When I first played Bioshock, I was an immiture, shallow gamer. I admit that, but that was two years ago. I dismissed Bioshock and all it's glory maybe because I didn't fully understand it or didn't fully appreacite its depth and beauty.
Now it's 2009, and I've finished it, bought it and playing though it again. And what a game it is. I thouroughly enjoyed it and I have reviewed it here.
So what the hell is up with Bioshock 2? No Ken Levine? Revisiting Rapture even though Jack liberated it or enslaved it? Playing as a Big Daddy? WTF? This makes no sense, Bioshock's story never left room for a sequel, this seems like 2K's way of trying to make a quick buck and potentially ruin the franchise.
It looks too much of the same, so it looks like it will be relying on the story as it's selling point and that's what most journalists have put it down to. That's where the problem is, how can there be anything left to tell about Rapture? We've listened to all the diaries, we know how Rapture works, what else could be left to know that had a major outcome on the city as a whole?
Sorry if this sounds like a rant, it's more disbelief than anything else.
Does anyone else feel the same way?
Log in to comment