Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsSony PlayStation 3 › AC3 Was a dissapointment who else agrees

This forum is considered a sanctuary for Playstation 3 owners. Anti-PS3 discussions will be considered a forum invasion.

- Follow the Terms of Use.
- Cross-platform discussions belong in System Wars.
- Illegal activities not allowed.

AC3 Was a dissapointment who else agrees

Forum Actions
  • Level 20
    Metal Slime
    Posts: 524
    Nov 26, 2012 10:56 pm GMT

    who else agrees

    who else agrees

  • Level 36
    Radical Ninja
    Posts: 177
    User is Online
    Nov 27, 2012 12:12 am GMT
    I agree.
    I agree.
  • Level 30
    Wicked Sick!
    Posts: 1019
    User is Online
    Nov 27, 2012 2:06 am GMT

    yea i agree but only because AC2 was so great. Kind of hard to outdo yourself in one of the best games of this gen.

    Sig Sig Sig

    BibiMaghoo wrote:
    It seems to me that hermits think a 1080p TV can only display an image in 1080p...... So of course all our monitors that can display different resolutions are upscaled to its maximum res by default? that is what is being said? crazy people lol .

    xXShortroundXx wrote:

    Japan > West, not an opinion, a mere fact.

    ZombieKiller7 wrote:
    PS3 to me feel way underpowered. Most multiplats especially look terrible, no AA, low resolution, weak framerates. You can tell the GPU is really struggling to put out a decent picture. Even games everybody raves about (KZ3, MGS4, UC, etc) look terrible other than the cutscenes. Like PC graphics from 15 years ago.

    yea i agree but only because AC2 was so great. Kind of hard to outdo yourself in one of the best games of this gen.

  • Level 30
    Wicked Sick!
    Posts: 410
    Nov 27, 2012 3:00 am GMT
    I was very impressed at first, but after you become adult Conner that's where the game slowly went downhill for me, though he did wear my favorite assassin outfit and I think the frontier was the best part of the game. They also made the city (I don't say 'cities' because the two felt pretty much the same) have a good feel to it on foot, it just got pretty dull after a while.

    I was very impressed at first, but after you become adult Conner that's where the game slowly went downhill for me, though he did wear my favorite assassin outfit and I think the frontier was the best part of the game. They also made the city (I don't say 'cities' because the two felt pretty much the same) have a good feel to it on foot, it just got pretty dull after a while.
  • Level 43
    Sword of Sodan
    Posts: 8789
    User is Online
    Nov 27, 2012 3:33 am GMT

    No, and who cares?

    No, and who cares?

  • Level 42
    Karnov
    Posts: 1972
    User is Online
    Nov 27, 2012 4:25 am GMT

    I agree. Probably my most anticipated title of this year and it was just disappointing. The combat is great, so are the naval battles, graphics, etc. But Connor is a very weak protagonist. He's not as charming nor interesting as Altair or Ezio, which is surprising considering his background:

    ***SPOILER***

    I really wish the game starred Haytham. Much more interesting, charming, enjoyable character. He has a certain style and confidence that I loved that Connor just lacks. Connor just comes off sounding like a whinny adolescent most of the time.

    The mission design is pretty disappointing too. I expected really epic battles judging by the trailers and the new engine sporting "thousands of NPCs on screen"but nope. You usually have scripted events or else you're desynchronized. Even the stealth seems lacking. It's even more linear than the previous games. You're pulled along on a string to play how the developers want you to without much room for experimenting how to complete a mission (thank God for Hitman: Absolution and Dishonored coming out this Fall; I almost forget what stealth games were like).

    Still, it has plenty of good factors. I'd say a 7/10. Very disappointing due to the hype but overall not bad. Still good-alright.

    I agree. Probably my most anticipated title of this year and it was just disappointing. The combat is great, so are the naval battles, graphics, etc. But Connor is a very weak protagonist. He's not as charming nor interesting as Altair or Ezio, which is surprising considering his background: [spoiler] Connor's father is a Templar colonist and his mother was Native American, plus he was raised as an assassin; how do you make THAT boring?! [/spoiler]

    I really wish the game starred Haytham. Much more interesting, charming, enjoyable character. He has a certain style and confidence that I loved that Connor just lacks. Connor just comes off sounding like a whinny adolescent most of the time.

    The mission design is pretty disappointing too. I expected really epic battles judging by the trailers and the new engine sporting "thousands of NPCs on screen"but nope. You usually have scripted events or else you're desynchronized. Even the stealth seems lacking. It's even more linear than the previous games. You're pulled along on a string to play how the developers want you to without much room for experimenting how to complete a mission (thank God for Hitman: Absolution and Dishonored coming out this Fall; I almost forget what stealth games were like).

    Still, it has plenty of good factors. I'd say a 7/10. Very disappointing due to the hype but overall not bad. Still good-alright.

  • Level 30
    Wicked Sick!
    Posts: 410
    Nov 27, 2012 5:15 am GMT

    DrRockso87 wrote:

    I agree. Probably my most anticipated title of this year and it was just disappointing. The combat is great, so are the naval battles, graphics, etc. But Connor is a very weak protagonist. He's not as charming nor interesting as Altair or Ezio, which is surprising considering his background:

    ***SPOILER***

    I really wish the game starred Haytham. Much more interesting, charming, enjoyable character. He has a certain style and confidence that I loved that Connor just lacks. Connor just comes off sounding like a whinny adolescent most of the time.

    The mission design is pretty disappointing too. I expected really epic battles judging by the trailers and the new engine sporting "thousands of NPCs on screen"but nope. You usually have scripted events or else you're desynchronized. Even the stealth seems lacking. It's even more linear than the previous games. You're pulled along on a string to play how the developers want you to without much room for experimenting how to complete a mission (thank God for Hitman: Absolution and Dishonored coming out this Fall; I almost forget what stealth games were like).

    Still, it has plenty of good factors. I'd say a 7/10. Very disappointing due to the hype but overall not bad. Still good-alright.

    Yup.

    [QUOTE="DrRockso87"]

    I agree. Probably my most anticipated title of this year and it was just disappointing. The combat is great, so are the naval battles, graphics, etc. But Connor is a very weak protagonist. He's not as charming nor interesting as Altair or Ezio, which is surprising considering his background: [spoiler] Connor's father is a Templar colonist and his mother was Native American, plus he was raised as an assassin; how do you make THAT boring?! [/spoiler]

    I really wish the game starred Haytham. Much more interesting, charming, enjoyable character. He has a certain style and confidence that I loved that Connor just lacks. Connor just comes off sounding like a whinny adolescent most of the time.

    The mission design is pretty disappointing too. I expected really epic battles judging by the trailers and the new engine sporting "thousands of NPCs on screen"but nope. You usually have scripted events or else you're desynchronized. Even the stealth seems lacking. It's even more linear than the previous games. You're pulled along on a string to play how the developers want you to without much room for experimenting how to complete a mission (thank God for Hitman: Absolution and Dishonored coming out this Fall; I almost forget what stealth games were like).

    Still, it has plenty of good factors. I'd say a 7/10. Very disappointing due to the hype but overall not bad. Still good-alright.

    [/QUOTE]

    Yup.

  • Level 39
    Max Force
    Posts: 6688
    Nov 27, 2012 7:18 am GMT

    cdragon_88 wrote:

    yea i agree but only because AC2 was so great. Kind of hard to outdo yourself in one of the best games of this gen.

    Opinion seconded. Nothing could touch AC2.

    Raptr Gamercard

    [QUOTE="cdragon_88"]

    yea i agree but only because AC2 was so great. Kind of hard to outdo yourself in one of the best games of this gen.

    [/QUOTE]

    Opinion seconded. Nothing could touch AC2.

  • Level 42
    Karnov
    Posts: 11963
    User is Online
    Nov 27, 2012 8:30 am GMT
    lild1425 wrote:

    cdragon_88 wrote:

    yea i agree but only because AC2 was so great. Kind of hard to outdo yourself in one of the best games of this gen.

    Opinion seconded. Nothing could touch AC2.


    Thirded!
    Proud non-owner of any and all Apple products.
    [QUOTE="lild1425"]

    [QUOTE="cdragon_88"]

    yea i agree but only because AC2 was so great. Kind of hard to outdo yourself in one of the best games of this gen.

    [/QUOTE]

    Opinion seconded. Nothing could touch AC2.

    [/QUOTE] Thirded!
  • Level 32
    Snake Eater
    Posts: 2626
    User is Online
    Nov 27, 2012 11:24 am GMT

    I thought the game was good or am i alone ?


    http://toziren.deviantart.com/

    I'm Nigerian, Proud African

    I thought the game was good or am i alone ?

  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 17199
    User is Online
    Nov 27, 2012 12:16 pm GMT

    I enjoyed AC3 a lot more than the other AC games, yeah the ending was iffy but last time I checked every AC game had a meh ending....specially AC1....oh god that ending...

    Steam-Panzerdeathknight,PSN-Ballroompirate,XBL-Namlessboss

    I enjoyed AC3 a lot more than the other AC games, yeah the ending was iffy but last time I checked every AC game had a meh ending....specially AC1....oh god that ending...

  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 12845
    User is Online
    Nov 27, 2012 2:31 pm GMT
    I liked it personally, probably my favorite AC game or tied with II.
    I liked it personally, probably my favorite AC game or tied with II.
  • Level 38
    DJ Boy
    Posts: 1436
    Nov 27, 2012 4:16 pm GMT

    the game was good, but nothing amazing...and my god the chase scenes were probably the worst things Ive ever played in a videogame

    the game was good, but nothing amazing...and my god the chase scenes were probably the worst things Ive ever played in a videogame

  • Level 20
    Metal Slime
    Posts: 4801
    User is Online
    Nov 27, 2012 5:26 pm GMT

    I wasn't all that impressed by it.

    The counter kills were really repetitive, and the A.I. would literally wait until you grabbed another enemy as a shield to fire at you. The map sucked. I don't understand why the guards didn't hunt you all the time. I mean Connor kinda stuck out in towns and what not. Sure you bribed people and took down the wanted posters, but I think that part of the game is seriously flawed. I don't know why Connor used a rapier sword as he would a cutlas or a normal sword. Or don't understand why the daggers had the same counter kills as the tomahawk. Fast travel made you ask why they made it like they did. I mean, lets have the game load when you select a destination, then make you walk 4 steps, then cut you back off to load some more, then you are at the fast travel destination.

    But that's not to say it's a horrible game. It's good but not great.

    I wasn't all that impressed by it.

    The counter kills were really repetitive, and the A.I. would literally wait until you grabbed another enemy as a shield to fire at you. The map sucked. I don't understand why the guards didn't hunt you all the time. I mean Connor kinda stuck out in towns and what not. Sure you bribed people and took down the wanted posters, but I think that part of the game is seriously flawed. I don't know why Connor used a rapier sword as he would a cutlas or a normal sword. Or don't understand why the daggers had the same counter kills as the tomahawk. Fast travel made you ask why they made it like they did. I mean, lets have the game load when you select a destination, then make you walk 4 steps, then cut you back off to load some more, then you are at the fast travel destination.

    But that's not to say it's a horrible game. It's good but not great.

  • Level 54
    Simon Says Bleed
    Posts: 1724
    User is Online
    Nov 27, 2012 6:17 pm GMT

    Sadly I agree. I was expecting so much more, and Connor is a wanker. Not even close to Altair or Ezio. Very poor character.

    "You know, a long time ago being crazy meant something. Nowadays everybody's crazy."

    - Charles Manson

    Sadly I agree. I was expecting so much more, and Connor is a wanker. Not even close to Altair or Ezio. Very poor character.

  • Level 25
    Defias Brotherhood
    Posts: 572
    User is Online
    Nov 27, 2012 6:43 pm GMT
    It was ok, it had it's moments. ... gotta join the choir tho, AC2 was better.
    --------
    Newt: My mommy always said there were no monsters - no real ones - but there are.
    It was ok, it had it's moments. ... gotta join the choir tho, AC2 was better.
  • Level 29
    Radiant Silvergun
    Posts: 2249
    Nov 29, 2012 5:27 pm GMT

    DrRockso87 wrote:

    I agree. Probably my most anticipated title of this year and it was just disappointing. The combat is great, so are the naval battles, graphics, etc. But Connor is a very weak protagonist. He's not as charming nor interesting as Altair or Ezio, which is surprising considering his background:

    ***SPOILER***

    I really wish the game starred Haytham. Much more interesting, charming, enjoyable character. He has a certain style and confidence that I loved that Connor just lacks. Connor just comes off sounding like a whinny adolescent most of the time.

    The mission design is pretty disappointing too. I expected really epic battles judging by the trailers and the new engine sporting "thousands of NPCs on screen"but nope. You usually have scripted events or else you're desynchronized. Even the stealth seems lacking. It's even more linear than the previous games. You're pulled along on a string to play how the developers want you to without much room for experimenting how to complete a mission (thank God for Hitman: Absolution and Dishonored coming out this Fall; I almost forget what stealth games were like).

    Still, it has plenty of good factors. I'd say a 7/10. Very disappointing due to the hype but overall not bad. Still good-alright.

    i couldnt agree more. this is exactly what i thought. i seriously don't understand what they were thinking with the main character in this one when in the previous games they had such a strong protaganist. i too thought that the game should've starred haytham, he reminded me of Ezio. he was way more intriguing, thats the kind of main character this game needed to make it great.

    i had a feeling it would be kind of dissapointing as soon as i heard that they were doing a native character and the setting was america. so i didn't get my hopes up too much. but a good game nonetheless, i enjoyed it and i bought it anyways to complete my AC collection.

    PSN: sadisticXIII

    [QUOTE="DrRockso87"]

    I agree. Probably my most anticipated title of this year and it was just disappointing. The combat is great, so are the naval battles, graphics, etc. But Connor is a very weak protagonist. He's not as charming nor interesting as Altair or Ezio, which is surprising considering his background: [spoiler] Connor's father is a Templar colonist and his mother was Native American, plus he was raised as an assassin; how do you make THAT boring?! [/spoiler]

    I really wish the game starred Haytham. Much more interesting, charming, enjoyable character. He has a certain style and confidence that I loved that Connor just lacks. Connor just comes off sounding like a whinny adolescent most of the time.

    The mission design is pretty disappointing too. I expected really epic battles judging by the trailers and the new engine sporting "thousands of NPCs on screen"but nope. You usually have scripted events or else you're desynchronized. Even the stealth seems lacking. It's even more linear than the previous games. You're pulled along on a string to play how the developers want you to without much room for experimenting how to complete a mission (thank God for Hitman: Absolution and Dishonored coming out this Fall; I almost forget what stealth games were like).

    Still, it has plenty of good factors. I'd say a 7/10. Very disappointing due to the hype but overall not bad. Still good-alright.

    [/QUOTE]

    i couldnt agree more. this is exactly what i thought. i seriously don't understand what they were thinking with the main character in this one when in the previous games they had such a strong protaganist. i too thought that the game should've starred haytham, he reminded me of Ezio. he was way more intriguing, thats the kind of main character this game needed to make it great.

    i had a feeling it would be kind of dissapointing as soon as i heard that they were doing a native character and the setting was america. so i didn't get my hopes up too much. but a good game nonetheless, i enjoyed it and i bought it anyways to complete my AC collection.

  • Level 42
    Karnov
    Posts: 11963
    User is Online
    Nov 29, 2012 10:33 pm GMT
    I haven't beaten it yet, but can someone please answer me with a simple yes or no answer: Do they at all explain how it is they came about a Native American heritage for the main character? We go from the Crusades, to Renaissance Italy to...Native American The logic is lost on me.
    Proud non-owner of any and all Apple products.
    I haven't beaten it yet, but can someone please answer me with a simple yes or no answer: Do they at all explain how it is they came about a Native American heritage for the main character? We go from the Crusades, to Renaissance Italy to...Native American :| The logic is lost on me.
  • Level 29
    Radiant Silvergun
    Posts: 2249
    Nov 29, 2012 10:36 pm GMT

    Kravyn81 wrote:
    I haven't beaten it yet, but can someone please answer me with a simple yes or no answer: Do they at all explain how it is they came about a Native American heritage for the main character? We go from the Crusades, to Renaissance Italy to...Native American The logic is lost on me.

    yeah they show you the story of how hes born and you get to play him as a kid and stuff. worst main character in gaming in a while.

    PSN: sadisticXIII

    [QUOTE="Kravyn81"]I haven't beaten it yet, but can someone please answer me with a simple yes or no answer: Do they at all explain how it is they came about a Native American heritage for the main character? We go from the Crusades, to Renaissance Italy to...Native American :| The logic is lost on me.[/QUOTE]

    yeah they show you the story of how hes born and you get to play him as a kid and stuff. worst main character in gaming in a while.

  • Level 14
    Ring King
    Posts: 82
    Dec 2, 2012 1:56 pm GMT

    I agree

    Pplaysttaion Plus

    I agree

Forum Actions
ForumsSony PlayStation 3 › AC3 Was a dissapointment who else agrees