The Classic Off-Topic forum is a place where games or platforms discussions are taboo. Here, you can talk about just about anything outside of games, just make sure to stay classy and follow the rules.
Forum Rules:
- Follow the Terms of Use and read the FAQ.
- Keep your discussions friendly and respectful of others.
- Keep the discussions work friendly. More details in the FAQ (For something more laid back go to Off Topic: After Hours
- Game and platform discussions NOT allowed (For that go to the Primary Games Board or System Wars.
- Do NOT post or bump extremely abusive discussions.
- Hate speech not permitted.
The Hobbit Currently Sits At A Rating Of Just 62...
- Dec 4, 2012 4:45 pm GMT
i feel youre perfect, to me

whatever your flaws, i cannot seeWhat's that gotta do wif me? ;p- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 4:53 pm GMT
I'm sure the movie will be fine but will disappoint those that go in expecting another Lord of the Rings.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 4:55 pm GMT[QUOTE="MacBoomStick"]
The Dark Knight Rises effect. Just as good as the previous movie, if not better but reviews are lower because of the hype. I think expecting something better than LoTR is stupid. It also seems like some reviewer are rating it low just because of 48 fps.
[/QUOTE] Lets wait and see the film before deciding rather or not the reviews are fair.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 5:00 pm GMT
5 reviews?
Seems a bit early for Mount Doom and gloom
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 5:05 pm GMT
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]
Jackson is a hack that hasn't made a good film in over a decade so it's not surprising his new one would be mediocre.
[/QUOTE]
Posts like this remind me to not get my hopes up. :(
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 5:06 pm GMT
[QUOTE="dave123321"][QUOTE="MacBoomStick"]The Dark Knight Rises effect. Just as good as the previous movie, if not better but reviews are lower because of the hype. I think expecting something better than LoTR is stupid. It also seems like some reviewer are rating it low just because of 48 fps.
[/QUOTE] Lets wait and see the film before deciding rather or not the reviews are fair.[/QUOTE] Edit your post. Just to be safe.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 5:15 pm GMT


Times like this I am happy I havent read the books I have nothing to guage the film by,
I absolutely loved LOTR trilogy, and so I cant wait for the Hobbit.
cant believe its been nearly 10 years :(
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 5:33 pm GMT
[QUOTE="themajormayor"]Well LOTR trilogy sucked so I won't take the reviews too seriously[/QUOTE] Blasphemy!- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 5:40 pm GMT
Didn't Jackson also put together District 9? I know someone else directed it, but Jackson had something to do with that movie I believe.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 5:56 pm GMT
[QUOTE="Netherscourge"]Didn't Jackson also put together District 13? I know someone else directed it, but Jackson had something to do with that movie I believe.[/QUOTE]
District 9 and yes he was a producer for the movie.
The director was Neil Blomkamp.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 6:07 pm GMT

Do not invite me to your union. Doing so will get you ignored.
If the LOTR trilogy got a film for each book, then there is NO REASON for the Hobbit to be split into three movies, considering The Hobbit is the shortest book of them all. For that reason alone, I have no strong desire to see them. They'll be incredibly boring.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 6:09 pm GMT[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="dave123321"][QUOTE="MacBoomStick"]
The Dark Knight Rises effect. Just as good as the previous movie, if not better but reviews are lower because of the hype. I think expecting something better than LoTR is stupid. It also seems like some reviewer are rating it low just because of 48 fps.
[/QUOTE] Lets wait and see the film before deciding rather or not the reviews are fair.[/QUOTE] Edit your post. Just to be safe.[/QUOTE] ?- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 6:24 pm GMT
[QUOTE="Goyoshi12"]
[QUOTE="Netherscourge"]Didn't Jackson also put together District 13? I know someone else directed it, but Jackson had something to do with that movie I believe.[/QUOTE]
District 9 and yes he was a producer for the movie.
The director was Neil Blomkamp.
[/QUOTE]
Oh yea LOL
Where'd I get District 13 from? Maybe Hunger Games? lol
Anyway, that was an AWESOME movie.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 6:25 pm GMT
The Hobbit has a slow beginning. Naturally this is reflected in film 1.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 6:34 pm GMT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmmm. Hobbit is a small book, so I wonder why Jackson wanted to split the book into 3 movies.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 6:50 pm GMT
[QUOTE="Netherscourge"]
[QUOTE="Goyoshi12"]
[QUOTE="Netherscourge"]Didn't Jackson also put together District 13? I know someone else directed it, but Jackson had something to do with that movie I believe.[/QUOTE]
District 9 and yes he was a producer for the movie.
The director was Neil Blomkamp.
[/QUOTE]
Oh yea LOL
Where'd I get District 13 from? Maybe Hunger Games? lol
Anyway, that was an AWESOME movie.
[/QUOTE] District 9 or The Hunger Games?
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
Pass. Avengers is still the best of 2012!
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 7:48 pm GMT
~~~~~~~
Author of The Obama Paradox - coming to major ebook stores June 2013.
~~~~~~~
Moderator at Dave's Place, which is a better forum than TDH.
~~~~~~~
Founder and President of the Official OT Film Club.
[QUOTE="Justinps2hero"]Looks so similar to the LOTRs films, carbon copy trilogy. I'll end up seeing it, but not going to the cinema, sorry Pete, hope you enjoy making them brov.[/QUOTE] I get the impression that you have never read The Hobbit before.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 7:50 pm GMTi'm not sure why they split it up into three movies. two would have been fine if they couldn't do it in one. there's not enough solid content in the novel to float three feature-lengths.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Dec 4, 2012 7:59 pm GMT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I kind of expected it wouldn't be as great as Fellowship, Two Towers, and Return of the King. It's very difficult to live up to the level of greatness that trilogy brought to the cinema.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.





