System Wars is a one of a kind destination where gamers can discuss, rant, and debate about systems, platforms, handhelds and the games. Not many people survive System Wars. The mightiest system warriors back up their arguments with facts.
Rules are simple:
- Read the Terms of Use and System Wars Survival Guide.
- Must be Level 10 or higher to create topics.
- Keep your discussions around what belongs here: platforms, games, developers, publishers, and stats.
- Don't quote more than one image in your post.
- Do NOT post or bump extremely abusive discussions (adult material/illegal activities/illegal advertising/etc).
GTA V confirmed for PC
- Jan 29, 2013 1:53 pm GMTRR360DD wrote:"could be a mistype" Keep begging herms
......
No.
Gaming PC - Xbox 360 250GB
[QUOTE="RR360DD"]"could be a mistype" Keep begging herms :lol:[/QUOTE]
......
No.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 1:53 pm GMTSkyrim? Thatīs the worst possible comparison you couldīve made,especially when the PC version is by far the best oneMiketheman83 wrote:I don't needed budget figures to tell a game has lite production values, all I have to do is play it. Look at a game like Witcher 2 compared to Skyrim. It's pretty obvious. I've played both games by the way.lundy86_4 wrote:Miketheman83 wrote:A few games with high budgets (still no where near the budgets of top console games) doesn't really help you're argument. Most PC games have very low budgets and are very disjointed niche games.
A couple of points you're going to need to prove, after you first define what "low-budget" and "high-budget" are, explicitly. Now, to the points:
- Prove all PC games have "low-budgets".
- Prove that they have nowhere near the budget of top console games.
Now, in your last sentence, you change your argument to "most", rather than "all".
----
I have to say, your argument is tremendously lackluster.
Edited on Jan 29, 2013 1:57 pm GMT
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] A few games with high budgets (still no where near the budgets of top console games) doesn't really help you're argument. Most PC games have very low budgets and are very disjointed niche games.[/QUOTE]
A couple of points you're going to need to prove, after you first define what "low-budget" and "high-budget" are, explicitly. Now, to the points:
- Prove all PC games have "low-budgets".
- Prove that they have nowhere near the budget of top console games.
Now, in your last sentence, you change your argument to "most", rather than "all".
----
I have to say, your argument is tremendously lackluster.
[/QUOTE] I don't needed budget figures to tell a game has lite production values, all I have to do is play it. Look at a game like Witcher 2 compared to Skyrim. It's pretty obvious. I've played both games by the way.[/QUOTE] Skyrim? Thatīs the worst possible comparison you couldīve made,especially when the PC version is by far the best one :lol:
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 1:55 pm GMT
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"]I don't need budget figures to tell a game has low production values, all I have to do is play it. Look at a game like Witcher 2 compared to Skyrim. It's pretty obvious. I've played both games by the way.
[/QUOTE]
Ahhh, so you aren't willing to properly form your own argument, let alone provide evidence? Shocking.
You're an imbecile and your initial point was proven wrong by at least one person... You then change your argument, without being able to cite any actual evidence. Laughable.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 1:55 pm GMTclyde46 wrote: thats awesome![QUOTE="clyde46"][/QUOTE] :lol: thats awesome!
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 1:57 pm GMT
[QUOTE="wis3boi"]
[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]
[QUOTE="Jankarcop"]
Whats halarious is, even as a bad port, it ran and looked better than the 360/ps3 versions...and is now the 100% superior version.
[/QUOTE]
Does it run properly on modest hardware?
Posts in the PC forum suggest otherwise.
http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/29345168/grand-theft-auto-iv-gta-4-lags
[/QUOTE]
*points out the fact his video card blows ass*
[/QUOTE]
So it needs high-end hardware just to run properly.
Do you consider that a superior version of the game?
I don't.
Video games should be accessable to the average joe, not just to the %1 who devote their lives.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 1:57 pm GMTNanomage wrote:Miketheman83 wrote:lundy86_4 wrote:
A couple of points you're going to need to prove, after you first define what "low-budget" and "high-budget" are, explicitly. Now, to the points:
- Prove all PC games have "low-budgets".
- Prove that they have nowhere near the budget of top console games.
Now, in your last sentence, you change your argument to "most", rather than "all".
----
I have to say, your argument is tremendously lackluster.
I don't needed budget figures to tell a game has lite production values, all I have to do is play it.
Look at a game like Witcher 2 compared to Skyrim. It's pretty obvious. I've played both games by the way.
Skyrim? Thatīs the worst possible comparison you couldīve made.
No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.[QUOTE="Nanomage"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]A couple of points you're going to need to prove, after you first define what "low-budget" and "high-budget" are, explicitly. Now, to the points:
- Prove all PC games have "low-budgets".
- Prove that they have nowhere near the budget of top console games.
Now, in your last sentence, you change your argument to "most", rather than "all".
----
I have to say, your argument is tremendously lackluster.
[/QUOTE] I don't needed budget figures to tell a game has lite production values, all I have to do is play it. Look at a game like Witcher 2 compared to Skyrim. It's pretty obvious. I've played both games by the way.[/QUOTE] Skyrim? Thatīs the worst possible comparison you couldīve made. :lol:[/QUOTE] No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 1:58 pm GMT
[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"][QUOTE="wis3boi"]
[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]
Does it run properly on modest hardware?
Posts in the PC forum suggest otherwise.
http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/29345168/grand-theft-auto-iv-gta-4-lags
[/QUOTE]
*points out the fact his video card blows ass*
[/QUOTE]
So it needs high-end hardware just to run properly.
Do you consider that a superior version of the game?
I don't.
Video games should be accessable to the average joe, not just to the %1 who devote their lives.
[/QUOTE] No, it does not. My old rig used to run it at a better visual set than the consoles at teh same frame rate.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 1:58 pm GMT
Why even make a thread?
There is no confirmation to make.
It's coming to PC just like all the GTA games and be much better.
Funnily enough if it's true Rockstar is only using footage showing PS3 then it seems the 360 will be on the short end of the stick this time
Why even make a thread?
There is no confirmation to make.
It's coming to PC just like all the GTA games and be much better.
Funnily enough if it's true Rockstar is only using footage showing PS3 then it seems the 360 will be on the short end of the stick this time :shock:
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 1:58 pm GMTMiketheman83 wrote:Nanomage wrote:Miketheman83 wrote:
I don't needed budget figures to tell a game has lite production values, all I have to do is play it.
Look at a game like Witcher 2 compared to Skyrim. It's pretty obvious. I've played both games by the way.
Skyrim? Thatīs the worst possible comparison you couldīve made.
No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.
He's actually serious![QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="Nanomage"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] I don't needed budget figures to tell a game has lite production values, all I have to do is play it. Look at a game like Witcher 2 compared to Skyrim. It's pretty obvious. I've played both games by the way.[/QUOTE] Skyrim? Thatīs the worst possible comparison you couldīve made. :lol:[/QUOTE] No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k139/radar19/Funnys/1359432860175.gif[/IMG] He's actually serious!- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 2:01 pm GMTMiketheman83 wrote:Nanomage wrote:Miketheman83 wrote:
I don't needed budget figures to tell a game has lite production values, all I have to do is play it.
Look at a game like Witcher 2 compared to Skyrim. It's pretty obvious. I've played both games by the way.
Skyrim? Thatīs the worst possible comparison you couldīve made.
No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.
Oh,so now weīre talking about gameplay design choices here? Nice way to back pedal the argument.
Not to mention that Skyrim is a multiplatform game(wich was actually a PC only franchise to begin with) so it doesnīt fit your console argument,and to make matters even worse for you,by far the best version of the game is the PC version,in pretty much every respect lol.[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="Nanomage"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] I don't needed budget figures to tell a game has lite production values, all I have to do is play it. Look at a game like Witcher 2 compared to Skyrim. It's pretty obvious. I've played both games by the way.[/QUOTE] Skyrim? Thatīs the worst possible comparison you couldīve made. :lol:[/QUOTE] No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.[/QUOTE] Oh,so now weīre talking about gameplay design choices here? Nice way to back pedal the argument. :lol: Not to mention that Skyrim is a multiplatform game(wich was actually a PC only franchise to begin with) so it doesnīt fit your console argument,and to make matters even worse for you,by far the best version of the game is the PC version,in pretty much every respect lol.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 2:01 pm GMT
Skyrim was made primarily for the 360.
If we depend on PC market for games, all we will have is low budget stuff, free to play and MMO's.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 2:02 pm GMTclyde46 wrote:Miketheman83 wrote:Nanomage wrote:
Skyrim? Thatīs the worst possible comparison you couldīve made.
No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.
He's actually serious!
Can you walk around pick pocketingeveryone you came across in Witcher 2? No. Can you enter all buildings in Witcher? No. Not too mention the menus and controls were designed by a twelve year old. The Witcher feels like a last gen game in comparison.[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="Nanomage"] Skyrim? Thatīs the worst possible comparison you couldīve made. :lol:[/QUOTE] No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k139/radar19/Funnys/1359432860175.gif[/IMG] He's actually serious![/QUOTE] Can you walk around pick pocketingeveryone you came across in Witcher 2? No. Can you enter all buildings in Witcher? No. Not too mention the menus and controls were designed by a twelve year old. The Witcher feels like a last gen game in comparison.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 2:02 pm GMT[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]
Skyrim was made primarily for the 360.
If we depend on PC market for games, all we will have is low budget stuff, free to play and MMO's.
[/QUOTE] Thats why its a really bad RPG.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 2:02 pm GMT[QUOTE="ZombieKiller7"]
Skyrim was made primarily for the 360.
If we depend on PC market for games, all we will have is low budget stuff, free to play and MMO's.
[/QUOTE] Then it sure is sad that one game is made "primarly" for one system and ends up being miles better on another,that makes it even more embarassing lol.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 2:03 pm GMTOMG this is hilarious!Miketheman83 wrote:Can you walk around pick pocketingeveryone you came across in Witcher 2? No. Can you enter all buildings in Witcher? No. Not too mention the menus and controls were designed by a twelve year old. The Witcher feels like a last gen game in comparison.clyde46 wrote:Miketheman83 wrote:No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison. He's actually serious!
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k139/radar19/Funnys/1359432860175.gif[/IMG] He's actually serious![/QUOTE] Can you walk around pick pocketingeveryone you came across in Witcher 2? No. Can you enter all buildings in Witcher? No. Not too mention the menus and controls were designed by a twelve year old. The Witcher feels like a last gen game in comparison.[/QUOTE] OMG this is hilarious! :lol:
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 2:04 pm GMTMiketheman83 wrote:clyde46 wrote:Miketheman83 wrote:
No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.
He's actually serious!
Can you walk around pick pocketingeveryone you came across in Witcher 2? No. Can you enter all buildings in Witcher? No. Not too mention the menus and controls were designed by a twelve year old. The Witcher feels like a last gen game in comparison.
If you ignore the fact that the Witcher is vastly superior to Skyrim. Skyrim is such a step back compared to Oblivion.[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k139/radar19/Funnys/1359432860175.gif[/IMG] He's actually serious![/QUOTE] Can you walk around pick pocketingeveryone you came across in Witcher 2? No. Can you enter all buildings in Witcher? No. Not too mention the menus and controls were designed by a twelve year old. The Witcher feels like a last gen game in comparison.[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k139/radar19/Funnys/7fLmXaZ.gif[/IMG] If you ignore the fact that the Witcher is vastly superior to Skyrim. Skyrim is such a step back compared to Oblivion.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 2:05 pm GMTNanomage wrote:Miketheman83 wrote:Nanomage wrote:
Skyrim? Thatīs the worst possible comparison you couldīve made.
No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.
Oh,so now weīre talking about gameplay design choices here? Nice way to back pedal the argument.
Not to mention that Skyrim is a multiplatform game(wich was actually a PC only franchise to begin with) so it doesnīt fit your console argument,and to make matters even worse for you,by far the best version of the game is the PC version,in pretty much every respect lol.
Actually it proves my argument. Look at the elder scrolls games that were developed for the PC compared to Skyrim. Skyrim obviously has a waaay bigger budget. If you can't see that you are jaded.[QUOTE="Nanomage"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="Nanomage"] Skyrim? Thatīs the worst possible comparison you couldīve made. :lol:[/QUOTE] No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.[/QUOTE] Oh,so now weīre talking about gameplay design choices here? Nice way to back pedal the argument. :lol: Not to mention that Skyrim is a multiplatform game(wich was actually a PC only franchise to begin with) so it doesnīt fit your console argument,and to make matters even worse for you,by far the best version of the game is the PC version,in pretty much every respect lol.[/QUOTE] Actually it proves my argument. Look at the elder scrolls games that were developed for the PC compared to Skyrim. Skyrim obviously has a waaay bigger budget. If you can't see that you are jaded.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 2:05 pm GMTMiketheman83 wrote:Can you walk around pick pocketingeveryone you came across in Witcher 2? No. Can you enter all buildings in Witcher? No. Not too mention the menus and controls were designed by a twelve year old. The Witcher feels like a last gen game in comparison.clyde46 wrote:Miketheman83 wrote:No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison. He's actually serious!
Ah yes, the typical ignorant Skyrim fanboy. I missed you guys.
Owner of a Wii/360/PS3
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k139/radar19/Funnys/1359432860175.gif[/IMG] He's actually serious![/QUOTE] Can you walk around pick pocketingeveryone you came across in Witcher 2? No. Can you enter all buildings in Witcher? No. Not too mention the menus and controls were designed by a twelve year old. The Witcher feels like a last gen game in comparison.[/QUOTE]
Ah yes, the typical ignorant Skyrim fanboy. I missed you guys.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 2:06 pm GMTMiketheman83 wrote:Nanomage wrote:Miketheman83 wrote:
No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.
Oh,so now weīre talking about gameplay design choices here? Nice way to back pedal the argument.
Not to mention that Skyrim is a multiplatform game(wich was actually a PC only franchise to begin with) so it doesnīt fit your console argument,and to make matters even worse for you,by far the best version of the game is the PC version,in pretty much every respect lol.
Actually it proves my argument. Look at the elder scrolls games that were developed for the PC compared to Skyrim. Skyrim obviously has a waaay bigger budget. If you can't see that you are jaded.
Massive budget and still is one of the buggiest games this gen.[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="Nanomage"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] No actually it's not. Skyrim has more depth in the first ten minutes then all of Witcher 2 combined. Constant QTE's really? Not a true open world game. Less magic, items, weapons etc. The cut scenes were laughable. Witcher 2 felt like a budget title in comparison.[/QUOTE] Oh,so now weīre talking about gameplay design choices here? Nice way to back pedal the argument. :lol: Not to mention that Skyrim is a multiplatform game(wich was actually a PC only franchise to begin with) so it doesnīt fit your console argument,and to make matters even worse for you,by far the best version of the game is the PC version,in pretty much every respect lol.[/QUOTE] Actually it proves my argument. Look at the elder scrolls games that were developed for the PC compared to Skyrim. Skyrim obviously has a waaay bigger budget. If you can't see that you are jaded.[/QUOTE] Massive budget and still is one of the buggiest games this gen.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Jan 29, 2013 2:07 pm GMT
Miketheman digging a bigger hole? Shocker
Miketheman digging a bigger hole? Shocker :lol:
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
