Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsOff-Topic Discussion › Lincoln was a terrible movie. What do yo ...

The Classic Off-Topic forum is a place where games or platforms discussions are taboo. Here, you can talk about just about anything outside of games, just make sure to stay classy and follow the rules.

Forum Rules:
- Follow the Terms of Use and read the FAQ.
- Keep your discussions friendly and respectful of others.
- Keep the discussions work friendly. More details in the FAQ (For something more laid back go to Off Topic: After Hours
- Game and platform discussions NOT allowed (For that go to the Primary Games Board or System Wars.
- Do NOT post or bump extremely abusive discussions.
- Hate speech not permitted.

Lincoln was a terrible movie. What do you guys think?

Forum Actions
  • Level 19
    Gitaroo Man
    Posts: 563
    Feb 17, 2013 5:27 pm GMT
    It was just plain boring. The main plot could be summarized in one sentence: "Lincoln helps gets the 13th Amendment passed." The screenplay is written more like a history book than an actual movie. There were way to many characters and a total lack of character development to the point where it's very hard to care about any of the characters' motives. Even Lincoln (whose name is the title of the movie may I remind you) comes off as bland and barely characterized. There was so much opportunity to actually characterize Lincoln and focus on his personal life but the movie chose not to. For example, he suffered from depression and he may have been ill before he died. Never saw one scene that portrayed him as anything other than a pretty normal, healthy guy. Overall, the movie feels like those boring talking scenes in the Star Wars prequels. Don't get me wrong, the performances were great but the characters were so poorly written that they're easily forgettable. Plot Spoilers:
    There were a couple of subplots that go nowhere. For example, Lincoln's son joins the army even though his father tries to discourage him. After he joins the army, nothing ever comes out of it. There's no scenes of him in battle, no scenes focusing on whether or not he feels he made the right choice. Instead there's just one or two scenes where the son's wearing a uniform and standing near other soldiers. There was a very small subplot about Lincoln's relationship with his wife that sort of gets resolved at the end. There's basically one scene where Lincoln argues with his wife and brings up her mental health which was a scene I actually liked because it makes Lincoln seem more like a person than just a historical figure. Then there's another scene where they reconcile. Finally, the scene where we find out that Lincoln is assassinated is so poorly done. Basically: The film shows you a play and you're expecting Lincoln to get shot but instead a man runs on stage and yells the news that "The President has been shot". So much wasted opportunity for a powerful scene. The only emotional part about it was that the camera focused on his youngest son crying for about two seconds. I mean, I guess they were going for a Macbeth sort of thing where a character dies off-screen but that worked in Macbeth because there was actual build-up to it from the perspective of the killer.
    Edited on Feb 17, 2013 5:28 pm GMT
    It was just plain boring. The main plot could be summarized in one sentence: "Lincoln helps gets the 13th Amendment passed." The screenplay is written more like a history book than an actual movie. There were way to many characters and a total lack of character development to the point where it's very hard to care about any of the characters' motives. Even Lincoln (whose name is the title of the movie may I remind you) comes off as bland and barely characterized. There was so much opportunity to actually characterize Lincoln and focus on his personal life but the movie chose not to. For example, he suffered from depression and he may have been ill before he died. Never saw one scene that portrayed him as anything other than a pretty normal, healthy guy. Overall, the movie feels like those boring talking scenes in the Star Wars prequels. Don't get me wrong, the performances were great but the characters were so poorly written that they're easily forgettable. Plot Spoilers: There were a couple of subplots that go nowhere. For example, Lincoln's son joins the army even though his father tries to discourage him. After he joins the army, nothing ever comes out of it. There's no scenes of him in battle, no scenes focusing on whether or not he feels he made the right choice. Instead there's just one or two scenes where the son's wearing a uniform and standing near other soldiers. There was a very small subplot about Lincoln's relationship with his wife that sort of gets resolved at the end. There's basically one scene where Lincoln argues with his wife and brings up her mental health which was a scene I actually liked because it makes Lincoln seem more like a person than just a historical figure. Then there's another scene where they reconcile. Finally, the scene where we find out that Lincoln is assassinated is so poorly done. Basically: The film shows you a play and you're expecting Lincoln to get shot but instead a man runs on stage and yells the news that "The President has been shot". So much wasted opportunity for a powerful scene. The only emotional part about it was that the camera focused on his youngest son crying for about two seconds. I mean, I guess they were going for a Macbeth sort of thing where a character dies off-screen but that worked in Macbeth because there was actual build-up to it from the perspective of the killer.
  • Level 40
    Abobo
    Posts: 10268
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 5:28 pm GMT
    I've never seen it, so I don't like it.
    I've never seen it, so I don't like it.
  • Level 72
    King of All Cosmos
    Posts: 145786
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 5:28 pm GMT
    Didn't see it.

    Didn't see it.
  • Level 18
    Flicky
    Posts: 1984
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 5:29 pm GMT

    didn't see it, but I can guarantee that abe Lincoln vampire slayer was better.

    didn't see it, but I can guarantee that abe Lincoln vampire slayer was better.

  • Level 44
    Violence Fight
    Posts: 11716
    Feb 17, 2013 5:30 pm GMT

    A friend of mine said he found it boring.

    Then agian, said friend thinks the Transformers films are amazing.



    ---
    Check Out My Digital And Minecraft Art Here!
    WARNING!: May Contain Ponies!
    ---

    A friend of mine said he found it boring.

    Then agian, said friend thinks the Transformers films are amazing.

  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 26988
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 5:30 pm GMT

    It was amazing to those who like history and were not expecting a michael bay film in the 1860s

    It was amazing to those who like history and were not expecting a michael bay film in the 1860s

  • Level 7
    Sectoid
    Posts: 34
    Feb 17, 2013 5:31 pm GMT

    Anyone who would rather watch a vampire-slayer is an idiot holy hell. What is wrong with you people, don't you appreciate history even a little bit?

    Anyone who would rather watch a vampire-slayer is an idiot holy hell. What is wrong with you people, don't you appreciate history even a little bit?

  • Level 43
    Sword of Sodan
    Posts: 9422
    Feb 17, 2013 5:32 pm GMT
    I enjoyed it. I am not the biggest history buff but I think that's what made me appreciate it, the learning experience.
    Check Out My Blog, TheGreyStash! Click The Sig.

    Currenty Playing Dead Space 3 (PC) PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale (PSVita)

    I enjoyed it. I am not the biggest history buff but I think that's what made me appreciate it, the learning experience.
  • Level 72
    King of All Cosmos
    Posts: 145786
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 5:33 pm GMT

    Smatmat wrote:

    Anyone who would rather watch a vampire-slayer is an idiot holy hell. What is wrong with you people, don't you appreciate history even a little bit?

    I doubt it was historically accurate. Hollywood rarely is.....did hear it was mostly talking...which would be a rather dull movie for some.  Different strokes and all...

    Edited on Feb 17, 2013 5:37 pm GMT

    [QUOTE="Smatmat"]

    Anyone who would rather watch a vampire-slayer is an idiot holy hell. What is wrong with you people, don't you appreciate history even a little bit?

    [/QUOTE] I doubt it was historically accurate. Hollywood rarely is.....did hear it was mostly talking...which would be a rather dull movie for some.  Different strokes and all...

  • Level 46
    Mutoid Man
    Posts: 22647
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 5:34 pm GMT

    I disagree with everything you said but I'm too lazy to say why.

    tl;dr Lincoln was an awesome film and deserves all the awards it will get.

    I disagree with everything you said but I'm too lazy to say why.

    tl;dr Lincoln was an awesome film and deserves all the awards it will get.

  • Level 38
    DJ Boy
    Posts: 10225
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 5:36 pm GMT

    Nah, it was a great movie.

    Something extremely smart and witty is displayed here in this sig. You just can't see it.

    Nah, it was a great movie.

  • Level 19
    Gitaroo Man
    Posts: 563
    Feb 17, 2013 5:38 pm GMT
    Aljosa23 wrote:

    I disagree with everything you said but I'm too lazy to say why.

    tl;dr Lincoln was an awesome film and deserves all the awards it will get.


    >disagrees with everything I said
    >tl;dr
    [QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

    I disagree with everything you said but I'm too lazy to say why.

    tl;dr Lincoln was an awesome film and deserves all the awards it will get.

    [/QUOTE] >disagrees with everything I said >tl;dr
  • Level 46
    Mutoid Man
    Posts: 22647
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 5:39 pm GMT

    Reed_Bowie wrote:
    Aljosa23 wrote:

    I disagree with everything you said but I'm too lazy to say why.

    tl;dr Lincoln was an awesome film and deserves all the awards it will get.

    >disagrees with everything I said >tl;dr
    The tl;dr is for my long explanation that I'm too tired to write up. I read everything you said.

    [QUOTE="Reed_Bowie"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

    I disagree with everything you said but I'm too lazy to say why.

    tl;dr Lincoln was an awesome film and deserves all the awards it will get.

    [/QUOTE] >disagrees with everything I said >tl;dr[/QUOTE]The tl;dr is for my long explanation that I'm too tired to write up. :P I read everything you said.

  • Level 19
    Gitaroo Man
    Posts: 563
    Feb 17, 2013 5:39 pm GMT
    Aljosa23 wrote:

    Reed_Bowie wrote:
    Aljosa23 wrote:

    I disagree with everything you said but I'm too lazy to say why.

    tl;dr Lincoln was an awesome film and deserves all the awards it will get.

    >disagrees with everything I said >tl;dr
    The tl;dr is for my long explanation that I'm too tired to write up. I read everything you said.


    Shouldn't that be "tl;dw"?
    [QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

    [QUOTE="Reed_Bowie"][QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

    I disagree with everything you said but I'm too lazy to say why.

    tl;dr Lincoln was an awesome film and deserves all the awards it will get.

    [/QUOTE] >disagrees with everything I said >tl;dr[/QUOTE]The tl;dr is for my long explanation that I'm too tired to write up. :P I read everything you said.

    [/QUOTE] Shouldn't that be "tl;dw"?
  • Level 72
    King of All Cosmos
    Posts: 46264
    Site moderatorBoard Moderator
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 5:42 pm GMT

    It's amazing for what it does. If you can't see that it's not the fault of the movie.

    Now Playing: Planetside 2 (PC) | Age of Empires II HD (PC)

    It's amazing for what it does. If you can't see that it's not the fault of the movie.

  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 8715
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 5:43 pm GMT
    wis3boi wrote:

    It was amazing to those who like history and were not expecting a michael bay film in the 1860s




    and i loved it.


    [QUOTE="wis3boi"]

    It was amazing to those who like history and were not expecting a michael bay film in the 1860s

    [/QUOTE] and i loved it.
  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 26988
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 5:43 pm GMT

    SaudiFury wrote:
    wis3boi wrote:

    It was amazing to those who like history and were not expecting a michael bay film in the 1860s

    and i loved it.

    Same.  My favorite of 2012

    [QUOTE="SaudiFury"][QUOTE="wis3boi"]

    It was amazing to those who like history and were not expecting a michael bay film in the 1860s

    [/QUOTE] and i loved it.[/QUOTE]

    Same.  My favorite of 2012

  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 19137
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 5:44 pm GMT
    SaudiFury wrote:
    wis3boi wrote:

    It was amazing to those who like history and were not expecting a michael bay film in the 1860s




    and i loved it.

    I thought it was great, too. Daniel Day-Lewis deserves an Oscar.
    Laihendi wrote:
    I would rather exhibit traits of a sociopath than an altruist. Many characteristics of sociopathy are actually signs of healthy individuals. Many people mistakenly believe that whatever is normal or common is healthy, and whatever is different/abnormal is unhealthy. Altruism is by consensus healthy simply because it is normal, when in reality it is an irrational and destructive mental illness. The characteristics of sociopathy are mostly healthy and rational but people who exhibit them are considered deranged anyways because they contradict the social norm.
    [QUOTE="SaudiFury"][QUOTE="wis3boi"]

    It was amazing to those who like history and were not expecting a michael bay film in the 1860s

    [/QUOTE] and i loved it.[/QUOTE] I thought it was great, too. Daniel Day-Lewis deserves an Oscar.
  • Level 19
    Gitaroo Man
    Posts: 563
    Feb 17, 2013 5:46 pm GMT
    Wasdie wrote:

    It's amazing for what it does. If you can't see that it's not the fault of the movie.


    What it did was put a textbook chapter to film. I guess I can honestly say I don't appreciate that as much as a movie with a good plot and characters.
    Edited on Feb 17, 2013 5:49 pm GMT
    [QUOTE="Wasdie"]

    It's amazing for what it does. If you can't see that it's not the fault of the movie.

    [/QUOTE] What it did was put a textbook chapter to film. I guess I can honestly say I don't appreciate that as much as a movie with a good plot and characters.
  • Level 64
    Easter Egg
    Posts: 33386
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 6:11 pm GMT

    I thought it was great.

    ...

    I thought it was great.

Forum Actions
ForumsOff-Topic Discussion › Lincoln was a terrible movie. What do yo ...