System Wars is a one of a kind destination where gamers can discuss, rant, and debate about systems, platforms, handhelds and the games. Not many people survive System Wars. The mightiest system warriors back up their arguments with facts.
Rules are simple:
- Read the Terms of Use and System Wars Survival Guide.
- Must be Level 10 or higher to create topics.
- Keep your discussions around what belongs here: platforms, games, developers, publishers, and stats.
- Don't quote more than one image in your post.
- Do NOT post or bump extremely abusive discussions (adult material/illegal activities/illegal advertising/etc).
Is the PS3 comeback to beat the 360 in sales the greatest in gaming history?
- Nov 20, 2012 7:49 am GMT
gamertag: senor blanco PSN id: senor_blanco
[QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"][QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"]Oh look a couple of alts congratulating each other for page after page on each others untruths :lol: Now I see why WLB calls cows charlie sheens, winning no matter what![/QUOTE] how is last place 360 treating you?[/QUOTE] How is fellating a piece of plastic treating you, Arbitor?- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 3:02 pm GMT
lol
[IMG]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a338/WilliamRLBaker/charlie_sheen____winning___by_rejectorofdelusion-d3cebfz.jpg[/IMG]
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 3:19 pm GMT

The funniest thing to me is that at no time did anyone stop and look at the road Sony took to get to an arguable second place tie. Back when this generation started the BEST case scenario people thought the Xbox could achieve was selling about the same number of systems as Sony. MS placed Sony in a position of either losing this generation badly, or losing TONS of money to keep up. Sony didn't even put enough pressure on MS to make them lower their prices any significant amount in what 5 years now? Can you imagine how the numbers would look if MS had decided to cut in to their profits on the 360 and aggressively outprice the PS3 the entire gen? MS could have had a true 149 or even 99 dollar 360 YEARS ago and still not have been losing as much money per unit as sony at any given time. Instead MS chose to maintain their profits while still keeping Sony at arms length. MS could have buried Sony long ago if they chose to, but why bother when you're making money and still forcing your competitor to lose money. The only thing Sony did this generation was show that they were willing to bite the bullet and half kill themselves to keep the PS3 viable. Any patting on the back for the PS3 "coming back" is foolish IMO.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 3:20 pm GMTLets see who get closer.sts106mat wrote:any idea what the PS4 will cost? the steam box just announced its going be retailing at $1000...PS4 could be priced the same or even more.[QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"]^^^ also milking its users with peripherals such as hard drives, and wireless adapters, and tricking them into thinking the 360 was the cheapest also secured last place for the 360[/QUOTE]i got my 360 WITH a HDD for 140 quid less than a Ps3 would cost, wireless is optional but the 360 now has it as standard anyway, At least MS added stuff to the 360 like wireless, Extra USB ports and support for Flash memory and didn't take anything away like OtherOS, USB ports, backwards compatibility, etc,etc. And at least ididn't have to pay out Extra for a HDMI cable to Play in HD,lol.[/QUOTE] Don't forget "Rumble is last gen" *6 months later* "Here's a 50 euro rumble controller, SUCK IT you loyal early adoptors!"[/QUOTE] Don't forget motion sucks only to release a $150 dollar camera.lol
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 3:24 pm GMT[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="locopatho"][QUOTE="delta3074"]i got my 360 WITH a HDD for 140 quid less than a Ps3 would cost, wireless is optional but the 360 now has it as standard anyway, At least MS added stuff to the 360 like wireless, Extra USB ports and support for Flash memory and didn't take anything away like OtherOS, USB ports, backwards compatibility, etc,etc. And at least ididn't have to pay out Extra for a HDMI cable to Play in HD,lol.[/QUOTE] Don't forget "Rumble is last gen" *6 months later* "Here's a 50 euro rumble controller, SUCK IT you loyal early adoptors!"[/QUOTE] Don't forget motion sucks online to release a $150 dollar camera.lol[/QUOTE] ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh sht :lol: plus cost of 6 months supply of batteries :lol:
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 3:24 pm GMTLets see who get closer.sts106mat wrote:any idea what the PS4 will cost? the steam box just announced its going be retailing at $1000...PS4 could be priced the same or even more.[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"]^^^ also milking its users with peripherals such as hard drives, and wireless adapters, and tricking them into thinking the 360 was the cheapest also secured last place for the 360[/QUOTE]i got my 360 WITH a HDD for 140 quid less than a Ps3 would cost, wireless is optional but the 360 now has it as standard anyway, At least MS added stuff to the 360 like wireless, Extra USB ports and support for Flash memory and didn't take anything away like OtherOS, USB ports, backwards compatibility, etc,etc. And at least ididn't have to pay out Extra for a HDMI cable to Play in HD,lol.[/QUOTE] Your number are always screwed up i have prove that many times. HDMI was $10 for me on 2006,any cable would work now how was that $99 dollar wifi adapter that on PC was $10 and which the PS3 and even the wii included.? Wait HD-DVD $200? Oh wait $20 more for batteries and charger,how are those $60 a year for online play.? How is your 4th 360.? How many weeks without playing because of RROD or did you had a back up one.? Yeah both companies have their share of blunders,but MS and the xbox 360 are king on that field this gen.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 3:26 pm GMT
gamertag: senor blanco PSN id: senor_blanco
[QUOTE="tormentos"] Don't forget motion sucks online to release a $150 dollar camera.lol[/QUOTE] What the f*ck was that, Eltormo? Your awful attempt at a sentence?
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 3:29 pm GMT
[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"]^^^ also milking its users with peripherals such as hard drives, and wireless adapters, and tricking them into thinking the 360 was the cheapest also secured last place for the 360[/QUOTE]i got my 360 WITH a HDD for 140 quid less than a Ps3 would cost, wireless is optional but the 360 now has it as standard anyway, At least MS added stuff to the 360 like wireless, Extra USB ports and support for Flash memory and didn't take anything away like OtherOS, USB ports, backwards compatibility, etc,etc. And at least ididn't have to pay out Extra for a HDMI cable to Play in HD,lol.[/QUOTE] Your number are always screwed up i have prove that many times. HDMI was $10 for me on 2006,any cable would work now how was that $99 dollar wifi adapter that on PC was $10 and which the PS3 and even the wii included.? Wait HD-DVD $200? Oh wait $20 more for batteries and charger,how are those $60 a year for online play.? How is your 4th 360.? How many weeks without playing because of RROD or did you had a back up one.? Yeah both companies have their share of blunders,but MS and the xbox 360 are king on that field this gen.[/QUOTE]
lol the wifi adpator for 10 dollars that worked on the 360? lol wait 600 dollars for ps3 because of bluray, wait 45 dollars for controller, 15 dollars for chrarger matching the price of the ps3 controller 59.99...
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 3:32 pm GMT
gamertag: senor blanco PSN id: senor_blanco
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"][QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="delta3074"]i got my 360 WITH a HDD for 140 quid less than a Ps3 would cost, wireless is optional but the 360 now has it as standard anyway, At least MS added stuff to the 360 like wireless, Extra USB ports and support for Flash memory and didn't take anything away like OtherOS, USB ports, backwards compatibility, etc,etc. And at least ididn't have to pay out Extra for a HDMI cable to Play in HD,lol.[/QUOTE] Your number are always screwed up i have prove that many times. HDMI was $10 for me on 2006,any cable would work now how was that $99 dollar wifi adapter that on PC was $10 and which the PS3 and even the wii included.? Wait HD-DVD $200? Oh wait $20 more for batteries and charger,how are those $60 a year for online play.? How is your 4th 360.? How many weeks without playing because of RROD or did you had a back up one.? Yeah both companies have their share of blunders,but MS and the xbox 360 are king on that field this gen.[/QUOTE]
lol the wifi adpator for 10 dollars that worked on the 360? lol wait 600 dollars for ps3 because of bluray, wait 45 dollars for controller, 15 dollars for chrarger matching the price of the ps3 controller 59.99...
[/QUOTE] You actually understood that mess?- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 4:01 pm GMT
[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"]^^^ also milking its users with peripherals such as hard drives, and wireless adapters, and tricking them into thinking the 360 was the cheapest also secured last place for the 360[/QUOTE]i got my 360 WITH a HDD for 140 quid less than a Ps3 would cost, wireless is optional but the 360 now has it as standard anyway, At least MS added stuff to the 360 like wireless, Extra USB ports and support for Flash memory and didn't take anything away like OtherOS, USB ports, backwards compatibility, etc,etc. And at least ididn't have to pay out Extra for a HDMI cable to Play in HD,lol.[/QUOTE] Your number are always screwed up i have prove that many times. HDMI was $10 for me on 2006,any cable would work now how was that $99 dollar wifi adapter that on PC was $10 and which the PS3 and even the wii included.? Wait HD-DVD $200? Oh wait $20 more for batteries and charger,how are those $60 a year for online play.? How is your 4th 360.? How many weeks without playing because of RROD or did you had a back up one.? Yeah both companies have their share of blunders,but MS and the xbox 360 are king on that field this gen.[/QUOTE]i was talking in my own personal experience, the 360 HAS cost me less than a Ps3 woul have,Why do you always list Optional items to boost the cost, i have no use for a HD-DVD add on, i bought my console to play games, not watch movies, i pay 50p a week for batteries and i have had a year and a half of Live, still cheaper than the launch Price of a Ps3, listen dude, when are you going to get it, For me personally the 360 has still been cheaper than the cost of a Ps3, how am i figures messed up when i am talking about my own personal Experience and stop saying you proved me wrong many times, Thats just BS pure and simple.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 4:29 pm GMT
Comeback for second place, at the end of the generation, when analysts expected it to be first and it started of disasterfully.
Well,, that's something.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 4:30 pm GMTLets see who get closer.sts106mat wrote:any idea what the PS4 will cost? the steam box just announced its going be retailing at $1000...PS4 could be priced the same or even more.[QUOTE="Steppy_76"]
The funniest thing to me is that at no time did anyone stop and look at the road Sony took to get to an arguable second place tie. Back when this generation started the BEST case scenario people thought the Xbox could achieve was selling about the same number of systems as Sony. MS placed Sony in a position of either losing this generation badly, or losing TONS of money to keep up. Sony didn't even put enough pressure on MS to make them lower their prices any significant amount in what 5 years now? Can you imagine how the numbers would look if MS had decided to cut in to their profits on the 360 and aggressively outprice the PS3 the entire gen? MS could have had a true 149 or even 99 dollar 360 YEARS ago and still not have been losing as much money per unit as sony at any given time. Instead MS chose to maintain their profits while still keeping Sony at arms length. MS could have buried Sony long ago if they chose to, but why bother when you're making money and still forcing your competitor to lose money. The only thing Sony did this generation was show that they were willing to bite the bullet and half kill themselves to keep the PS3 viable. Any patting on the back for the PS3 "coming back" is foolish IMO.
[/QUOTE] MS loss 3.1 billion dollars this gen that would have kill any profits and any chance of getting any. The xbox 360 has been price lower the entire generation from $100 on launch on the best model to $200 cheaper how much more aggressive could they get.? Aggressive pricing did not save the original xbox which had better hardware and HDD out of the box and was price like the PS2 costing MS 4 billions in losses in just 25 million units sold.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 4:44 pm GMT[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="Steppy_76"]
The funniest thing to me is that at no time did anyone stop and look at the road Sony took to get to an arguable second place tie. Back when this generation started the BEST case scenario people thought the Xbox could achieve was selling about the same number of systems as Sony. MS placed Sony in a position of either losing this generation badly, or losing TONS of money to keep up. Sony didn't even put enough pressure on MS to make them lower their prices any significant amount in what 5 years now? Can you imagine how the numbers would look if MS had decided to cut in to their profits on the 360 and aggressively outprice the PS3 the entire gen? MS could have had a true 149 or even 99 dollar 360 YEARS ago and still not have been losing as much money per unit as sony at any given time. Instead MS chose to maintain their profits while still keeping Sony at arms length. MS could have buried Sony long ago if they chose to, but why bother when you're making money and still forcing your competitor to lose money. The only thing Sony did this generation was show that they were willing to bite the bullet and half kill themselves to keep the PS3 viable. Any patting on the back for the PS3 "coming back" is foolish IMO.
[/QUOTE] MS loss 3.1 billion dollars this gen that would have kill any profits and any chance of getting any. The xbox 360 has been price lower the entire generation from $100 on launch on the best model to $200 cheaper how much more aggressive could they get.? Aggressive pricing did not save the original xbox which had better hardware and HDD out of the box and was price like the PS2 costing MS 4 billions in losses in just 25 million units sold.[/QUOTE] lol I love when you try to make some sort of sense el tormo.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 4:54 pm GMT[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="Steppy_76"]
The funniest thing to me is that at no time did anyone stop and look at the road Sony took to get to an arguable second place tie. Back when this generation started the BEST case scenario people thought the Xbox could achieve was selling about the same number of systems as Sony. MS placed Sony in a position of either losing this generation badly, or losing TONS of money to keep up. Sony didn't even put enough pressure on MS to make them lower their prices any significant amount in what 5 years now? Can you imagine how the numbers would look if MS had decided to cut in to their profits on the 360 and aggressively outprice the PS3 the entire gen? MS could have had a true 149 or even 99 dollar 360 YEARS ago and still not have been losing as much money per unit as sony at any given time. Instead MS chose to maintain their profits while still keeping Sony at arms length. MS could have buried Sony long ago if they chose to, but why bother when you're making money and still forcing your competitor to lose money. The only thing Sony did this generation was show that they were willing to bite the bullet and half kill themselves to keep the PS3 viable. Any patting on the back for the PS3 "coming back" is foolish IMO.
[/QUOTE] MS loss 3.1 billion dollars this gen that would have kill any profits and any chance of getting any. The xbox 360 has been price lower the entire generation from $100 on launch on the best model to $200 cheaper how much more aggressive could they get.? Aggressive pricing did not save the original xbox which had better hardware and HDD out of the box and was price like the PS2 costing MS 4 billions in losses in just 25 million units sold.[/QUOTE] LOL WUT?- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 5:01 pm GMT
So how'd the PS3 lineup for this year go?- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 5:03 pm GMTThe greatest comeback this gen had to be Playstation Allstars smashing the doubters by getting universal acclaim, AAA scores and huge sales. Oh wait......
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 20, 2012 5:05 pm GMT

[QUOTE="gensigns"]The greatest comeback this gen had to be Playstation Allstars smashing the doubters by getting universal acclaim, AAA scores and huge sales. Oh wait......[/QUOTE]
A score on MC and below A on GS says hi unless you're being sarcastic.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 23, 2012 5:19 am GMTLets see who get closer.sts106mat wrote:any idea what the PS4 will cost? the steam box just announced its going be retailing at $1000...PS4 could be priced the same or even more.[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]lol the wifi adpator for 10 dollars that worked on the 360? lol wait 600 dollars for ps3 because of bluray, wait 45 dollars for controller, 15 dollars for chrarger matching the price of the ps3 controller 59.99...[/QUOTE] Yeah on 2005 there wasn't any $10 dollar wifi adapter dude stop inventing crap. $600 PS3 which included. Wifi $99 on 360. Media Card Reader no available on 360. 60GB HDD the xbox 360 one was 20 GB and any HDD was $100 so you need 2 more to match the PS3 one. Free online play on 360 $50 dollars per year by that time. Blu-ray stand alone $1,000 dollars,the closes thing on 360 and wasn't use for games was $200. $200 -HD-DVD. $50 Live. $20 play and charge kit. $100 wifi adapter $200 2 extra 20HDD.. Yes all this count you can talk all the sh** you want the fact is that this ^^^ was need it to match the PS3 $600 unit if you wanted a similar experience on 360 that is a fact..
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 23, 2012 5:21 am GMTLets see who get closer.sts106mat wrote:any idea what the PS4 will cost? the steam box just announced its going be retailing at $1000...PS4 could be priced the same or even more.[QUOTE="clone01"]
[QUOTE="tormentos"] Don't forget motion sucks online to release a $150 dollar camera.lol[/QUOTE] What the f*ck was that, Eltormo? Your awful attempt at a sentence?
[/QUOTE] Hey lame01 still chasing alter and asking for gamers cards..lol- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Nov 23, 2012 7:09 am GMT
A picture befitting this thread.
Cows = Michael Jordan
Lemmings = Craig Ehlo
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.



.jpg)



