillia (PS3), MGS: GZ (PS3)

    ---

    "You know, they say hunger is the best spice."
    - Spike Spiegel, Coolest Bounty Hunter Ever

  • Oct 29, 2012 10:41 am GMT
    Shaminardrgn posted...
    ...you know, where Snake and Otacon were to be arrested and executed for their 'crimes', how angry would you, and the fan base be?

    I don't know about you, but bad endings that kill you off or end on a bad note (and NOT be one of several endings) really anger me.


    It's far better than living in a world where every single story has a happy ending. Superhero comic books had to go through that **** when comic books was the latest scapegoat apparently turning kids into murderers. The Powers That Be forced the comic book writers to make stories where the good guy wins EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. Other effects included ridiculous bad guys who all wanted to take over the world rather than commit actual crimes.

    And don't you ever ******* use Mass Effect 3's ending as supposed evidence to back you up. It had nothing to with the main character dying, we're not 5 year olds. It was because the ending (and the entire game) was half-arsed, they just ripped off DOWN TO THE COLOURS Deus Ex's endings, and all the endings were the same anyway and had no closure whatsoever.

    Don't you pull that propaganda BS or I will end you. RAGH!
    ---
    I went to GameFAQs and all I got was this lousy sig.
  • Oct 29, 2012 2:35 pm GMT
    git2thechoppa posted...
    *Snip*


    Don't threaten me; besides, I didn't say that the games were bad (you did check the youtube vids, right?) I said that the endings were either bad, or they made you feel uneasy.

    I know reality is evil, that's why we play games and read comics and novels, and watch films. But to have an ending where you are executed for a 'crime' you didn't commit (the tanker from MGS2, which was Ocelot and the Patriots) is just plain....well, bad!

    Becides, Snake does die at the end; he dies of accelerated ageing, which many fans didn't like either, but at least he dies in his sleep or something, rather than be branded an enemy of the world, like "The Boss".

    True, it would add that 'irony' feeling to it, but the fact that Snake mainly killed terrorists throughout the series, preventing global destruction/or enslavement and then being executed for something stupid would anger a lot of people.

    Also, if they were to be executed, so would many other characters, like Raiden, who had killed so many people himself.

    I also feel that Sunny would have wanted revenge on those who killed her adopted uncles. She cares greatly about Otacon and Snake, and if they were executed, she'd want to get back at those who took them away from her. (Mind you, if this ending was used, her becoming the new 'enemy' would be an interesting plot for a future game, as she is an expert in computers and so forth.)
    ---
    "If Ripto were here, I'd give him a piece of my mind!" : Moneybags from Spyro 2
  • Oct 29, 2012 4:45 pm GMT
    Shaminardrgn posted...
    Don't threaten me


    What is your mental age?
    ---
    I went to GameFAQs and all I got was this lousy sig.
  • Oct 29, 2012 5:20 pm GMT
    Isn't Snake a straight up murderer at this point? When he was with the CIA, sure, but since then there's been blood on his hands that he can't answer for.

    Though to be honest, I prefer the concept of Snake shooting himself. Snake himself is a relic of an old age, and something like that, an old warrior taking his life, reminds of me of almost like a Seppuku sort of thing. It felt noble.
    ---
    Live long, be happy, and try to ensure those around you do as well.
    http://i42.tinypic.com/28mgvbq.jpg
  • Oct 29, 2012 10:51 pm GMT
    Shaminardrgn posted...
    So you want a ending where your character, who's been through so much chaos, and saved the world many times is executed as a 'criminal'?

    Geez, it would leave a bad taste in your mouth, similar to how "The Boss" was branded a traitor (by the 'patriots' who were under another name at the time), despite actually saving the world from Volgin, and this was something that Big Boss knew and was forced to keep secret. Then he turned on the corrupt government (and the 'patriots' who he origionally founded, but then realised was bad), and Zero (who took over the 'patriots') and was in turn 'killed' by his son (who was created by and then under orders by the then-unknown 'patriots'), who in turn is executed by the government (even though the 'patriots' are now no more)....Ack!

    I myself am happy they didn't use that ending. It would just seem....well, bad!




    this is such a bad example. PArt of the reason teh current ending sucks is because Big Boss is all of a sudden this incredibly good guy when his story worked so much better knowing that he became a `villain ` to fight against what he believed was a corrupt government.

    Granted, the ending of them being criminals is not exactly 'amazing' but it works better... as stated it tackles more important issues than the final ending did.
    Though as pointed out... the killing himself would have been a better ending.


    Regardless, I just dont think the current ending is any good. It is cool to a point.
    ---
    Movie Review Blog: http://cruizd.blogspot.com
    Japan is so nice!

    Movie and Games review Blog:

    http://cruizd.blogspot.com

  • Oct 30, 2012 2:00 am GMT
    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
  • Oct 30, 2012 2:31 am GMT
    I think that the best solution to this would be to have multiple endings, with bonus items for each of them, like special costumes/items that go with each ending. This way everyone wins.
    ---
    "If Ripto were here, I'd give him a piece of my mind!" : Moneybags from Spyro 2
  • Oct 31, 2012 7:57 pm GMT
    This is a classic example of two completely different views of suicide in culture. The original ending was supposed to have Snake and Otacon turn themselves in as a way of preserving their honor, as that is how suicide is viewed in Japan. But once Kojima was informed that this is not viewed the same was in USA, he changed it so that people like you would be happy.

    I personally think that we missed out on an emotionally powerful, tear-jerking ending that would have gone down as one of the best end of series moment in video game history. And instead of a tragic death we got the opposite; a cheesy revival of an overrated character whose image has been overused to the point where they just can't let him die (Big Boss). And Snake giving up smoking at the end is just dripping of corn.

    They should have gone with the original ending.
    ---
    RIP Old Signature =(
  • Nov 1, 2012 3:42 am GMT
    [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
  • Nov 1, 2012 4:50 am GMT
    Monza_Man_ posted...
    This is a classic example of two completely different views of suicide in culture. The original ending was supposed to have Snake and Otacon turn themselves in as a way of preserving their honor, as that is how suicide is viewed in Japan. But once Kojima was informed that this is not viewed the same was in USA, he changed it so that people like you would be happy.

    I personally think that we missed out on an emotionally powerful, tear-jerking ending that would have gone down as one of the best end of series moment in video game history. And instead of a tragic death we got the opposite; a cheesy revival of an overrated character whose image has been overused to the point where they just can't let him die (Big Boss). And Snake giving up smoking at the end is just dripping of corn.

    They should have gone with the original ending.


    I see what you mean now.

    It's true, however, that many people (particularly from Western cultures) hate it when the main character, whom people grew to love, dies at the end of a series of stories or games.

    For example, take the Harry Potter books; he was origionally going to let Voldemort kill him in the Forbidden Forest, thus sacrificing his life while also destroying the second final Horcrux (leaving Nagini left), and someone else would kill Voldy (most likely Nevile); however, many people, including other famous authors, begged Rowling not to kill him. I wonder how people would react if the series ended with Harry's death?

    Did you also know that she was going to kill Arthur Weasley in book 5 when Nagini attacked him? Only she relented when people begged her not to...so she killed Fred in book 7 instead.

    Getting back to the topic, it seems that Snake became so popular by fans, that he was seen as immortal, that killing him off was seen as a sin or something.

    As for me, I still see them being executed as a slap in the face, but if Snake were to kill himself, that would be more sad, but at the same time, honorable (because, lets assume that the foxdie virus wasnt nullified and was set to activate and kill innocents around him, so he had to kill himself to stop it.)
    ---
    "If Ripto were here, I'd give him a piece of my mind!" : Moneybags from Spyro 2
  • Nov 1, 2012 1:12 pm GMT
    A sad or bitter sweet ending is not necessarily a bad one.
    ---
    "I hate you, UncleWesker. No, really. You are the biggest douche on this board. You should go hang yourself in your basement." ~ RT102
  • Nov 1, 2012 2:03 pm GMT
    The original ending just would not have made too much sense even in the context of the game's plot whatever the views of suicide are in the East and West

    However, if Snake wouldve died at the end of the game by killing himself at the cemetery, I wouldve been sad sure, but it wouldve been understandable and it wouldve been a sacrifice for the rest of humanity so that the virus in his body would not mutate before he died and eventually become a biological weapon himself

    that type of suicide is understandable and works for both East and West views I think

    the ending we got I think was good though as it provided enough closure I think to the entire MGS saga
    ---
    Chapter 7, that's all you need to say to a Valkyria fan, they'll know what you mean-Celestial Damnation (see quote)
Forum Actions

Game Stats

Games You May Like

Users who looked at content for this game also looked at these games.