Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsOff-Topic Discussion › Reagan's Childhood Home To Be Bulldozed ...

The Classic Off-Topic forum is a place where games or platforms discussions are taboo. Here, you can talk about just about anything outside of games, just make sure to stay classy and follow the rules.

Forum Rules:
- Follow the Terms of Use and read the FAQ.
- Keep your discussions friendly and respectful of others.
- Keep the discussions work friendly. More details in the FAQ (For something more laid back go to Off Topic: After Hours
- Game and platform discussions NOT allowed (For that go to the Primary Games Board or System Wars.
- Do NOT post or bump extremely abusive discussions.
- Hate speech not permitted.

Reagan's Childhood Home To Be Bulldozed for Obama Public Library

Forum Actions
Do you approve?
Yes
72% [75]
No
28% [29]
Total Votes: 104

(Note: you must be a registered member to participate in polls. Sign in or sign up now!)

  • Level 45
    Mishima Zaibatsu
    Posts: 6780
    User is Online
    Feb 1, 2013 7:40 am GMT
    worlock77 wrote:

    DaBrainz wrote:
    worlock77 wrote:

    Then it's a good thing that this has nothing to do with a public library afterall.

    Oh, TC wrote public library not presidential library. Point still stands. Building public shrines in the name of US presidents is also antiquated.

    Then it's a good thing this has nothing to do with a presidential library ether.



    That's what the article in the OP is about.
    [QUOTE="worlock77"]

    [QUOTE="DaBrainz"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

    Then it's a good thing that this has nothing to do with a public library afterall.

    [/QUOTE] Oh, TC wrote public library not presidential library. Point still stands. Building public shrines in the name of US presidents is also antiquated.[/QUOTE]

    Then it's a good thing this has nothing to do with a presidential library ether.

    [/QUOTE] That's what the article in the OP is about.
  • Level 47
    Jaquio
    Posts: 20692
    Feb 1, 2013 7:46 am GMT

    DaBrainz wrote:
    worlock77 wrote:

    DaBrainz wrote:
    Oh, TC wrote public library not presidential library. Point still stands. Building public shrines in the name of US presidents is also antiquated.

    Then it's a good thing this has nothing to do with a presidential library ether.

    That's what the article in the OP is about.

    And the article in the OP is staggeringly full of sh*t. Notice how KingKong hasn't come back into the thread to even try to defend it?

    Laihendi wrote:
    Atlas Shrugged is an objective representation of the real world in the form of a novel.

    [QUOTE="DaBrainz"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

    [QUOTE="DaBrainz"] Oh, TC wrote public library not presidential library. Point still stands. Building public shrines in the name of US presidents is also antiquated.[/QUOTE]

    Then it's a good thing this has nothing to do with a presidential library ether.

    [/QUOTE] That's what the article in the OP is about.[/QUOTE]

    And the article in the OP is staggeringly full of sh*t. Notice how KingKong hasn't come back into the thread to even try to defend it?

  • Level 45
    Mishima Zaibatsu
    Posts: 6780
    User is Online
    Feb 1, 2013 7:50 am GMT
    worlock77 wrote:

    DaBrainz wrote:
    worlock77 wrote:

    Then it's a good thing this has nothing to do with a presidential library ether.

    That's what the article in the OP is about.

    And the article in the OP is staggeringly full of sh*t. Notice how KingKong hasn't come back into the thread to even try to defend it?



    So?
    [QUOTE="worlock77"]

    [QUOTE="DaBrainz"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

    Then it's a good thing this has nothing to do with a presidential library ether.

    [/QUOTE] That's what the article in the OP is about.[/QUOTE]

    And the article in the OP is staggeringly full of sh*t. Notice how KingKong hasn't come back into the thread to even try to defend it?

    [/QUOTE] So?
  • Level 47
    Jaquio
    Posts: 20692
    Feb 1, 2013 7:55 am GMT

    DaBrainz wrote:
    worlock77 wrote:

    DaBrainz wrote:
    That's what the article in the OP is about.

    And the article in the OP is staggeringly full of sh*t. Notice how KingKong hasn't come back into the thread to even try to defend it?

    So?

    The information posted in the OP is flat out false. The University of Chicago purchased the building and plans to demolish to to expand their science facilities. Nothing to do with a library (public or presidential) or Obama.

    Laihendi wrote:
    Atlas Shrugged is an objective representation of the real world in the form of a novel.

    [QUOTE="DaBrainz"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

    [QUOTE="DaBrainz"] That's what the article in the OP is about.[/QUOTE]

    And the article in the OP is staggeringly full of sh*t. Notice how KingKong hasn't come back into the thread to even try to defend it?

    [/QUOTE] So?[/QUOTE]

    The information posted in the OP is flat out false. The University of Chicago purchased the building and plans to demolish to to expand their science facilities. Nothing to do with a library (public or presidential) or Obama.

  • Level 45
    Mishima Zaibatsu
    Posts: 6780
    User is Online
    Feb 1, 2013 8:00 am GMT
    worlock77 wrote:

    DaBrainz wrote:
    worlock77 wrote:

    And the article in the OP is staggeringly full of sh*t. Notice how KingKong hasn't come back into the thread to even try to defend it?

    So?

    The information posted in the OP is flat out false. The University of Chicago purchased the building and plans to demolish to to expand their science facilities. Nothing to do with a library (public or presidential) or Obama.



    Science is anti-republican.
    [QUOTE="worlock77"]

    [QUOTE="DaBrainz"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

    And the article in the OP is staggeringly full of sh*t. Notice how KingKong hasn't come back into the thread to even try to defend it?

    [/QUOTE] So?[/QUOTE]

    The information posted in the OP is flat out false. The University of Chicago purchased the building and plans to demolish to to expand their science facilities. Nothing to do with a library (public or presidential) or Obama.

    [/QUOTE] Science is anti-republican.
  • Level 32
    Snake Eater
    Posts: 3243
    Feb 1, 2013 8:09 am GMT

    DaBrainz wrote:
    worlock77 wrote:

    DaBrainz wrote:
    So?

    The information posted in the OP is flat out false. The University of Chicago purchased the building and plans to demolish to to expand their science facilities. Nothing to do with a library (public or presidential) or Obama.

    Science is anti-republican.

    lol, very true

    -----------------------------------------------------------

    "They say that dreams are only real as long as they last. Couldn't you say the same thing about life?"

    -Waking Life

    PSN: JoeBiden420

    [QUOTE="DaBrainz"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

    [QUOTE="DaBrainz"] So?[/QUOTE]

    The information posted in the OP is flat out false. The University of Chicago purchased the building and plans to demolish to to expand their science facilities. Nothing to do with a library (public or presidential) or Obama.

    [/QUOTE] Science is anti-republican.[/QUOTE]

    lol, very true

  • Level 45
    Mishima Zaibatsu
    Posts: 8121
    User is Online
    Feb 1, 2013 8:12 am GMT

    DaBrainz wrote:
    worlock77 wrote:

    DaBrainz wrote:
    So?

    The information posted in the OP is flat out false. The University of Chicago purchased the building and plans to demolish to to expand their science facilities. Nothing to do with a library (public or presidential) or Obama.

    Science is anti-republican.

    Lol, this is easily the best post I've ever seen you make.

    -------------

    Laihendi wrote:
    The notion that children are entitled to benefit from government services designed exclusively for them at the expense of taxpaying adults is absurd and is a manifestation of the moocher welfare mentality that is a plague in this society. It is the responsibility of parents to raise children, not government and not taxpayers either.

    Says the kid that goes to a public university.

    [QUOTE="DaBrainz"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

    [QUOTE="DaBrainz"] So?[/QUOTE]

    The information posted in the OP is flat out false. The University of Chicago purchased the building and plans to demolish to to expand their science facilities. Nothing to do with a library (public or presidential) or Obama.

    [/QUOTE] Science is anti-republican.[/QUOTE]

    Lol, this is easily the best post I've ever seen you make.

  • Level 43
    Sword of Sodan
    Posts: 17012
    User is Online
    Feb 1, 2013 8:13 am GMT
    Laihendi wrote:
    Obama has no respect for this country's history or for its past leaders. He only cares about change. He only cares about moving "forward" to his collectivist dystopia. He wants people to forget what happened before him. He wants people to forget that things can be different, and were different.

    Wow, you managed to contradict yourself in such a small paragraph. If he's about change then he would want people to remember the difference, wouldn't he?

    You are proof.

    That emotions destroy you.

    [QUOTE="Laihendi"]Obama has no respect for this country's history or for its past leaders. He only cares about change. He only cares about moving "forward" to his collectivist dystopia. He wants people to forget what happened before him. He wants people to forget that things can be different, and were different.[/QUOTE] Wow, you managed to contradict yourself in such a small paragraph. If he's about change then he would want people to remember the difference, wouldn't he?
  • Level 72
    King of All Cosmos
    Posts: 145977
    User is Online
    Feb 1, 2013 8:24 am GMT
    21 people think this building is important? Damn.....

    21 people think this building is important? Damn.....
  • Level 35
    Stitches
    Posts: 4312
    User is Online
    Feb 1, 2013 8:26 am GMT

    Is OP a troll? He makes this thread and when he get's proved wrong beyond destruction, he doesn't reply. Seems like he's just here to create chaos.

    ---------------------------------------------------

    Only in war, are we truly faithful-Chaplain.

    Is OP a troll? He makes this thread and when he get's proved wrong beyond destruction, he doesn't reply. Seems like he's just here to create chaos.

  • Level 47
    Jaquio
    Posts: 20692
    Feb 1, 2013 8:28 am GMT

    LJS9502_basic wrote:
    21 people think this building is important? Damn.....

    Reagan learned how to use the big boy potty there. Clearly this building is an important historic landmark.

    Laihendi wrote:
    Atlas Shrugged is an objective representation of the real world in the form of a novel.

    [QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]21 people think this building is important? Damn.....[/QUOTE]

    Reagan learned how to use the big boy potty there. Clearly this building is an important historic landmark.

  • Level 72
    King of All Cosmos
    Posts: 145977
    User is Online
    Feb 1, 2013 8:34 am GMT
    worlock77 wrote:

    LJS9502_basic wrote:
    21 people think this building is important? Damn.....

    Reagan learned how to use the big boy potty there. Clearly this building is an important historic landmark.


    Hmmm.....I see why they want to keep it. It proved he was full of sh*t.

    [QUOTE="worlock77"]

    [QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]21 people think this building is important? Damn.....[/QUOTE]

    Reagan learned how to use the big boy potty there. Clearly this building is an important historic landmark.

    [/QUOTE] Hmmm.....I see why they want to keep it. It proved he was full of sh*t.
  • Level 64
    Easter Egg
    Posts: 16790
    Feb 1, 2013 9:12 am GMT
    Rhazakna wrote:
    BossPerson wrote:

    Rhazanka,

    briefly, whats your general opinion of chomsky? 


    He has some good things to say, and his research on the connections between corporations and political groups is very thorough and well-researched. He also has many contradictory opinions. He'll talk about how the State is what creates maintains corporate power (as his own research shows), but will then say that the State is the only thing protecting us from corporate tyranny. In general, he buys into the mainstream leftist idea that State power and corporate power are separate entities, instead of part of the same power structure (this idea is also supported by rightists, but from the opposite perspective). The research he's done contradicts this, but he doesn't internalize the implications of that.

    I don't think this is a fair take on Chomsky's views, his support of various state initiatives are a lot more nuanced than him just him buying into some idea about state power and corporate power being completely separate entities. The defining attribute of Chomsky's political activism is that he never asks for the moon - he does not waste his time writing long treatises about unrealistic anarchist goals, and this is something that he has talked about directly. To him such radical idealism amounts to nothing more than mere academic seminars that have no hope of having any real world influence any time soon. So to be relevant and not ignore the immediate problems that society faces in today's world he advocates policies along the lines of the existing political paradigm. It's not so much that these are "contradictions" as much as they are examples of him just being pragmatic.
    [QUOTE="Rhazakna"][QUOTE="BossPerson"]

    Rhazanka,

    briefly, whats your general opinion of chomsky? 

    [/QUOTE] He has some good things to say, and his research on the connections between corporations and political groups is very thorough and well-researched. He also has many contradictory opinions. He'll talk about how the State is what creates maintains corporate power (as his own research shows), but will then say that the State is the only thing protecting us from corporate tyranny. [b]In general, he buys into the mainstream leftist idea that State power and corporate power are separate entities, instead of part of the same power structure[/b] (this idea is also supported by rightists, but from the opposite perspective). The research he's done contradicts this, but he doesn't internalize the implications of that.[/QUOTE] I don't think this is a fair take on Chomsky's views, his support of various state initiatives are a lot more nuanced than him just him buying into some idea about state power and corporate power being completely separate entities. The defining attribute of Chomsky's political activism is that he never asks for the moon - he does not waste his time writing long treatises about unrealistic anarchist goals, and this is something that he has talked about directly. To him such radical idealism amounts to nothing more than mere academic seminars that have no hope of having any real world influence any time soon. So to be relevant and not ignore the immediate problems that society faces in today's world he advocates policies along the lines of the existing political paradigm. It's not so much that these are "contradictions" as much as they are examples of him just being pragmatic.
  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 26020
    User is Online
    Feb 1, 2013 9:55 am GMT
    Really? This lie of an article deserves 8 pages of discussion?

    Hopefully I stay here in a ball of fire

    flyingkiwi_270307_232.jpg always chase your dreams picture by Serraph105(always chase your dreams)

    You're my sunshine

    Really? This lie of an article deserves 8 pages of discussion?
  • Level 39
    Max Force
    Posts: 6450
    User is Online
    Feb 1, 2013 10:10 am GMT

    lol

    Laihendi wrote:
    I do not need to take a course on logic. I have read Atlas Shrugged.

    [IMG]http://i48.tinypic.com/2igc3kz.jpg[/IMG]

    lol

  • Level 47
    Jaquio
    Posts: 20692
    Feb 1, 2013 10:49 am GMT

    Blood-Scribe wrote:

    lol

    Laihendi wrote:
    Atlas Shrugged is an objective representation of the real world in the form of a novel.

    [QUOTE="Blood-Scribe"]

    [IMG]http://i48.tinypic.com/2igc3kz.jpg[/IMG]

    lol

    [/QUOTE]

    :lol:

  • Level 52
    Spoony Bard
    Posts: 14203
    User is Online
    Feb 1, 2013 11:29 am GMT
    Serraph105 wrote:
    Really? This lie of an article deserves 8 pages of discussion?


    Why wouldn't it? It's funny.

    [QUOTE="Serraph105"]Really? This lie of an article deserves 8 pages of discussion?[/QUOTE] Why wouldn't it? It's funny.
  • Level 32
    Snake Eater
    Posts: 3243
    Feb 1, 2013 12:39 pm GMT

    Blood-Scribe wrote:

    lol

    hahaha I want to see TC respond to this

    -----------------------------------------------------------

    "They say that dreams are only real as long as they last. Couldn't you say the same thing about life?"

    -Waking Life

    PSN: JoeBiden420

    [QUOTE="Blood-Scribe"]

    [IMG]http://i48.tinypic.com/2igc3kz.jpg[/IMG]

    lol

    [/QUOTE]

    hahaha I want to see TC respond to this

  • Level 26
    Cyber-Lip
    Posts: 3238
    Feb 1, 2013 12:51 pm GMT
    Abbeten wrote:
    that's hilarious if true

    Laihendi wrote:
    Obama has no respect for this country's history or for its past leaders. He only cares about change. He only cares about moving "forward" to his collectivist dystopia. He wants people to forget what happened before him. He wants people to forget that things can be different, and were different.

    tagyhag wrote:
    "The "childhood home" is an apartment Reagan lived in for less than a year as a young child, and its planned demolition is part of an expansion by the University of Chicago that has nothing to do with President Obama's presidential library. Obama hasn't chosen which state his presidential library will eventually be in, let alone where people will need to park for it."

    lol

    OT
    [QUOTE="Abbeten"]that's hilarious if true[/QUOTE] [QUOTE="Laihendi"]Obama has no respect for this country's history or for its past leaders. He only cares about change. He only cares about moving "forward" to his collectivist dystopia. He wants people to forget what happened before him. He wants people to forget that things can be different, and were different.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE="tagyhag"]"The "childhood home" is an apartment Reagan lived in for less than a year as a young child, and its planned demolition is part of an expansion by the University of Chicago that has nothing to do with President Obama's presidential library. Obama hasn't chosen which state his presidential library will eventually be in, let alone where people will need to park for it." lol[/QUOTE] :lol: OT
  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 13782
    User is Online
    Feb 1, 2013 1:18 pm GMT

    Blood-Scribe wrote:

    lol

    And my day is made.

    Now Playing: Atelier Totori Plus, Wipeout 2048, Bit.Trip Series

    DOCTOR WHO 50th ANNIVERSARY!!!!!!!

    [QUOTE="Blood-Scribe"]

    [IMG]http://i48.tinypic.com/2igc3kz.jpg[/IMG]

    lol

    [/QUOTE]

    And my day is made. :)

Forum Actions
ForumsOff-Topic Discussion › Reagan's Childhood Home To Be Bulldozed ...