Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsPC & Mac Games › Low profile video card under 220 watts t ...

This forum is considered a sanctuary for PC and Mac Gamers. Anti-PC and Mac game discussions will be moderated as a type of forum invasion. Keep your discussions about the games and those who play them.

PC & Mac Forum Rules

- Read the Terms of Use and FAQ.
- Illegal activities not permitted; admitting/requesting piracy and defeating copy-protection will result in the removal of privileges.
- No hardware specific discussions allowed. Use the Computer Hardware forum.
- Platform comparison discussions belong in the System Wars forum.

Low profile video card under 220 watts that can play Battlefield 3 60+ FPS?

Forum Actions
  • Level 7
    Sectoid
    Posts: 77
    Feb 17, 2013 4:01 pm GMT

    Does anyone know a cheap low profile video card under 220 watts power suply, that can run BF3 60+ Frames? (Does not matter on settings)

    Does anyone know a cheap low profile video card under 220 watts power suply, that can run BF3 60+ Frames? (Does not matter on settings)

  • Level 58
    Death=Adder
    Posts: 25049
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 4:38 pm GMT

    speedysam123 wrote:

    Does anyone know a cheap low profile video card under 220 watts power suply, that can run BF3 60+ Frames? (Does not matter on settings)

    resolution?

    steam id: ionus123, PSN: ionusx,BLOG

    sig

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"]

    Does anyone know a cheap low profile video card under 220 watts power suply, that can run BF3 60+ Frames? (Does not matter on settings)

    [/QUOTE] resolution?

  • Level 7
    Sectoid
    Posts: 77
    Feb 17, 2013 5:07 pm GMT
    ionusX wrote:

    speedysam123 wrote:

    Does anyone know a cheap low profile video card under 220 watts power suply, that can run BF3 60+ Frames? (Does not matter on settings)

    resolution?



    800x600 or 1024x768 Either one
    [QUOTE="ionusX"]

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"]

    Does anyone know a cheap low profile video card under 220 watts power suply, that can run BF3 60+ Frames? (Does not matter on settings)

    [/QUOTE] resolution?

    [/QUOTE] 800x600 or 1024x768 Either one
  • Level 58
    Death=Adder
    Posts: 25049
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 5:16 pm GMT

    speedysam123 wrote:
    ionusX wrote:

    speedysam123 wrote:

    Does anyone know a cheap low profile video card under 220 watts power suply, that can run BF3 60+ Frames? (Does not matter on settings)

    resolution?

    800x600 or 1024x768 Either one
    hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly

    steam id: ionus123, PSN: ionusx,BLOG

    sig

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"][QUOTE="ionusX"]

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"]

    Does anyone know a cheap low profile video card under 220 watts power suply, that can run BF3 60+ Frames? (Does not matter on settings)

    [/QUOTE] resolution?

    [/QUOTE] 800x600 or 1024x768 Either one[/QUOTE] hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly

  • Level 7
    Sectoid
    Posts: 77
    Feb 17, 2013 5:19 pm GMT
    ionusX wrote:

    speedysam123 wrote:
    ionusX wrote:
    resolution?

    800x600 or 1024x768 Either one
    hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly



    Well i mainly care about gameplay, like minecraft has good gameplay but bad graphics. Even if i can play the game at high settings, i play at normal for better framerate. If it's over 60 fps with either graphics it does not really matter though. Normal will be fine with me.
    [QUOTE="ionusX"]

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"][QUOTE="ionusX"] resolution?

    [/QUOTE] 800x600 or 1024x768 Either one[/QUOTE] hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly

    [/QUOTE] Well i mainly care about gameplay, like minecraft has good gameplay but bad graphics. Even if i can play the game at high settings, i play at normal for better framerate. If it's over 60 fps with either graphics it does not really matter though. Normal will be fine with me.
  • Level 7
    Sectoid
    Posts: 77
    Feb 17, 2013 5:21 pm GMT
    ionusX wrote:

    speedysam123 wrote:
    ionusX wrote:
    resolution?

    800x600 or 1024x768 Either one
    hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly



    Actually that video card wont fit, i have a slim style computer. I tried the Radeon HD 250 gts but it did not fit.
    [QUOTE="ionusX"]

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"][QUOTE="ionusX"] resolution?

    [/QUOTE] 800x600 or 1024x768 Either one[/QUOTE] hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly

    [/QUOTE] Actually that video card wont fit, i have a slim style computer. I tried the Radeon HD 250 gts but it did not fit.
  • Level 33
    Goombella
    Posts: 8742
    Feb 17, 2013 5:27 pm GMT

    speedysam123 wrote:
    ionusX wrote:

    speedysam123 wrote:
    800x600 or 1024x768 Either one
    hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly

    Actually that video card wont fit, i have a slim style computer. I tried the Radeon HD 250 gts but it did not fit.

    I'm not sure, but you might not be able to find a card that small that will handle BF3.

    What is love? Baby, don't hurt me. Don't hurt me. No more.

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"][QUOTE="ionusX"]

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"] 800x600 or 1024x768 Either one[/QUOTE] hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly

    [/QUOTE] Actually that video card wont fit, i have a slim style computer. I tried the Radeon HD 250 gts but it did not fit.[/QUOTE]

    I'm not sure, but you might not be able to find a card that small that will handle BF3.

  • Level 7
    Sectoid
    Posts: 77
    Feb 17, 2013 5:28 pm GMT
    the_bi99man wrote:

    speedysam123 wrote:
    ionusX wrote:
    hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly

    Actually that video card wont fit, i have a slim style computer. I tried the Radeon HD 250 gts but it did not fit.

    I'm not sure, but you might not be able to find a card that small that will handle BF3.



    Im thinking of buying a new case, im just worried about messing up when im putting the parts in the case.
    [QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"][QUOTE="ionusX"] hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly

    [/QUOTE] Actually that video card wont fit, i have a slim style computer. I tried the Radeon HD 250 gts but it did not fit.[/QUOTE]

    I'm not sure, but you might not be able to find a card that small that will handle BF3.

    [/QUOTE] Im thinking of buying a new case, im just worried about messing up when im putting the parts in the case.
  • Level 64
    Easter Egg
    Posts: 12493
    User is Online
    Feb 17, 2013 5:30 pm GMT

    speedysam123 wrote:
    the_bi99man wrote:

    speedysam123 wrote:
    Actually that video card wont fit, i have a slim style computer. I tried the Radeon HD 250 gts but it did not fit.

    I'm not sure, but you might not be able to find a card that small that will handle BF3.

    Im thinking of buying a new case, im just worried about messing up when im putting the parts in the case.

    Unless you're rubbing your feet on a rug while handling the motherboard and throwing pieces all over the place, transferring contents from one case to the next is very easy. You don't need to be that worried about it.

    Ever wondered how long a game will take to beat before you buy it? Presenting Legendaryscmt's Game Times Blog. 233 games clocked to date covering modern and previous generations. Last Update: 5/22/13

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"][QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"] Actually that video card wont fit, i have a slim style computer. I tried the Radeon HD 250 gts but it did not fit.[/QUOTE]

    I'm not sure, but you might not be able to find a card that small that will handle BF3.

    [/QUOTE] Im thinking of buying a new case, im just worried about messing up when im putting the parts in the case.[/QUOTE]

    Unless you're rubbing your feet on a rug while handling the motherboard and throwing pieces all over the place, transferring contents from one case to the next is very easy. You don't need to be that worried about it.

  • Level 33
    Goombella
    Posts: 8742
    Feb 17, 2013 5:33 pm GMT

    speedysam123 wrote:
    the_bi99man wrote:

    speedysam123 wrote:
    Actually that video card wont fit, i have a slim style computer. I tried the Radeon HD 250 gts but it did not fit.

    I'm not sure, but you might not be able to find a card that small that will handle BF3.

    Im thinking of buying a new case, im just worried about messing up when im putting the parts in the case.

    What are your other components? If they're all really low end stuff too, it might be worth it to just build a whole new system. If you just want good framerates, and don't care about maxing games out, you could probably get away with like, less than $500 for a whole new system. And even something like that would actually play all but the most recent, super graphic intense games, at pretty high settings, too.

    What is love? Baby, don't hurt me. Don't hurt me. No more.

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"][QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"] Actually that video card wont fit, i have a slim style computer. I tried the Radeon HD 250 gts but it did not fit.[/QUOTE]

    I'm not sure, but you might not be able to find a card that small that will handle BF3.

    [/QUOTE] Im thinking of buying a new case, im just worried about messing up when im putting the parts in the case.[/QUOTE]

    What are your other components? If they're all really low end stuff too, it might be worth it to just build a whole new system. If you just want good framerates, and don't care about maxing games out, you could probably get away with like, less than $500 for a whole new system. And even something like that would actually play all but the most recent, super graphic intense games, at pretty high settings, too.

  • Level 7
    Sectoid
    Posts: 77
    Feb 17, 2013 5:34 pm GMT
    the_bi99man wrote:

    speedysam123 wrote:
    the_bi99man wrote:

    I'm not sure, but you might not be able to find a card that small that will handle BF3.

    Im thinking of buying a new case, im just worried about messing up when im putting the parts in the case.

    What are your other components? If they're all really low end stuff too, it might be worth it to just build a whole new system. If you just want good framerates, and don't care about maxing games out, you could probably get away with like, less than $500 for a whole new system. And even something like that would actually play all but the most recent, super graphic intense games, at pretty high settings, too.



    No my computer itself is really good, 3.7 GHz 4GB ram, It's just the video card thats the problem. I have the acer AX3950 if you can look up all my specs.
    [QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"][QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

    I'm not sure, but you might not be able to find a card that small that will handle BF3.

    [/QUOTE] Im thinking of buying a new case, im just worried about messing up when im putting the parts in the case.[/QUOTE]

    What are your other components? If they're all really low end stuff too, it might be worth it to just build a whole new system. If you just want good framerates, and don't care about maxing games out, you could probably get away with like, less than $500 for a whole new system. And even something like that would actually play all but the most recent, super graphic intense games, at pretty high settings, too.

    [/QUOTE] No my computer itself is really good, 3.7 GHz 4GB ram, It's just the video card thats the problem. I have the acer AX3950 if you can look up all my specs.
  • Level 46
    Mutoid Man
    Posts: 10692
    User is Online
    Feb 18, 2013 6:18 am GMT

    Considering how overpriced any half decent low profile cards are you'd be better spending £40 and a reasonably good case and a full size GPU.

    Considering how overpriced any half decent low profile cards are you'd be better spending £40 and a reasonably good case and a full size GPU.

  • Level 59
    Virtual Hustler
    Posts: 42290
    User is Online
    Feb 18, 2013 6:21 am GMT

    ionusX wrote:

    speedysam123 wrote:
    ionusX wrote:
    resolution?

    800x600 or 1024x768 Either one
    hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly

      Uh why not a 7850? Its more powerful, smaller and it uses less energy.. 

    ~~"Hands can't hit what your eyes can't see."~~

    Freespace 2, best game of all time.

    [QUOTE="ionusX"]

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"][QUOTE="ionusX"] resolution?

    [/QUOTE] 800x600 or 1024x768 Either one[/QUOTE] hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly

    [/QUOTE]

      Uh why not a 7850? Its more powerful, smaller and it uses less energy.. 

  • Level 58
    Death=Adder
    Posts: 25049
    User is Online
    Feb 18, 2013 11:26 am GMT

    sSubZerOo wrote:

    ionusX wrote:

    speedysam123 wrote:
    800x600 or 1024x768 Either one
    hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly

      Uh why not a 7850? Its more powerful, smaller and it uses less energy.. 

    it also costs alot more XD he wants the cheapest 

    steam id: ionus123, PSN: ionusx,BLOG

    sig

    [QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

    [QUOTE="ionusX"]

    [QUOTE="speedysam123"] 800x600 or 1024x768 Either one[/QUOTE] hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly

    [/QUOTE]

      Uh why not a 7850? Its more powerful, smaller and it uses less energy.. 

    [/QUOTE] it also costs alot more XD he wants the cheapest 

  • Level 42
    Karnov
    Posts: 1237
    User is Online
    Feb 18, 2013 12:11 pm GMT

    gtx 650-e from asus.

    microsoft: evil and hated

    apple: evil and loved

    not a serparatist anymore, i love canada as much as others canadians.

    gtx 650-e from asus.

  • Level 7
    Sectoid
    Posts: 77
    Feb 18, 2013 5:42 pm GMT
    ionusX wrote:

    sSubZerOo wrote:

    ionusX wrote:
    hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly

      Uh why not a 7850? Its more powerful, smaller and it uses less energy.. 

    it also costs alot more XD he wants the cheapest 



    It has to be a smaller video card for it to fit in my computer, i have the slim model. (Thats what she said)
    [QUOTE="ionusX"]

    [QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

    [QUOTE="ionusX"] hd 6870 will handle it on medium @ about 60fps but why are you cutting your system down so much? cutting down visuals on modern shooters makes em look fugly

    [/QUOTE]

      Uh why not a 7850? Its more powerful, smaller and it uses less energy.. 

    [/QUOTE] it also costs alot more XD he wants the cheapest 

    [/QUOTE] It has to be a smaller video card for it to fit in my computer, i have the slim model. (Thats what she said)
  • Level 41
    Thunder Force
    Posts: 3865
    User is Online
    Feb 18, 2013 6:23 pm GMT
    I was looking at getting a HD 7750 good bang for the buck.
    I was looking at getting a HD 7750 good bang for the buck.
  • Level 41
    Thunder Force
    Posts: 9325
    User is Online
    Feb 18, 2013 6:44 pm GMT
    7750 is the fastest low-profile card I know of. It should run BF3 with decent fps at low settings.


    Intel 3570K 4.4GHz | ASUS DCU II GTX 670 1150MHz | G.Skill 16GB RipjawsX 1600MHz | ASRock Z77 Fatal1ty Pro
    NZXT Matte Black Switch 810 | Corsair H110 | Corsair AX750 | Intel 520s 120GB | 4TB RAID0 + 1TB WD Greens
    BenQ XL2420T | Logitech Z-5500 | MS Sidewinder X4 | Gigabyte M8000X

    7750 is the fastest low-profile card I know of. It should run BF3 with decent fps at low settings.
  • Level 46
    Mutoid Man
    Posts: 10692
    User is Online
    Feb 19, 2013 5:31 am GMT
    C_Rule wrote:
    7750 is the fastest low-profile card I know of. It should run BF3 with decent fps at low settings.


    Maybe a mix of low and medium.
    [QUOTE="C_Rule"]7750 is the fastest low-profile card I know of. It should run BF3 with decent fps at low settings.[/QUOTE] [img]http://media.bestofmicro.com/S/X/326337/original/battlefield%203%201920.png[/img] Maybe a mix of low and medium.
  • Level 32
    Snake Eater
    Posts: 2817
    User is Online
    Feb 19, 2013 1:16 pm GMT

    kraken2109 wrote:
    C_Rule wrote:
    7750 is the fastest low-profile card I know of. It should run BF3 with decent fps at low settings.
    Maybe a mix of low and medium.

     

    That's also a MUCH higher res than he wants.

    i5-2500K Sandy Bridge 3.3GHz | Gigabyte Radeon HD 6870 1GB | Patriot Viper Xtreme 2X4GB DDR3 1866MHZ | ASUS P8Z68-V Pro GEN3 | Corsair Professional HX750W Fully Modular

    [QUOTE="kraken2109"][QUOTE="C_Rule"]7750 is the fastest low-profile card I know of. It should run BF3 with decent fps at low settings.[/QUOTE] [img]http://media.bestofmicro.com/S/X/326337/original/battlefield%203%201920.png[/img] Maybe a mix of low and medium.[/QUOTE]

     

    That's also a MUCH higher res than he wants.

Forum Actions
ForumsPC & Mac Games › Low profile video card under 220 watts t ...