OK, wasn't really good, the later HP GBA games (Goblet of Fire) was better, tho it was better than Sorcerer's Stone.

User Rating: 6.5 | Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets GBA
By squirtle4 | Review Date:
Bad Graphics, decent gameplay, I perferred the GBC and PS2 versions.THe difficulty was kind of in the middle.i wouldn't buy it full price, I'd get it used, or just rent it. Or, go with the GBC game, though it's more of an pokemon-like rpg. Or if you want a game along the same lines as the GBA game ( and you have a PS2) you might want to get the PS2 version fo the game.It's not going to take very long to beat, and unlike the GBC version, you can't play agin and do additional things, mini-games and side-quests.You'll probably play it for around 12 hours, whereas the GBC game u could play for more than 50 hours, and the PS2 around 30.

Other Helpful Reviews for Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

  • Rating:2.9

    Cannot believe how easy it was, no challenge at all.

    By Black_Dragon14 | Review Date: Dec 28, 2005 | GBA

    This game is not what I expected it to be. I finished the game in exactly two days and I had no trouble throughout the game whatsoever. Harry Potter should stick to the movies and the books, 'cause this video game isn't ... Read Full Review

    2 of 3 users found the following review helpful
  • Rating:7.5

    Pretty good HP for the GBA!!

    By Quinones22 | Review Date: Nov 26, 2005 | GBA

    This HP game is actually pretty good for the GBA. It is a strait forward game, were you learn spells along the way and you must use them to figure out puzzels. The places were you can go are pretty basic, but still pret... Read Full Review

    1 of 1 users found the following review helpful
Load Comments (0)