Video Review - Medal of Honor: Warfighter

Basically then, another propagandist modern military shooter. And this time, truly unremarkable.

think a 7 was right for this just played it and like some levels while the plot was boring.

The only problem I had with the first MOH and I have with this one, is that the multiplayer maps just don't stick with me. They're are small areas. All the maps are just pretty boring and it kills me ): Because I think the game could be really awesome. It has a great feeling to it, I just can't get into multiplayer maps, some of them are just dull... 

Still say the best single player campaign EA's ever made was Badcompany 2 but i love battlefield 3's multiplayer over warfighter. just hope EA learns from there mistakes and perhaps take a page out of call of duty's book and try not to fix whats not broken and just make small tweaks here and there. 

incredible

coolest game

\

I was pretty disappointed. I have always been a big fan of COD, Battlefield and  this series. I always liked MOH for the singleplayer campaign, so I got it for a steal on black friday. Maybe its just me, but I just found the game frustrating at certain points... especially the door breaches... had to do some parts over and over and over again... then other parts of the game were almost too easy. Its pretty sad when the most memorable part of an fps are the parts where you are driving. I found the car chases fun and entertaining. Maybe they could make a game of just that.

This game is better than people make it out to be. but this reviewer was fair and issued the points, because it does have flaws, but they are not game breaking

@Rigges I agree. And Medal of Honor has become a crossroad for MW and BF fans. It has great graphics and class-based systems like BF and game mechanics that gear to Modern Warfare. But the series is new to modern combat, what do they expect? A godly game that sells like BO2? (first-day sales are estimated at $500 million, which is (I believe) 11 million copies, and Activision's fourth record-breaking game for first-day sales in four years) It's obviously MUCH different from COD, but they hammer it for steering away from it's formula and calling it super-biased when it came from ACTUAL SOLDIERS OVERSEAS THAT FOUGHT THOSE BATTLES! How is that biased at all, let alone SUPER-biased?

Remember when the first MOH came out? Everyone thought it was amazing... then COD started making games exactly like it and just destroyed the series.

Hopeless Game....don't even bother....broken in all aspects....not at all the quality as it was hyped

Unlimited ammo? Really?

Take away the fancy cover art..and It's all the same thing.  So what else is new in "Modern Warfare" games these days?

I hear that in the next game's multiplayer you'll actually get to have sex with another player, with fist bumps.

I rented the ps3 version of this game it's all been done before but it's still a good game!! I really was expecting an 8 or higher I really am weirded out I disagree.

I was kind of turned off of the idea of getting this by reading bad reviews, but ive watched gameplay and it looks fine.

Oh, look it?s another? *yawn*?another?. zzzzzzzzz

The first inpretion playing the game it looks amazing. Good fun. got it 1/2 price was not going to get it but glad I did.

Fun game when it lets me play, my i5 25k and 7850oc play great on ultra (relflect off and blurr off) @1920x1080p.(a little plastic wrap looking)

What a surprise, EA churning out another placeholder until the next installment of it's primary franchise, Battlefield 4.This game is too bloody glitchy and compromised to give a shot. *Aimbot/wallhackers in 1 out of every 5 games.      >If you try to report a player for cheating, it gives you a spot to put the battlelog to        give the server specifications and stats, but there are no Battlelogs kept on WF.*Obvious port: ESC key has no function in the in-game MP menu and even Battlelog only serves to load up the game itself, only to revert back to the in-game MP menu.*Same unresolved issues of Battlefield 3: spawn camping, grenade spamming, explosive whoring, etc

People don't deal with unique very well, if something comes out it is either "the same" as the game they like, meaning, a cheap copy, or it tries to be different and gets slated for being different.  MOH at the moment is an almost but not quite (although most reviews are pretty harsh) game, they are trying to be different, getting killed for it, but leaving enough bugs and issues to give people a reason to bash it and ignore what worked.  Multiplayer is pretty entertaining and  has great potential based on mechanics, but they need new level designers! Here is a crazy idea, release some tools, like the community do it!

Personally loved the campiagn from the one two years ago and this one just added onto its greatness, havent put to much time into the multiplayer as now im distracted with assassins creed 3 but from what i did play it was quite fun. 

Don't listen to this cheap review, this game is an 8.5

This is an entertaining game, I bet 99% of the haters haven't even played it. I'd score it higher than this review personally

Why did they downgrade on the gore? The last game had bullet wounds and dismemberment. In this game it doesn't even feel like a war, it's like they want kids to think war is a fun arcade game like modern borfare.

i will still play singleplayer, i will stay true to my Medal of honor ways as i have since the first one back in 99.....(the only multiplayer i ever got into was allied assault!!)

I hate CoD but this MoH is even worst then the last one! guys dont matter how you feel about those games dont buy it. Its a fucking frustrating piece of shit. worst multiplayer ive played in a long time.

good game for 30-40 euro's but I think not worthy the 60 euro's

is there a split screen mode for this?

I don't understand why people are attacking this game, recently everyone started to take sides with both either BF3 or MW3, I like both games but that doesn't mean they are the only ones! 

you people keep camparing this game to COD and BF3. you need too stop and realize it is it's own unique game.

SP 4/10

MP 8/10

graphics 8/10

sound 9/10

If you've got some skill then the MP is for you and is worth the price alone. Its nice change of pace and the weapons customization is outstanding.

I saw this coming. Let's try filling those gigas with less graphics and more story, I mean, indie developers are launchin 8bit themed games, I'm not saying that they should come out with an FPS like heretic, or doom, just use, some graphics from, I don't know, 5 years ago, and try to make a good FPS, less movie kind of action, more open world, with a good history, a nice battlefield with lots of  changing situations, great graphics don't always mean great games. And of course, you critics, in some way, this situation is partially your fault, along with fanboys and that kind of people.

Score seems a bit low, expected at least a 7-8. Will still play it though just because I loved the old Medal of Honor series on the playstation 1. Classic game.

danger close used a awesome engine to make crappy game, i will definitely wait for battlefield 4

Why is McShea making an article attacking modern shooters in general but tacking it on MOH??  Sorry didn't want  to give his articles more views.  It's sad to see what you guys are letting him do...

FUCK IGN!! that stupid website keeps deleting users comments they do not like automatically. thats the biggest humiliation and disrespect to ppl's opinions, such a fuckin dictatorship!!!!! stupid paid-off-by-sponsors website!!!