[QUOTE="khoofia_pika"]

AC3 is actually pretty disappointing. It's a good game, but I don't know, parts of it just didn't click. It's story was disappointing, it's characters weren't well developed, Connor was boring, there was no stealth, the ending was ass, and it was also historically inaccurate in parts (not that I care usually, but it's an AC game, and AC games pride themselves on being historically accurate).

I did love Haytham though, I wish we get a game with him as the lead.

It's still a good game, but I'd say it's the second weakest in the series after Revelations.

[/QUOTE] Characters aren't well developed? They are far better developed than ANY Assassin's Creed game. Connor is actually a more complete protagonist in ACIII than Ezio was in ACII. And unlike ACII, the side characters get FAR better development. Achilles espcially. Sorry, but you are overrating past games in the series. They do worse in the problems you peg ACIII for. Historically inaccurate? So is the other games in the series.

[QUOTE="LustForSoul"]I have to agree with you. Haytham was really interesting whereas Connor never seemed to grow up in character. It's good to see they changed the game this much though.[/QUOTE] Connor doesn't grow? Are you kidding....he grows more than Ezio does in ACII and he develops the characters around him. Connor does in one game what Ezio had to do in three....be a full developed character. Nevermind ACIII being the best paced AC, the one strongest with its themes, and the riskiest introducing a false protagonist.

[QUOTE="charizard1605"]Disappointing relative to what I expected and wanted this game to be, definitely. It's still a great game, though. And I do take issue with a lot of the stuff you say in the OP: + The game had the best combat in the series + Freerunning was incredible, especially in the Frontier + The game nailed the atmosphere + Haytham and Achilles were awesome characters + There was so. Much. Stuff. To. Do. + Dem naval battles. + Connor's story was great (albeit a bit poorly paced in the beginning) + Connor's story had a beautiful, poignant end + Great geographical and temporal accuracy - So many glitches and bugs - Decreased emphasis on stealth - Some of the Full Synchronization objectives were f*cking retarded, and couldn't possibly be achieved in one attempt - Those forced chase sequences. WHY? - The game fails to justify why Charles Lee is the villain in the first place. - Desmond's story had the most awful ending ever - The controls weren't as good as the previous games - Over aggressive AI at times. [/QUOTE] Lee may be the main antagonist, but he is not the Big Bad.....Haytham is. Sometimes the main anatgonist isn't the biggest anatagonist.