Insignia HDTV?????

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for coop3422
coop3422

402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 coop3422
Member since 2003 • 402 Posts
Hi everyone, as some of you may know, Forza 2 is "supposed" to hit shelves in about one months time, so I needa new tv. I am kind of on a budget, and the Insignia seems descent. It only had 1000:1 contrast ratio while many have 3000:1, but I don't think I am too worried about it. I will still only be watching SD cable and DVD's, the only thing I will be doing in HD will be xbox 360 (and yes I have the premium console so I have HD cables already) so my question is: is the 32' Insignia NSLCD32FS a descent tv for my application? My friend has the 37' model, seems very nice, and I will be buying the 4 year extended warrantee as I am aware that Insignia's have a burnt pixel problem. Thanks everyone, Oh and it's price is $729 canadian, anything else I should look at in this price range?
Avatar image for fore_runner
fore_runner

8704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 fore_runner
Member since 2004 • 8704 Posts

3000:1 is really a minimum for gaming.

 

Try checking this out.

http://gear.ign.com/hdtv/ 

Avatar image for SadExchange
SadExchange

1866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 80

User Lists: 0

#3 SadExchange
Member since 2003 • 1866 Posts

I have the same model you're talking about buying and I love it.  I've been using it for little over a month now and have noticed no problems and love playing my 360 with HD enabled instead of on a regular tv.  My opinion would be to buy it I picked it up along with a 4 year warranty just to make sure.

Avatar image for MR_SMI13Y
MR_SMI13Y

828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 MR_SMI13Y
Member since 2006 • 828 Posts
insignia is not bad at all its only that its a different brand with insignia slapped on to it so best buy can have it exclusive. I got a 27inch HD and it was good for my budget . only cost me 340 on sale.
Avatar image for seabiscuit8686
seabiscuit8686

2862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 seabiscuit8686
Member since 2005 • 2862 Posts

3000:1 is really a minimum for gaming.

 Try checking this out.

http://gear.ign.com/hdtv/

fore_runner

Wow you honestly don't know much about HDTVs. It is quite simple for TV manufacturers to increase the contrast "ratio" by adjusting brightness for the tests which means this "3000:1" is probably only the 1000:1 he was using. I have the Insignia 27 inch LCD HDTV and it works fine for me. No dead pixels, a few "cloud" spots but thats to be expected for under $500. I think they are good tvs for a guy on a budget like i was. Go for it 

Avatar image for the1stmoonfly
the1stmoonfly

3293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 the1stmoonfly
Member since 2006 • 3293 Posts
contrast is at least as important as resolution for a good picture, i would even go so far as to say its more important, with a low contrast ratio you will loose details in the shadows because everything will just look dark, and the bright parts will just look too bright, you need a decent contrast ratio. If your on a budget then get a tv that is 720p native and get a CR as good as your money will let you, and if your going for lcd then make sure the response time is at least 8ms, ideally go for 6ms or less as your budget will allow.
Avatar image for KoRn_Eddy_88
KoRn_Eddy_88

1619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 KoRn_Eddy_88
Member since 2005 • 1619 Posts
i think it was sony who released a 10,000:1 tv not to long ago
Avatar image for gp19
gp19

4252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 gp19
Member since 2005 • 4252 Posts

i think it was sony who released a 10,000:1 tv not to long ago KoRn_Eddy_88

There are a lot of 10,000:1. I have a 50' LG 1080p Plasma, and it has 10,000:1 Contrast Ratio. Anyway, the Insignia looks nice, and the warranty is prob a good idea, other than that you'll love hd gaming.

Avatar image for Maggot_FF
Maggot_FF

215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Maggot_FF
Member since 2006 • 215 Posts

[QUOTE="KoRn_Eddy_88"]i think it was sony who released a 10,000:1 tv not to long ago gp19

There are a lot of 10,000:1. I have a 50' LG 1080p Plasma, and it has 10,000:1 Contrast Ratio. Anyway, the Insignia looks nice, and the warranty is prob a good idea, other than that you'll love hd gaming.



don't trust this, the TV's that has ratio around 1000-3000's +/- are measured differently than the TV's around the 10.000's. so a TV that has a 10.000:1 ratio isn't 3.3 times better than a 1:3000 ratio TV. at least that's what a salesman told me. and i trust him so:P
Avatar image for Goldeneyemaster
Goldeneyemaster

6906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Goldeneyemaster
Member since 2003 • 6906 Posts
[QUOTE="fore_runner"]

3000:1 is really a minimum for gaming.

Try checking this out.

http://gear.ign.com/hdtv/

seabiscuit8686

Wow you honestly don't know much about HDTVs. It is quite simple for TV manufacturers to increase the contrast "ratio" by adjusting brightness for the tests which means this "3000:1" is probably only the 1000:1 he was using. I have the Insignia 27 inch LCD HDTV and it works fine for me. No dead pixels, a few "cloud" spots but thats to be expected for under $500. I think they are good tvs for a guy on a budget like i was. Go for it

Exactly, the Aquos that has a 10,000:1 contrast is pretty much BS 

Avatar image for the1stmoonfly
the1stmoonfly

3293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 the1stmoonfly
Member since 2006 • 3293 Posts

My tv has a 10,000:1 contrast ratio and trust me, it makes a difference, ive seen tvs with less and they dont compare to my tv when the resolutions are exactly the same with the same source material, thing is with all these flat screens, there are so many other factors, like processing technology, dot pitch and general build quality. My tv was £2500 and that makes a difference too, a cheaper set may have the same CR but wouldnt look as good because my tv using better processing technology, just spend as much as you can, stick with 720p native unless your going over 52", get the CR as high as you can and try and keep to name brands as they are the better sets, make sure response time is at least 8ms, and you have at least 1 component and 1 HDMI input. If you get plasma, it'll cost a little more but CR will gerally be a bit higher and response time is pretty much instant, like under 4ms. Good luck.

For LCD: Sony and Samsung are best.

For plasma: Panasonic and Pioneer are best.

Avatar image for gatsbythepig
gatsbythepig

11987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 gatsbythepig
Member since 2003 • 11987 Posts
I would really take a look at anything Samsung.  I have found their response rate to be very good at 8ms.  Some of their TV's also have 8000:1 aspect ratio.  Plus, it is the tv that Microsoft uses in their kiosks.
Avatar image for coop3422
coop3422

402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 coop3422
Member since 2003 • 402 Posts
bump, everyone is split 50/50 down the middle, ahhh:(
Avatar image for g5velocity
g5velocity

1017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 g5velocity
Member since 2007 • 1017 Posts
See if you can get a hold of Vizios.  Best value for your money you're putting out.  I know it's not the best picture but it includes all the other bells and whistles and it doesn't leave your wallet completely empty.
Avatar image for tony_fjellborg
tony_fjellborg

1123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 tony_fjellborg
Member since 2006 • 1123 Posts

I would really take a look at anything Samsung.  I have found their response rate to be very good at 8ms.  Some of their TV's also have 8000:1 aspect ratio.  Plus, it is the tv that Microsoft uses in their kiosks.gatsbythepig

A tv cant have 8000:1 aspect ratio. The messure it in degrees, the best tv can have up to 180*, witch means that you can look at the tv from what ever angle you want and still the picture wont become darker, brighter or etc. 8000:1 is the contrast, the difference between black and white. So a tv with 8000:1 means that the black is 8000 times darker then the white.

Avatar image for the1stmoonfly
the1stmoonfly

3293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 the1stmoonfly
Member since 2006 • 3293 Posts
first of all, aspect ratio is the shape of the screen, as in widescreen which is 16:9 aspect ratio, this means the screen is 16 part wide to 9 part high, so a screnn 16 inches wide would be 9 inches high for example. Secondly, its the viewing angle that measured in degrees, meaning the maximum angle that a screen can be viewed from the sides, 180 degrees would mean that you could stand with your soulder to the screen looking directly ahead and be able to see all the picture. And finally, contrast ratio is the difference in colours between the brightest whites to the darkest blacks, so the higher your contrast ratio, the greater range of shades of colour your screen can display, which basically translates into more detail in the displayed picture, this would have the affect of a very dark picture having more visible detail as opposed to a blanket of black being shown, as im sure you can imagine, the difference between greys and blacks is fine, and the more shades betwen these colours on a dark picture makes all the difference.
Avatar image for dragonslayerssj
dragonslayerssj

1974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 dragonslayerssj
Member since 2003 • 1974 Posts
quick question after reading all of this... is there a difference between normal contrast and Dynamic contrast? i saw a TV that said it had a 1000:1 contrast then in parenthesis it said (10,000:1 Dynamic). Is that good?
Avatar image for creekfan_basic
creekfan_basic

2539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 creekfan_basic
Member since 2002 • 2539 Posts

10,000:1 is dynamic contrast ratio, not real contrast ratio, its a BS measurement, Samsung does the same thing claiming 10,000:1 on their TV's, in real terms its about 3000:1.....

Avatar image for terrellpakeman
terrellpakeman

1326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 terrellpakeman
Member since 2003 • 1326 Posts
I think dynamic is the range from the darkest blacks to the whitest whites while the static CR is measured with both of these elements on the screen at the same time which is why it's always lower. I could be wrong though.
Avatar image for seabiscuit8686
seabiscuit8686

2862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 seabiscuit8686
Member since 2005 • 2862 Posts
To the OP, I have an Insignia 27 inch LCD HDTV that I purchased a few weeks back for
Avatar image for seabiscuit8686
seabiscuit8686

2862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 seabiscuit8686
Member since 2005 • 2862 Posts

To the OP, I have an Insignia 27 inch LCD HDTV that I purchased a few weeks back for seabiscuit8686

Wow it keeps cutting off the end of my message. Stupid gamespot. Whatever. I said I will post some pictures if you want 

Avatar image for seabiscuit8686
seabiscuit8686

2862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 seabiscuit8686
Member since 2005 • 2862 Posts

Pict One 

Avatar image for seabiscuit8686
seabiscuit8686

2862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 seabiscuit8686
Member since 2005 • 2862 Posts

These are dark because of the camera (cheap Kodak 3 megapixle) 

Avatar image for seabiscuit8686
seabiscuit8686

2862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 seabiscuit8686
Member since 2005 • 2862 Posts
I'll post a few game ones when i get off work