Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsOff-Topic Discussion › Obama signs bill giving himself armed pr ...

The Classic Off-Topic forum is a place where games or platforms discussions are taboo. Here, you can talk about just about anything outside of games, just make sure to stay classy and follow the rules.

Forum Rules:
- Follow the Terms of Use and read the FAQ.
- Keep your discussions friendly and respectful of others.
- Keep the discussions work friendly. More details in the FAQ (For something more laid back go to Off Topic: After Hours
- Game and platform discussions NOT allowed (For that go to the Primary Games Board or System Wars.
- Do NOT post or bump extremely abusive discussions.
- Hate speech not permitted.

Obama signs bill giving himself armed protection for life

Forum Actions
  • Level 31
    Ippon!
    Posts: 4719
    User is Online
    Jan 11, 2013 7:22 pm GMT

    :

    President Barack Obama gave himself and his wife Michelle the benefit of armed protection for the rest of their lives by signing a bill granting a Secret Service detail to former presidents and their spouses in perpetuity.

    The new law, which will cost U.S. millions of dollars, is a re-instatement of a 1965 law which will see presidents protected for life as well as their children up to age 16. The billpassed the House and Senate in December.

    Obama, whose Secret Service codename is Renegade, joked in 2011 that he liked the fact that 'men with guns' protected his daughters, Malia, now 14, and Sasha, now 11.

    'I should also point out that I have men with guns that surround them, often,' he told ABC News. 'And a great incentive for running for re-election is that it means they never get in the car with a boy who had a beer, and that's a pretty good thing.

    The new law statesthat all former U.S. presidents who served after January 1st 1997, along with their spouses, receive protection from the Secret Service for their entire lifetimes.The law also stipulates that children of presidents receive protection until the age of 16.

    Lifetime government-provided security for former presidents was the law of the land until 1997, when Congress passed legislation limiting Secret Service protection to ten years after leaving office.

    Now, every former president Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush along with Obama will continue to receive Secret Service details for the rest of their lives.

    The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives in November 2012 by South Carolina Republican Representative. Trey Gowdy.Co-sponsors included Republican Lamar Smith, and Democrats John Conyers and Bobby Scott.

    'Both men [Bush and Obama] are young, enjoy good health, and have long lives ahead of them post-presidency,' Gowdy said on the House floor. 'This bill proposes to extend that security for the remainder of their lives.

    The Secret Service started protecting presidents in 1901 after the assassination of William McKinley. In 1965, Congress passed a law authorising the agency, which is now a part of the Department of Homeland Security, to protect former presidents for life.

    The legislation was signed along with a host of other bills, including the naming of seven post offices.

    Some conservatives have attacked Obama for allegedly wanting to deprive ordinary Americans the right to arm themselves while at the same time ensuring that his family will always be protected by 'men with guns' at taxpayers' expense.

    source

    Obama thinks it's okay to spend millions of stolen tax dollars on armed security for himself, yet he opposes American citizens using their own money to keep guns to protect themselves. His hypocrisy it outrageous. Why does Obama believe that he and his family are entitled to safety, but not the rest of us? Why does Obama believe that he is the exception to his own laws?

    ~~~~~~~

    Author of The Obama Paradox - coming to major ebook stores June 2013.

    ~~~~~~~

    Moderator at Dave's Place, which is a better forum than TDH.

    ~~~~~~~

    Founder and President of the Official OT Film Club.

    [quote]

    President Barack Obama gave himself and his wife Michelle the benefit of armed protection for the rest of their lives by signing a bill granting a Secret Service detail to former presidents and their spouses in perpetuity.

    The new law, which will cost U.S. millions of dollars, is a re-instatement of a 1965 law which will see presidents protected for life as well as their children up to age 16. The billpassed the House and Senate in December.

    Obama, whose Secret Service codename is Renegade, joked in 2011 that he liked the fact that 'men with guns' protected his daughters, Malia, now 14, and Sasha, now 11.

    'I should also point out that I have men with guns that surround them, often,' he told ABC News. 'And a great incentive for running for re-election is that it means they never get in the car with a boy who had a beer, and that's a pretty good thing.

    The new law statesthat all former U.S. presidents who served after January 1st 1997, along with their spouses, receive protection from the Secret Service for their entire lifetimes.The law also stipulates that children of presidents receive protection until the age of 16.

    Lifetime government-provided security for former presidents was the law of the land until 1997, when Congress passed legislation limiting Secret Service protection to ten years after leaving office.

    Now, every former president Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush along with Obama will continue to receive Secret Service details for the rest of their lives.

    The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives in November 2012 by South Carolina Republican Representative. Trey Gowdy.Co-sponsors included Republican Lamar Smith, and Democrats John Conyers and Bobby Scott.

    'Both men [Bush and Obama] are young, enjoy good health, and have long lives ahead of them post-presidency,' Gowdy said on the House floor. 'This bill proposes to extend that security for the remainder of their lives.

    The Secret Service started protecting presidents in 1901 after the assassination of William McKinley. In 1965, Congress passed a law authorising the agency, which is now a part of the Department of Homeland Security, to protect former presidents for life.

    The legislation was signed along with a host of other bills, including the naming of seven post offices.

    Some conservatives have attacked Obama for allegedly wanting to deprive ordinary Americans the right to arm themselves while at the same time ensuring that his family will always be protected by 'men with guns' at taxpayers' expense.[/quote]

    source

    Obama thinks it's okay to spend millions of stolen tax dollars on armed security for himself, yet he opposes American citizens using their own money to keep guns to protect themselves. His hypocrisy it outrageous. Why does Obama believe that he and his family are entitled to safety, but not the rest of us? Why does Obama believe that he is the exception to his own laws?

  • Level 46
    Mutoid Man
    Posts: 22631
    User is Online
    Jan 11, 2013 7:25 pm GMT

    Don't all ex-presidents have stuff like this?

    Don't all ex-presidents have stuff like this?

  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 21309
    User is Online
    Jan 11, 2013 7:26 pm GMT

    Obama has not proposed to ban people from purchasing firearms.

    /thread.

    Now Playing: Shin Megami Tensei: Persona 4, Secret of Mana

    My 100 favorite songs of All Time. And because I ran out of blog post space, here's the second part of the list.

    Recent Reviews: Mother 3, Final Fantasy VII, Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars.

    Obama has not proposed to ban people from purchasing firearms.

    /thread.

  • Level 34
    Paramecium
    Posts: 8068
    User is Online
    Jan 11, 2013 7:27 pm GMT

    to be fair he is more a target than most people will ever be in 1000 years of living.

    to be fair he is more a target than most people will ever be in 1000 years of living.

  • Level 40
    Abobo
    Posts: 5809
    Jan 11, 2013 7:29 pm GMT

    Laihendi wrote:

    :

    President Barack Obama gave himself and his wife Michelle the benefit of armed protection for the rest of their lives by signing a bill granting a Secret Service detail to former presidents and their spouses in perpetuity.

    The new law, which will cost U.S. millions of dollars, is a re-instatement of a 1965 law which will see presidents protected for life as well as their children up to age 16. The billpassed the House and Senate in December.

    Obama, whose Secret Service codename is Renegade, joked in 2011 that he liked the fact that 'men with guns' protected his daughters, Malia, now 14, and Sasha, now 11.

    'I should also point out that I have men with guns that surround them, often,' he told ABC News. 'And a great incentive for running for re-election is that it means they never get in the car with a boy who had a beer, and that's a pretty good thing.

    The new law statesthat all former U.S. presidents who served after January 1st 1997, along with their spouses, receive protection from the Secret Service for their entire lifetimes.The law also stipulates that children of presidents receive protection until the age of 16.

    Lifetime government-provided security for former presidents was the law of the land until 1997, when Congress passed legislation limiting Secret Service protection to ten years after leaving office.

    Now, every former president Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush along with Obama will continue to receive Secret Service details for the rest of their lives.

    The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives in November 2012 by South Carolina Republican Representative. Trey Gowdy.Co-sponsors included Republican Lamar Smith, and Democrats John Conyers and Bobby Scott.

    'Both men [Bush and Obama] are young, enjoy good health, and have long lives ahead of them post-presidency,' Gowdy said on the House floor. 'This bill proposes to extend that security for the remainder of their lives.

    The Secret Service started protecting presidents in 1901 after the assassination of William McKinley. In 1965, Congress passed a law authorising the agency, which is now a part of the Department of Homeland Security, to protect former presidents for life.

    The legislation was signed along with a host of other bills, including the naming of seven post offices.

    Some conservatives have attacked Obama for allegedly wanting to deprive ordinary Americans the right to arm themselves while at the same time ensuring that his family will always be protected by 'men with guns' at taxpayers' expense.

    source

    Obama thinks it's okay to spend millions of stolen tax dollars on armed security for himself, yet he opposes American citizens using their own money to keep guns to protect themselves. His hypocrisy it outrageous. Why does Obama believe that he and his family are entitled to safety, but not the rest of us? Why does Obama believe that he is the exception to his own laws?

    Your head could not be any further up your own ass.

    [QUOTE="Laihendi"]

    [quote]

    President Barack Obama gave himself and his wife Michelle the benefit of armed protection for the rest of their lives by signing a bill granting a Secret Service detail to former presidents and their spouses in perpetuity.

    The new law, which will cost U.S. millions of dollars, is a re-instatement of a 1965 law which will see presidents protected for life as well as their children up to age 16. The billpassed the House and Senate in December.

    Obama, whose Secret Service codename is Renegade, joked in 2011 that he liked the fact that 'men with guns' protected his daughters, Malia, now 14, and Sasha, now 11.

    'I should also point out that I have men with guns that surround them, often,' he told ABC News. 'And a great incentive for running for re-election is that it means they never get in the car with a boy who had a beer, and that's a pretty good thing.

    The new law statesthat all former U.S. presidents who served after January 1st 1997, along with their spouses, receive protection from the Secret Service for their entire lifetimes.The law also stipulates that children of presidents receive protection until the age of 16.

    Lifetime government-provided security for former presidents was the law of the land until 1997, when Congress passed legislation limiting Secret Service protection to ten years after leaving office.

    Now, every former president Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush along with Obama will continue to receive Secret Service details for the rest of their lives.

    The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives in November 2012 by South Carolina Republican Representative. Trey Gowdy.Co-sponsors included Republican Lamar Smith, and Democrats John Conyers and Bobby Scott.

    'Both men [Bush and Obama] are young, enjoy good health, and have long lives ahead of them post-presidency,' Gowdy said on the House floor. 'This bill proposes to extend that security for the remainder of their lives.

    The Secret Service started protecting presidents in 1901 after the assassination of William McKinley. In 1965, Congress passed a law authorising the agency, which is now a part of the Department of Homeland Security, to protect former presidents for life.

    The legislation was signed along with a host of other bills, including the naming of seven post offices.

    Some conservatives have attacked Obama for allegedly wanting to deprive ordinary Americans the right to arm themselves while at the same time ensuring that his family will always be protected by 'men with guns' at taxpayers' expense.[/quote]

    source

    Obama thinks it's okay to spend millions of stolen tax dollars on armed security for himself, yet he opposes American citizens using their own money to keep guns to protect themselves. His hypocrisy it outrageous. Why does Obama believe that he and his family are entitled to safety, but not the rest of us? Why does Obama believe that he is the exception to his own laws?

    [/QUOTE]

    Your head could not be any further up your own ass.

  • Level 47
    Jaquio
    Posts: 20585
    Jan 11, 2013 7:29 pm GMT
    - Reinstatement of a 1965 law
    - Bill proposed by Republican legislator - Was voted in by the House and Senate
    - Covers all former Presidents, not just Obama

    Try again Lahendi

    :
    It is my opinion that pursuing women who do not have red hair isn’t a good time investment. Eventually you will look at her hair, realize it’s not red, and come to understand that you’ve settled for less. - Jerry "Tycho" Holkins

    - Reinstatement of a 1965 law - Bill proposed by Republican legislator - Was voted in by the House and Senate - Covers all former Presidents, not just Obama Try again Lahendi
  • Level 42
    Karnov
    Posts: 13579
    User is Online
    Jan 11, 2013 7:31 pm GMT

    This is pretty outrageous. His vacations cost the country millions of dollars due to the special arrangements needed for them, and now he does this. What does he think he has to fear that other presidents haven't? Currently a president only has to receive one "credible" threat a year to keep secret service protection beyond their 10-year allotment. That typically keeps presidents protected anyways, but he wants to make sure. Strange that he should do this.

    i5-3570k@4.5ghz/CM Hyper 212+/Gigabyte Z77-D3H/8GB Corsair DDR3/Gigabyte GTX 560 Ti SOC 1GB/128GB Samsung 830 Series SSD/1 TB WD Caviar Black HDD/Creative X-FI Xtremegamer/DVD Burner+Blu-ray/CM 692 case/Acer H233H 23" 1080p/Panasonic TCP50-VT25 50" 3d Plasma TV/Klipsch Promedia 2.1/Antec Earthwatts 650 watt PSU/Vista X64

    This is pretty outrageous. His vacations cost the country millions of dollars due to the special arrangements needed for them, and now he does this. What does he think he has to fear that other presidents haven't? Currently a president only has to receive one "credible" threat a year to keep secret service protection beyond their 10-year allotment. That typically keeps presidents protected anyways, but he wants to make sure. Strange that he should do this.

  • Level 38
    DJ Boy
    Posts: 35542
    User is Online
    Jan 11, 2013 7:32 pm GMT
    Been around for a while bro.
    Been around for a while bro.
  • Level 42
    Karnov
    Posts: 14949
    Jan 11, 2013 7:32 pm GMT

    worlock77 wrote:
    - Reinstatement of a 1965 law - Bill proposed by Republican legislator - Was voted in by the House and Senate - Covers all former Presidents, not just Obama Try again Lahendi

    And just like that, the thread is dead.

    [QUOTE="worlock77"]- Reinstatement of a 1965 law - Bill proposed by Republican legislator - Was voted in by the House and Senate - Covers all former Presidents, not just Obama Try again Lahendi[/QUOTE]

    And just like that, the thread is dead.

  • Level 45
    Mishima Zaibatsu
    Posts: 5935
    User is Online
    Jan 11, 2013 7:33 pm GMT

    Lol "millions" of dollars

    whipassmt wrote:
    MattUD1 wrote:
    Communism is the end result of society where after a dicatorship of the working class the working class will work to acheive the common good and create a class-less and propertyless society.
    yes but communism is a form of atheism.

    Lol "millions" of dollars

  • Level 42
    Karnov
    Posts: 13579
    User is Online
    Jan 11, 2013 7:34 pm GMT

    i5-3570k@4.5ghz/CM Hyper 212+/Gigabyte Z77-D3H/8GB Corsair DDR3/Gigabyte GTX 560 Ti SOC 1GB/128GB Samsung 830 Series SSD/1 TB WD Caviar Black HDD/Creative X-FI Xtremegamer/DVD Burner+Blu-ray/CM 692 case/Acer H233H 23" 1080p/Panasonic TCP50-VT25 50" 3d Plasma TV/Klipsch Promedia 2.1/Antec Earthwatts 650 watt PSU/Vista X64

  • Level 21
    Rescue Ranger
    Posts: 3228
    Jan 11, 2013 7:39 pm GMT

    OP is upset because he cant even afford to tip when he eats out.

    It will all get better when you finish middle school OP.

    Jandurin wrote:
    It felt generic.

    OP is upset because he cant even afford to tip when he eats out.

    It will all get better when you finish middle school OP.

  • Level 64
    Easter Egg
    Posts: 65040
    Jan 11, 2013 7:40 pm GMT
    Not a bad thing.
    Not a bad thing.
  • Level 42
    Karnov
    Posts: 13579
    User is Online
    Jan 11, 2013 7:40 pm GMT

    Cloud_Insurance wrote:

    OP is upset because he cant even afford to tip when he eats out.

    It will all get better when you finish middle school OP.

    I'm sure OP is in better shape financially than the US government. The difference is that he can't just print or borrow more money all the time.

    i5-3570k@4.5ghz/CM Hyper 212+/Gigabyte Z77-D3H/8GB Corsair DDR3/Gigabyte GTX 560 Ti SOC 1GB/128GB Samsung 830 Series SSD/1 TB WD Caviar Black HDD/Creative X-FI Xtremegamer/DVD Burner+Blu-ray/CM 692 case/Acer H233H 23" 1080p/Panasonic TCP50-VT25 50" 3d Plasma TV/Klipsch Promedia 2.1/Antec Earthwatts 650 watt PSU/Vista X64

    [QUOTE="Cloud_Insurance"]

    OP is upset because he cant even afford to tip when he eats out.

    It will all get better when you finish middle school OP.

    [/QUOTE]

    I'm sure OP is in better shape financially than the US government. The difference is that he can't just print or borrow more money all the time.

  • Level 68
    Song of Nephilim
    Posts: 5153
    User is Online
    Jan 11, 2013 7:41 pm GMT

    hartsickdiscipl wrote:

    This is pretty outrageous. His vacations cost the country millions of dollars due to the special arrangements needed for them, and now he does this. What does he think he has to fear that other presidents haven't? Currently a president only has to receive one "credible" threat a year to keep secret service protection beyond their 10-year allotment. That typically keeps presidents protected anyways, but he wants to make sure. Strange that he should do this.

    President Obama didn't make this bill. It was introducedby a Republican in the house, and passed thu vote to the Senate and then to his desk. I may disagree with Obama on alot of things; however this makes sense (and it isn't just Obama)

    My 360 Gamertag pgw chaos
    My PSN Tag: pgw_chaos

    [QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

    This is pretty outrageous. His vacations cost the country millions of dollars due to the special arrangements needed for them, and now he does this. What does he think he has to fear that other presidents haven't? Currently a president only has to receive one "credible" threat a year to keep secret service protection beyond their 10-year allotment. That typically keeps presidents protected anyways, but he wants to make sure. Strange that he should do this.

    [/QUOTE]

    President Obama didn't make this bill. It was introducedby a Republican in the house, and passed thu vote to the Senate and then to his desk. I may disagree with Obama on alot of things; however this makes sense (and it isn't just Obama)

  • Level 47
    Jaquio
    Posts: 20585
    Jan 11, 2013 7:42 pm GMT
    hartsickdiscipl wrote:

    This is pretty outrageous. His vacations cost the country millions of dollars due to the special arrangements needed for them, and now he does this. What does he think he has to fear that other presidents haven't? Currently a president only has to receive one "credible" threat a year to keep secret service protection beyond their 10-year allotment. That typically keeps presidents protected anyways, but he wants to make sure. Strange that he should do this.



    Did you even read the article?

    :
    It is my opinion that pursuing women who do not have red hair isn’t a good time investment. Eventually you will look at her hair, realize it’s not red, and come to understand that you’ve settled for less. - Jerry "Tycho" Holkins

    [QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

    This is pretty outrageous. His vacations cost the country millions of dollars due to the special arrangements needed for them, and now he does this. What does he think he has to fear that other presidents haven't? Currently a president only has to receive one "credible" threat a year to keep secret service protection beyond their 10-year allotment. That typically keeps presidents protected anyways, but he wants to make sure. Strange that he should do this.

    [/QUOTE] Did you even read the article?
  • Level 58
    Death=Adder
    Posts: 29184
    Jan 11, 2013 7:42 pm GMT
    Lai, you got anymore talliers for otcars?
    -MOST ACTIVE POSTER 2012-

    no-scope-AK47 wrote:

    Talking with you gays makes one thing clear your on some F the world type stuff. If this does not work out then what is next guns ??

    Will you become terrorist blowing up kids and old people as long as you get your way. Where is the end in your single minded pursuit of rights for gays. Where does the slippery slope end. I know F me your a freedom fighter and your cause is just. It is us against the world who is holding us back huh. Clearly logic has no place here so I am done.

    Lai, you got anymore talliers for otcars?
  • Level 42
    Karnov
    Posts: 13579
    User is Online
    Jan 11, 2013 7:44 pm GMT

    Chaos_HL21 wrote:

    hartsickdiscipl wrote:

    This is pretty outrageous. His vacations cost the country millions of dollars due to the special arrangements needed for them, and now he does this. What does he think he has to fear that other presidents haven't? Currently a president only has to receive one "credible" threat a year to keep secret service protection beyond their 10-year allotment. That typically keeps presidents protected anyways, but he wants to make sure. Strange that he should do this.

    President Obama didn't make this bill. It was introducedby a Republican in the house, and passed thu vote to the Senate and then to his desk. I may disagree with Obama on alot of things; however this makes sense (and it isn't just Obama)

    He could have vetoed it. The current policy is protective enough. 10 years of protection after being out of office, with continued protection if a threat is received at least once a year.

    i5-3570k@4.5ghz/CM Hyper 212+/Gigabyte Z77-D3H/8GB Corsair DDR3/Gigabyte GTX 560 Ti SOC 1GB/128GB Samsung 830 Series SSD/1 TB WD Caviar Black HDD/Creative X-FI Xtremegamer/DVD Burner+Blu-ray/CM 692 case/Acer H233H 23" 1080p/Panasonic TCP50-VT25 50" 3d Plasma TV/Klipsch Promedia 2.1/Antec Earthwatts 650 watt PSU/Vista X64

    [QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

    [QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

    This is pretty outrageous. His vacations cost the country millions of dollars due to the special arrangements needed for them, and now he does this. What does he think he has to fear that other presidents haven't? Currently a president only has to receive one "credible" threat a year to keep secret service protection beyond their 10-year allotment. That typically keeps presidents protected anyways, but he wants to make sure. Strange that he should do this.

    [/QUOTE]

    President Obama didn't make this bill. It was introducedby a Republican in the house, and passed thu vote to the Senate and then to his desk. I may disagree with Obama on alot of things; however this makes sense (and it isn't just Obama)

    [/QUOTE]

    He could have vetoed it. The current policy is protective enough. 10 years of protection after being out of office, with continued protection if a threat is received at least once a year.

  • Level 42
    Karnov
    Posts: 13579
    User is Online
    Jan 11, 2013 7:44 pm GMT

    worlock77 wrote:
    hartsickdiscipl wrote:

    This is pretty outrageous. His vacations cost the country millions of dollars due to the special arrangements needed for them, and now he does this. What does he think he has to fear that other presidents haven't? Currently a president only has to receive one "credible" threat a year to keep secret service protection beyond their 10-year allotment. That typically keeps presidents protected anyways, but he wants to make sure. Strange that he should do this.

    Did you even read the article?

    The fact that he signed it tells me enough.

    i5-3570k@4.5ghz/CM Hyper 212+/Gigabyte Z77-D3H/8GB Corsair DDR3/Gigabyte GTX 560 Ti SOC 1GB/128GB Samsung 830 Series SSD/1 TB WD Caviar Black HDD/Creative X-FI Xtremegamer/DVD Burner+Blu-ray/CM 692 case/Acer H233H 23" 1080p/Panasonic TCP50-VT25 50" 3d Plasma TV/Klipsch Promedia 2.1/Antec Earthwatts 650 watt PSU/Vista X64

    [QUOTE="worlock77"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

    This is pretty outrageous. His vacations cost the country millions of dollars due to the special arrangements needed for them, and now he does this. What does he think he has to fear that other presidents haven't? Currently a president only has to receive one "credible" threat a year to keep secret service protection beyond their 10-year allotment. That typically keeps presidents protected anyways, but he wants to make sure. Strange that he should do this.

    [/QUOTE] Did you even read the article?[/QUOTE]

    The fact that he signed it tells me enough.

  • Level 45
    Mishima Zaibatsu
    Posts: 5935
    User is Online
    Jan 11, 2013 7:46 pm GMT

    hartsickdiscipl wrote:

    I wasn't asking for confirmation, dude. I'm well aware that it might cost that much to fund a vacation with top tier security. It doesn't fvcking matter because a few million USD is literally less than a hundredth of a % of the Federal Budget, and anyone who spends time making a massive fuss about that kind of "wasteful spending" probably doesn't understand the sheer size of most national budgets around the world, and especially not that of the U.S.. Btw, Bush spent more time and money than Obama on vacations and I think anyone complaining about his taking "off-time" is probably making a huge sh!t over nothing tpo. I'd happily sacrifice millions of dollars if it meant helping an incredily stressed national leader to get some relaxation time without having to worry about being blown to pieces by some mad ideologue.

    Edited on Jan 11, 2013 7:46 pm GMT
    whipassmt wrote:
    MattUD1 wrote:
    Communism is the end result of society where after a dicatorship of the working class the working class will work to acheive the common good and create a class-less and propertyless society.
    yes but communism is a form of atheism.

    [QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

    [QUOTE="Barbariser"]

    Lol "millions" of dollars

    [/QUOTE]

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/20/obama-hawaii-vacation-cos_n_1158825.html

    [/QUOTE]

    I wasn't asking for confirmation, dude. I'm well aware that it might cost that much to fund a vacation with top tier security. It doesn't fvcking matter because a few million USD is literally less than a hundredth of a % of the Federal Budget, and anyone who spends time making a massive fuss about that kind of "wasteful spending" probably doesn't understand the sheer size of most national budgets around the world, and especially not that of the U.S.. Btw, Bush spent more time and money than Obama on vacations and I think anyone complaining about his taking "off-time" is probably making a huge sh!t over nothing tpo. I'd happily sacrifice millions of dollars if it meant helping an incredily stressed national leader to get some relaxation time without having to worry about being blown to pieces by some mad ideologue.

Forum Actions
ForumsOff-Topic Discussion › Obama signs bill giving himself armed pr ...