any word on grove street?

I_know_u posted...

adz-spec posted...

This is going nowhere and you're missing my points anyway. Bottom line is, I don't believe Grove Street will or can be in GTA V. That is based on what Rockstar have confirmed about their universes and looking at the history of the series, what has carried over and what hasn't. If you disagree, then fair enough.

You have no points. It seems to me that you can't understand what rockstar does with their decisions and you think you have some sort of pattern over the fact of naming areas in the game. As all the points you so called had, you came unprepared. And everytime I stumped you, you came back with an "Oh, it does have to do with the story..." and it's annoying when people are proved wrong and come back and say things like, "uh, oh yeah that did happened". Grove street has a possibility to come back. Viewing the possibilities of past decisions of rockstar.

No fan would be mad. It would be a reminder of such a well crafted game with outstanding achievements in gaming history. On top of this game. it's well thought out to get fans babbling about it in excitement. But youre not able to think about it in an creative point of view instead of giving random names to an areas of the game.

I think you just argued the same points for over hundred posts.

I have to agree with adz though, based on past games from GTA Grove St. will not return in the story. At most it would just be a small easter egg as a run down street.

The idea that Vinewood played a huge part in GTA:SA's story is laughable. It just didn't affect the story at all. IIRC none of the main characters even mentioned Vinewood in the dialogue. Having it return is no more special than the city being called Los Santos.

Dark_volkswagen posted...

nativengine posted...

adz-spec posted...

^ This guy gets it.

At least someone does

Alot of fans actually like the idea of a grove street. If you look at past comments, people actually would like the name adopted over from San Andreas to V. R* could decide to please their lovely fans and stamp the name on a cup-de-sac as an easter egg or street name. Even if it did have to do with the story. In fact, making it do with the story makes it much more possible to be planted as an easter egg, and for fans to bask in the Grove street memories without affecting the current story taking place. So things like this can be brought back. Just like they did with Francis International Airport an Vinewood. "Oh, but Vinewood had nothing to do with the story" Yes it did. "Oh, but my dear old R* just decided to put a few missions there, it doesn't count." Really... where do we draw the line between what you put in and what you can't? Even with the naming of the series, GTA III to GTA IV. Though they claim a different universe but yet are in the same world. MIND BLOW. Sure, Star wars was edited. Was it a different universe? No. Family guy birthed The Cleveland show. Was it a different universe? No. R* saying San Andreas is a different universe from V is like McDonalds saying they don't put fillers or extenders in their pork.

You re saying that it is utterly impossible for Grove street to make a comeback when you aren't able to look through the unorganized decisions they made. And you don't see the random path that R* takes in previous generations with names. You aren't able to create logic in you're head, even with past references presented to you. So you basically can't make predictions based on past information to at least some level of degree. You done goofed.

You need to get over the universes thing. It's a fact that GTA 3, VC and SA are in a separate universe to GTA IV and V. No amount of walls of text is going to change that.