no. It would disrupt the frantic rush of the game. IMO cover systems aren't great in FPS games anyway, since you don't really have a good field of view.
I think it would bebetter suited for a more slow-paced game like Bad Company, which is far more realistic and feels like an actual Battlefield. CoD is an arcade shooter, nothing more. BF:BC actually strives to emulate a frantic war experience and I think a cover system in BC3would add a nice touch of realism rather than crouching for cover.
Definitely this. The last thing I'd like to see is a bunch of prepubescent kids hiding behind cover for hours, only for me to walk past and get my head blown off. Its already a problem, lets not add fuel to the fire.
NO! Cover in CoD is a bad idea. The gameplay is meant to be fast paced even boardering on arcadey. Cover works perfect for a game like Rainbow Six or Gears.
No FPS with a cover system would ever work properly, because it would pan out to 3rd person, gears works well because its 3rd person and well worked. But it would be interesting to see a FPS with a cover system that stays in 1st person, so when you look around a corner it actually peers not zooms out.
i don't think it would benefit from a cover system especially since previous FPS games that try to implement a cover system haven't really worked out solid.
no. It would disrupt the frantic rush of the game. IMO cover systems aren't great in FPS games anyway, since you don't really have a good field of view.
I_am_theOpus
Well, I dont know about that. Call of Juarez did a pretty damn good job of it.
no. It would disrupt the frantic rush of the game. IMO cover systems aren't great in FPS games anyway, since you don't really have a good field of view.
Log in to comment