System Wars is a one of a kind destination where gamers can discuss, rant, and debate about systems, platforms, handhelds and the games. Not many people survive System Wars. The mightiest system warriors back up their arguments with facts.
Rules are simple:
- Read the Terms of Use and System Wars Survival Guide.
- Must be Level 10 or higher to create topics.
- Keep your discussions around what belongs here: platforms, games, developers, publishers, and stats.
- Don't quote more than one image in your post.
- Do NOT post or bump extremely abusive discussions (adult material/illegal activities/illegal advertising/etc).
Why Cant PS3 Fans Admit the 360 has a better game library? (Proof inside)
- Feb 11, 2013 10:44 am GMT
That's usually what happens when you release an entire year prior to your competition. After 2007 "Exclusives" like Madden, Bioshock ect started to appear on the PS3. Those types of games would have been multipat day one if both systems were out.
- Feb 11, 2013 10:45 am GMT[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]
the 360 having more higher rated games than ps3 on metacritic certainly doesn't prove that the 360 has a better library than the ps3
[/QUOTE]
Of course not. That's subjective.
But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.
Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.
[/QUOTE]
metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games
[/QUOTE] It is a FACT that more critics favor 360 games. Not sure why it is so hard for you comprehend something so simple. - Feb 11, 2013 10:46 am GMTlild1425 wrote:The_Game21x wrote:lild1425 wrote:
It doesn't take a genius to realize that PS3's exclusives absolutely destroy 360's.
It baffles me when others try to say otherwise. It's really not even close.
You're don't understand how opinions work, do you?
1. The review scores are opinions, so take your confused smiley face and shove it up your ass.
2. It's pretty well standard knowledge that PS3 is known for its exclusives.
3. The library variety is just not there. While a generalization often used by forumites, the well scored 360 exclusives are shooters and racers. 360 can keep making Halos and Gears of War, which will most likely score pretty high, but there seems like little variety. They'll change a little to get the favorable reviews but even as a Halo, Forza, and Gears fan, they need some other stuff.
Anyone can manipulate numbers, but their is little variation of types. When it comes to games for different audiences and genres, it's not even ballpark close.
As you can see from my sig, I clearly own both systems, so don't start the whole fanboy bs.
Calm down sir.
Owner of a Wii/360/PS3
[QUOTE="lild1425"]
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
[QUOTE="lild1425"]
It doesn't take a genius to realize that PS3's exclusives absolutely destroy 360's.
It baffles me when others try to say otherwise. It's really not even close.
[/QUOTE]
You're don't understand how opinions work, do you? :?
[/QUOTE]
1. The review scores are opinions, so take your confused smiley face and shove it up your ass.
2. It's pretty well standard knowledge that PS3 is known for its exclusives.
3. The library variety is just not there. While a generalization often used by forumites, the well scored 360 exclusives are shooters and racers. 360 can keep making Halos and Gears of War, which will most likely score pretty high, but there seems like little variety. They'll change a little to get the favorable reviews but even as a Halo, Forza, and Gears fan, they need some other stuff.
Anyone can manipulate numbers, but their is little variation of types. When it comes to games for different audiences and genres, it's not even ballpark close.
As you can see from my sig, I clearly own both systems, so don't start the whole fanboy bs.
[/QUOTE]
Calm down sir.
- Feb 11, 2013 10:48 am GMTThe_Game21x wrote:AcidThunder wrote:The_Game21x wrote:
Of course not. That's subjective.
But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.
Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.
metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games
Which is what I just said.
Well, if you can find one, more power to you.
Good luck in your search!
no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up
From this point on, all your opinions will be rejected.[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
Of course not. That's subjective.
But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.
Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.
[/QUOTE]
metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games
[/QUOTE]
Which is what I just said. :|
Well, if you can find one, more power to you.
Good luck in your search! :)
[/QUOTE]
no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up - Feb 11, 2013 10:50 am GMT
From this point on, all your opinions will be rejected.[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="AcidThunder"]
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
Of course not. That's subjective.
But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.
Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.
[/QUOTE]
metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games
[/QUOTE] It is a FACT that more critics favor 360 games. Not sure why it is so hard for you comprehend something so simple.[/QUOTE]
and why the fvck would i care if citics favor 360 games?
- Feb 11, 2013 10:50 am GMTlild1425 wrote:The_Game21x wrote:lild1425 wrote:
1. The review scores are opinions, so take your confused smiley face and shove it up your ass.
2. It's pretty well standard knowledge that PS3 is known for its exclusives.
3. The library variety is just not there. While a generalization often used by forumites, the well scored 360 exclusives are shooters and racers. 360 can keep making Halos and Gears of War, which will most likely score pretty high, but there seems like little variety. They'll change a little to get the favorable reviews but even as a Halo, Forza, and Gears fan, they need some other stuff.
Anyone can manipulate numbers, but their is little variation of types. When it comes to games for different audiences and genres, it's not even ballpark close.
As you can see from my sig, I clearly own both systems, so don't start the whole fanboy bs.
Wow, someone's mad.
Your opinion of the PS3's exclusives "destroying" the Xbox 360's is just that, an opinion. If you weren't trying to pass off your silly fanboy nonsense (I don't care if you own both systems) as fact, it wouldn't be an issue.
Good for you, you think the PS3's exclusives are better than the 360's. But, that's just your opinion and no one is wrong for disagreeing or believing the reverse.
Nothing is more infuriating then condescending smileys especially when coming from someone that is being half retarded.
The entire topic is an opinion genius..."Admit the 360 has a better library". It says better not higher rated. Better can mean varied; it can mean higher scores; it can be both; it can be both with a ton of other variables. On a sidenote, 'facts' are pretty good at being manipulated, especially statistics. For example: step outside and see the world.
The PS3 is known for its exclusives and is probably its biggest selling point. I guess it was somewhat shortsighted on my own part to think this was somewhat unanimous as many gamers than own both agree that the PS3 exclusive library is significantly stronger, but still like what 360 offers based on their gaming preferences. Looking at the library, I see a ton of quality games from different genres.
Also, from your other posts you say Metacritic scores are not objective. THEY ARE OPINIONS. Please stop this nonsense unless Metacritic is accepting reviews from God.
I think anyone with any rationality would consider a game console with the most amount of high rated games as generally "better". If your opinion is different from that its fine but it is in the minority.
The PS3 does generally release a lot of exclusives, but there are EVEN MORE 360/PC games that the 360 gamers get to play that the PS3 fans dont that are very awesome/diverse games that are a huge advantage for the 360.
The 360 has what any rational person would call a "better" game library and thats the bottom line.
I dont understand why it is so hard for PS3 fans to say "yeah, the 360 does have what most people would consider to be a better game library, but I prefer the PS3's".[QUOTE="lild1425"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
[QUOTE="lild1425"]
1. The review scores are opinions, so take your confused smiley face and shove it up your ass.
2. It's pretty well standard knowledge that PS3 is known for its exclusives.
3. The library variety is just not there. While a generalization often used by forumites, the well scored 360 exclusives are shooters and racers. 360 can keep making Halos and Gears of War, which will most likely score pretty high, but there seems like little variety. They'll change a little to get the favorable reviews but even as a Halo, Forza, and Gears fan, they need some other stuff.
Anyone can manipulate numbers, but their is little variation of types. When it comes to games for different audiences and genres, it's not even ballpark close.
As you can see from my sig, I clearly own both systems, so don't start the whole fanboy bs.
[/QUOTE]
Wow, someone's mad. :lol:
Your opinion of the PS3's exclusives "destroying" the Xbox 360's is just that, an opinion. If you weren't trying to pass off your silly fanboy nonsense (I don't care if you own both systems) as fact, it wouldn't be an issue.
Good for you, you think the PS3's exclusives are better than the 360's. But, that's just your opinion and no one is wrong for disagreeing or believing the reverse.
[/QUOTE]
Nothing is more infuriating then condescending smileys especially when coming from someone that is being half retarded.
The entire topic is an opinion genius..."Admit the 360 has a better library". It says better not higher rated. Better can mean varied; it can mean higher scores; it can be both; it can be both with a ton of other variables. On a sidenote, 'facts' are pretty good at being manipulated, especially statistics. For example: step outside and see the world.
The PS3 is known for its exclusives and is probably its biggest selling point. I guess it was somewhat shortsighted on my own part to think this was somewhat unanimous as many gamers than own both agree that the PS3 exclusive library is significantly stronger, but still like what 360 offers based on their gaming preferences. Looking at the library, I see a ton of quality games from different genres.
Also, from your other posts you say Metacritic scores are not objective. THEY ARE OPINIONS. Please stop this nonsense unless Metacritic is accepting reviews from God.
[/QUOTE] I think anyone with any rationality would consider a game console with the most amount of high rated games as generally "better". If your opinion is different from that its fine but it is in the minority. The PS3 does generally release a lot of exclusives, but there are EVEN MORE 360/PC games that the 360 gamers get to play that the PS3 fans dont that are very awesome/diverse games that are a huge advantage for the 360. The 360 has what any rational person would call a "better" game library and thats the bottom line. I dont understand why it is so hard for PS3 fans to say "yeah, the 360 does have what most people would consider to be a better game library, but I prefer the PS3's". - Feb 11, 2013 10:51 am GMT
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="AcidThunder"]
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
Of course not. That's subjective.
But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.
Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.
[/QUOTE]
metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games
[/QUOTE] It is a FACT that more critics favor 360 games. Not sure why it is so hard for you comprehend something so simple.[/QUOTE]
But what you are saying is that: "It is a fact that the summation of opinions on Metacritic is higher for the 360". That's like saying "It is a fact that all the popes in the Vatican have the opinion that global warming does not exist" but that does not necessarily mean that they are correct. Sorry, this is getting too philosphical and shouldn't be. Consumerism will decide what people like and people will buy what they like.
Also, I want to see the TCs work. Games like ME that were once exclusives are not anymore.
- Feb 11, 2013 10:52 am GMTThe_Game21x wrote:Gue1 wrote:Miketheman83 wrote:If you read the original post it clearly shows there are more games on the 360 rated 90 or higher.
is not that there are more is that sometimes high reviews that are for both games are only posted for the X360 version and not for the PS3 and even though is the same game there are many instances when the score is inflated because of that. Then we have first gen games like Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter which came out on Xbox but not on PS3 because the system wasn't even out untile a year later. And another thing are the crappy indie XBL games with only 10-15 reviews scoring triple A mostly because of Xbox dedicated websites.
Wow, just look at all those excuses!
And regarding the "crappy" indie XBL games receiving high scores from Xbox sites, the same could be said for just about every PS3 exclusive as well.
He says as he masturbates, and plays the only AA+ exclusive the PS3 had in 2012, GOTY Journey 12 more times.
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
[QUOTE="Gue1"]
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] If you read the original post it clearly shows there are more games on the 360 rated 90 or higher.[/QUOTE]
is not that there are more is that sometimes high reviews that are for both games are only posted for the X360 version and not for the PS3 and even though is the same game there are many instances when the score is inflated because of that. Then we have first gen games like Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter which came out on Xbox but not on PS3 because the system wasn't even out untile a year later. And another thing are the crappy indie XBL games with only 10-15 reviews scoring triple A mostly because of Xbox dedicated websites. :)
[/QUOTE]
Wow, just look at all those excuses! :shock:
And regarding the "crappy" indie XBL games receiving high scores from Xbox sites, the same could be said for just about every PS3 exclusive as well.
[/QUOTE]
He says as he masturbates, and plays the only AA+ exclusive the PS3 had in 2012, GOTY Journey 12 more times. :roll:
- Feb 11, 2013 10:52 am GMTAcidThunder wrote:The_Game21x wrote:AcidThunder wrote:
metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games
Which is what I just said.
Well, if you can find one, more power to you.
Good luck in your search!
no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up
Well I dont think I would consider people who study games for a living opinions pointless. Im just pointing out that the majority if the world prefers 360 games and Im a little curious why PS3 fans cant admit it.[QUOTE="AcidThunder"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]
metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games
[/QUOTE]
Which is what I just said. :|
Well, if you can find one, more power to you.
Good luck in your search! :)
[/QUOTE]
no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
[/QUOTE] Well I dont think I would consider people who study games for a living opinions pointless. Im just pointing out that the majority if the world prefers 360 games and Im a little curious why PS3 fans cant admit it.
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up - Feb 11, 2013 10:53 am GMTAcidThunder wrote:The_Game21x wrote:AcidThunder wrote:
metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games
Which is what I just said.
Well, if you can find one, more power to you.
Good luck in your search!
no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming upYou're clearly not understanding what I said. I said the Metacritic scores themselves aren't facts but that it is a fact that the 360 has more high scoring games, as anyone can determine for themselves by simply going to Metacritic and counting the number of 70+, 80+ or 90+ games available for both the 360 and PS3.
The Metacritic scores themselves are subjective but the number of scores on the 360 and PS3 are not. Numbers don't lie and the numbers state that the 360 has more high scoring games than the PS3. Period.
The Mind of Game | Musical Musings | GUFUyourself | GS Blog | GUFUYourself Forum
Game's Biggest Fans: Slashless, Clock-W0rk, ReadingRainbow4 | Check out GUFUyourself! We Write Reviews and Stuff![QUOTE="AcidThunder"]
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]
metacritic scores =/= facts. just like metacritic has more higher rated 360 games, in the same way there can and should be some other site that has more higher rated ps3 games
[/QUOTE]
Which is what I just said. :|
Well, if you can find one, more power to you.
Good luck in your search! :)
[/QUOTE]
no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up[/QUOTE]
You're clearly not understanding what I said. I said the Metacritic scores themselves aren't facts but that it is a fact that the 360 has more high scoring games, as anyone can determine for themselves by simply going to Metacritic and counting the number of 70+, 80+ or 90+ games available for both the 360 and PS3.
The Metacritic scores themselves are subjective but the number of scores on the 360 and PS3 are not. Numbers don't lie and the numbers state that the 360 has more high scoring games than the PS3. Period.
- Feb 11, 2013 10:54 am GMT
a sense of butthurt and burning beef burgers permeates the air - Feb 11, 2013 10:54 am GMT
3 for sight. 2 for sound. 1 for the touch. And you're out for the count.
Let teh kitten spin yur mind.Oh all those fantastic 360 games that we already have.
- Feb 11, 2013 10:56 am GMT
Where is this proof I was promised?? - Feb 11, 2013 10:57 am GMT
[/QUOTE] I think anyone with any rationality would consider a game console with the most amount of high rated games as generally "better". If your opinion is different from that its fine but it is in the minority. The PS3 does generally release a lot of exclusives, but there are EVEN MORE 360/PC games that the 360 gamers get to play that the PS3 fans dont that are very awesome/diverse games that are a huge advantage for the 360. The 360 has what any rational person would call a "better" game library and thats the bottom line. I dont understand why it is so hard for PS3 fans to say "yeah, the 360 does have what most people would consider to be a better game library, but I prefer the PS3's".[/QUOTE]
It's weird because I came in thinking the exact opposite and I thought it was widely true for most people but maybe not. I've considered myself an xbox fan, but this gen I take a look at the libraries and I felt like the PS3s was far and away better.
The "Better library" is not as simple as it seems. Hypothetically, I could release a system that releases only Halo games that get 9.5 scores every time, but I wouldn't say that the library is better compared to one that has a varied one that still scores in the AAA range.
- Feb 11, 2013 10:57 am GMT
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
They are. Where did I say they weren't?
I said the 360 has more high rated games than the PS3, which is a verifiable fact, not that the reviews themselves were facts in and of themselves.
[/QUOTE]
the 360 having more higher rated games than ps3 on metacritic certainly doesn't prove that the 360 has a better library than the ps3
[/QUOTE]
Of course not. That's subjective.
But objectively, according to Metacritic, the 360 has far more high rated games. People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face.
Well, they can and do every time they say the 360 has "no games" but whatever.
[/QUOTE]
Care to explain why the 360 side has repeat games like GTA TBOGT which was never released on PS3 as a single game, then you have a bunch of DLC titles, and multiplats shared with PS2. Bottom line, once you break the numbers down, its not as appealing unless you just want to play with numbers. Especially considering the exclusive AAA games have little variety hence Halo Gears Forza. Compare that to PS3s exclusives and its no competition unless youre a diehard for Halo and Gears.
- Feb 11, 2013 10:59 am GMTThe_Game21x wrote:AcidThunder wrote:The_Game21x wrote:
Which is what I just said.
Well, if you can find one, more power to you.
Good luck in your search!
no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming upYou're clearly not understanding what I said. I said the Metacritic scores themselves aren't facts but that it is a fact that the 360 has more high scoring games, as anyone can determine for themselves by simply going to Metacritic and counting the number of 70+, 80+ or 90+ games available for both the 360 and PS3.
The Metacritic scores themselves are subjective but the number of scores on the 360 and PS3 are not. Numbers don't lie and the numbers state that the 360 has more high scoring games than the PS3. Period.
and you are not understanding what i am saying. just because the more 360 games have a higher score on metacritic, doesn't mean that it is the absolute rule. metacritic is in no way the 'sacred book of gaming' or something. it is just another single plain site
From this point on, all your opinions will be rejected.[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
Which is what I just said. :|
Well, if you can find one, more power to you.
Good luck in your search! :)
[/QUOTE]
no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up[/QUOTE]
You're clearly not understanding what I said. I said the Metacritic scores themselves aren't facts but that it is a fact that the 360 has more high scoring games, as anyone can determine for themselves by simply going to Metacritic and counting the number of 70+, 80+ or 90+ games available for both the 360 and PS3.
The Metacritic scores themselves are subjective but the number of scores on the 360 and PS3 are not. Numbers don't lie and the numbers state that the 360 has more high scoring games than the PS3. Period.
[/QUOTE]
and you are not understanding what i am saying. just because the more 360 games have a higher score on metacritic, doesn't mean that it is the absolute rule. metacritic is in no way the 'sacred book of gaming' or something. it is just another single plain site
- Feb 11, 2013 11:01 am GMTThe_Game21x wrote:AcidThunder wrote:The_Game21x wrote:
Which is what I just said.
Well, if you can find one, more power to you.
Good luck in your search!
no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming upYou're clearly not understanding what I said. I said the Metacritic scores themselves aren't facts but that it is a fact that the 360 has more high scoring games, as anyone can determine for themselves by simply going to Metacritic and counting the number of 70+, 80+ or 90+ games available for both the 360 and PS3.
The Metacritic scores themselves are subjective but the number of scores on the 360 and PS3 are not. Numbers don't lie and the numbers state that the 360 has more high scoring games than the PS3. Period.
Take a statistics course; numbers are mean inventions. Apparently Jennifer Aniston is over 40. I call bs.
But this whole discussion seems to rely on a quantity vs. quality basis. A system could have a high scoring game that is an arcade style XBL game. Is that score just as good as a retail game with an identical score on the opposing system?
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
[QUOTE="AcidThunder"]
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
Which is what I just said. :|
Well, if you can find one, more power to you.
Good luck in your search! :)
[/QUOTE]
no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up[/QUOTE]
You're clearly not understanding what I said. I said the Metacritic scores themselves aren't facts but that it is a fact that the 360 has more high scoring games, as anyone can determine for themselves by simply going to Metacritic and counting the number of 70+, 80+ or 90+ games available for both the 360 and PS3.
The Metacritic scores themselves are subjective but the number of scores on the 360 and PS3 are not. Numbers don't lie and the numbers state that the 360 has more high scoring games than the PS3. Period.
[/QUOTE]
Take a statistics course; numbers are mean inventions. Apparently Jennifer Aniston is over 40. I call bs.
But this whole discussion seems to rely on a quantity vs. quality basis. A system could have a high scoring game that is an arcade style XBL game. Is that score just as good as a retail game with an identical score on the opposing system?
- Feb 11, 2013 11:02 am GMTStrongDeadlift wrote:The_Game21x wrote:Gue1 wrote:
is not that there are more is that sometimes high reviews that are for both games are only posted for the X360 version and not for the PS3 and even though is the same game there are many instances when the score is inflated because of that. Then we have first gen games like Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter which came out on Xbox but not on PS3 because the system wasn't even out untile a year later. And another thing are the crappy indie XBL games with only 10-15 reviews scoring triple A mostly because of Xbox dedicated websites.
Wow, just look at all those excuses!
And regarding the "crappy" indie XBL games receiving high scores from Xbox sites, the same could be said for just about every PS3 exclusive as well.
He says as he masturbates, and plays the only AA+ exclusive the PS3 had in 2012, GOTY Journey 12 more times.
Time to play the card Lems play. What about all the awesome multiplats PS3 recieved? Its not like PS3 was without great games, right?
[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
[QUOTE="Gue1"]
is not that there are more is that sometimes high reviews that are for both games are only posted for the X360 version and not for the PS3 and even though is the same game there are many instances when the score is inflated because of that. Then we have first gen games like Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter which came out on Xbox but not on PS3 because the system wasn't even out untile a year later. And another thing are the crappy indie XBL games with only 10-15 reviews scoring triple A mostly because of Xbox dedicated websites. :)
[/QUOTE]
Wow, just look at all those excuses! :shock:
And regarding the "crappy" indie XBL games receiving high scores from Xbox sites, the same could be said for just about every PS3 exclusive as well.
[/QUOTE]
He says as he masturbates, and plays the only AA+ exclusive the PS3 had in 2012, GOTY Journey 12 more times. :roll:
[/QUOTE]
Time to play the card Lems play. What about all the awesome multiplats PS3 recieved? Its not like PS3 was without great games, right?
- Feb 11, 2013 11:03 am GMTMiketheman83 wrote:Well I dont think I would consider people who study games for a living opinions pointless. Im just pointing out that the majority if the world prefers 360 games and Im a little curious why PS3 fans cant admit it.AcidThunder wrote:The_Game21x wrote:
Which is what I just said.
Well, if you can find one, more power to you.
Good luck in your search!
no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming upsince when did reviewers on gaming websites started 'studying' games? they are gamers just like us and no their opinion isn't above mine or yours or anybody for that matter.
and who said that the majority of the world prefers 360 games?
From this point on, all your opinions will be rejected.[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="AcidThunder"]
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]
Which is what I just said. :|
Well, if you can find one, more power to you.
Good luck in your search! :)
[/QUOTE]
no you didn't say that. you said, "People don't have to agree that the 360's library is better but they can't deny the facts that are right in front of their face."
the only 'facts' in front of us here are metacritic scores
and i am not really gonna search for such a site (though i am postive that atleast one such exists) because i have got a mathematics exam coming up[/QUOTE] Well I dont think I would consider people who study games for a living opinions pointless. Im just pointing out that the majority if the world prefers 360 games and Im a little curious why PS3 fans cant admit it.[/QUOTE]
since when did reviewers on gaming websites started 'studying' games? they are gamers just like us and no their opinion isn't above mine or yours or anybody for that matter.
and who said that the majority of the world prefers 360 games?
