It's a 9.5 game if you haven't played Battlefield Bad Company 2. If you did - you saw everything already.
First and most important thing - this game is a copy of Battlefield Bad Company 2. Same graphics, same physics, same vehicles, even the aiming cross is identical :)
You'd say what's bad with that ? Just look at it as a continuation of the superb BFBC2. A bunch of people already payed for BFBC2 Onslought and are ready to pay for Vietnam, so why wouldn't you be glad with MoH being a copy of BFBC2 ?
If MoH would be a good copy of BFBC2 it would be fine, but it's not completely true, since EA took only some parts, cut others and added some really bad new ones - maps are smaller, there are less vehicles, less guns, less customization, worse interface and a very bad path EA has decided to pursue - CoD way. For MoH they've added kill-streaks which embrases camping and disbalance in game, gameplay became much more chaotic, so instead of a decent tactical shooter you have a Quake Arena style of gameplay.
On one hand I do understand EA from business perspective - CoD is a popular franchize, there is a huge market of kids who like chaos and random gameplay. So they leave BFBC2 for the older generation and MoH is going to compete with CoD. But as a player i'm very dissapointed with this new path ...