Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsOff-Topic Discussion › Atheist questionnaire

The Classic Off-Topic forum is a place where games or platforms discussions are taboo. Here, you can talk about just about anything outside of games, just make sure to stay classy and follow the rules.

Forum Rules:
- Follow the Terms of Use and read the FAQ.
- Keep your discussions friendly and respectful of others.
- Keep the discussions work friendly. More details in the FAQ (For something more laid back go to Off Topic: After Hours
- Game and platform discussions NOT allowed (For that go to the Primary Games Board or System Wars.
- Do NOT post or bump extremely abusive discussions.
- Hate speech not permitted.

Atheist questionnaire

Forum Actions
  • Level 44
    Violence Fight
    Posts: 21444
    Site Greeter
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:10 pm GMT
    Slashless wrote:

    FelipeInside wrote:
    I do not respond to bare insults.

    >I don't respond

    >responds



    Again, do u have anything to contribute?

    Intel i7 3770 3.40Ghz | Asus Sabertooth | 32GB 1600Mhz DDR3 RAM | 240GB SSD | GTX680 4GB

    [QUOTE="Slashless"]

    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"] I do not respond to bare insults. [/QUOTE]

    >I don't respond

    >responds

    [/QUOTE] Again, do u have anything to contribute?
  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 26998
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:10 pm GMT

    FelipeInside wrote:
    Zeviander wrote:
    FelipeInside wrote:
    Come back when you want to try to understand what we are trying to explain.
    I'm sorry, I don't want my IQ to drop 50 points, thanks.
    I'll let you go, we were trying to help and u have just resorted to plain insults now. Next time try to stay respectful with people with different points of view, or else you will never get respect urself.

    That's funny...

    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Zeviander"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"]Come back when you want to try to understand what we are trying to explain.[/QUOTE] I'm sorry, I don't want my IQ to drop 50 points, thanks.[/QUOTE] I'll let you go, we were trying to help and u have just resorted to plain insults now. Next time try to stay respectful with people with different points of view, or else you will never get respect urself.[/QUOTE]

    That's funny...

  • Level 36
    Radical Ninja
    Posts: 9857
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:10 pm GMT

    FelipeInside wrote:
    Again, do u have anything to contribute?

    Mr.Ranger I have a question.

    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"] Again, do u have anything to contribute?[/QUOTE]

    Mr.Ranger I have a question.

  • Level 64
    Easter Egg
    Posts: 20120
    Nov 7, 2012 10:11 pm GMT
    FelipeInside wrote:

    Zeviander wrote:
    FelipeInside wrote:
    "my intention was never for him to think we are right and he is wrong,"

    Stop proving our point if ur not willing to accept it.
    Now I can be almost 100% certain you are a troll. Devolving to txt language pretty much seals it.

    Like ur almost 100% certain that Science has all the answers and if not, you'll just sit and wait for them instead of thinking for urself?



    Look at this. What does thinking for yourself and then extrapolating those ideas without any backing achieve in terms of answers? Any answer you come across are only going to be true for your own transient self. All you're doing is making things up with no evidence. I have some ideas that are absolutely insane, completely irrational with almost no chance at being true and I would never, never pass those off as anything that could compete with evidence. Science doesn't have all the answers but given infinite time, it will by it's very nature. Your own transient mind is so much smaller in scope and capability of understanding than the entire combined power of humanity. Science doesn't sit and wait and as such anyone who puts stock in it will never be sitting waiting and not thinking for themselves because that sort of behavior is counter-intuitive to the advancement of science.



    You're trying to say that someone who puts stock in science is closed minded which by the very nature of how science works is an oxymoron.
    Edited on Nov 7, 2012 10:14 pm GMT Edited 2 total times.
    _______________________________________________________________
    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"]

    [QUOTE="Zeviander"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"]"my intention was never for him to think we are right and he is wrong,"

    Stop proving our point if ur not willing to accept it.[/QUOTE] Now I can be almost 100% certain you are a troll. Devolving to txt language pretty much seals it.[/QUOTE]

    Like ur almost 100% certain that Science has all the answers and if not, you'll just sit and wait for them instead of thinking for urself?[/QUOTE] Look at this. What does thinking for yourself and then extrapolating those ideas without any backing achieve in terms of answers? Any answer you come across are only going to be true for your own transient self. All you're doing is making things up with no evidence. I have some ideas that are absolutely insane, completely irrational with almost no chance at being true and I would never, never pass those off as anything that could compete with evidence. Science doesn't have all the answers but given infinite time, it will by it's very nature. Your own transient mind is so much smaller in scope and capability of understanding than the entire combined power of humanity. Science doesn't sit and wait and as such anyone who puts stock in it will never be sitting waiting and not thinking for themselves because that sort of behavior is counter-intuitive to the advancement of science.

    You're trying to say that someone who puts stock in science is closed minded which by the very nature of how science works is an oxymoron.
  • Level 44
    Violence Fight
    Posts: 21444
    Site Greeter
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:12 pm GMT
    [QUOTE="wis3boi"]

    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"]

    Zeviander wrote:

    That's funny...



    What part?
    Slashless wrote:

    FelipeInside wrote:
    Again, do u have anything to contribute?

    Mr.Ranger I have a question.



    Go troll somewhere else, we were having a nice conversation but had to ruin it. It's understandable this conversation may go above ur head, and that u need to resort to empty insults to be part of it, but trust me.... contributing something worthwhile reading is so much better.

    Intel i7 3770 3.40Ghz | Asus Sabertooth | 32GB 1600Mhz DDR3 RAM | 240GB SSD | GTX680 4GB

    [QUOTE="wis3boi"]

    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Zeviander"]

    That's funny...

    [/QUOTE] What part? [QUOTE="Slashless"]

    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"] Again, do u have anything to contribute?[/QUOTE]

    Mr.Ranger I have a question.

    [/QUOTE] Go troll somewhere else, we were having a nice conversation but had to ruin it. It's understandable this conversation may go above ur head, and that u need to resort to empty insults to be part of it, but trust me.... contributing something worthwhile reading is so much better.
  • Level 36
    Radical Ninja
    Posts: 9857
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:14 pm GMT

    FelipeInside wrote:
    Go troll somewhere else, we were having a nice conversation but had to ruin it. It's understandable this conversation may go above ur head, and that u need to resort to empty insults to be part of it, but trust me.... contributing something worthwhile reading is so much better.

    But you're a ranger.

    Here to help Gamespot users for any forum related queries.

    Please oblige by your duties.

    So can I ask you a question.

    Edited on Nov 7, 2012 10:14 pm GMT

    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"]Go troll somewhere else, we were having a nice conversation but had to ruin it. It's understandable this conversation may go above ur head, and that u need to resort to empty insults to be part of it, but trust me.... contributing something worthwhile reading is so much better.[/QUOTE]
    But you're a ranger.

    Here to help Gamespot users for any forum related queries.

    Please oblige by your duties.

    So can I ask you a question.

  • Level 32
    Snake Eater
    Posts: 9093
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:14 pm GMT
    FelipeInside wrote:
    Next time try to stay respectful with people with different points of view, or else you will never get respect urself.

    Why would I care if I got your respect?

    I respect your right to hold whatever point of view you want. I've already said that isn't the same as respecting the point of view.

    || AMD A8-4500M @ 1.9 GHz || AMD Radeon HD 7460G || 8 GB DDR3 || 750 GB HDD ||
    The Atheism Union || last.fm || Try avast! for free!
    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"]Next time try to stay respectful with people with different points of view, or else you will never get respect urself.[/QUOTE] Why would I care if I got your respect? I respect your right to hold whatever point of view you want. I've already said that isn't the same as respecting the point of view.
  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 26998
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:15 pm GMT

    FelipeInside wrote:
    What part?

    your entire argument in this thread.

    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"] What part? [/QUOTE]

    your entire argument in this thread.

  • Level 44
    Violence Fight
    Posts: 21444
    Site Greeter
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:15 pm GMT

    Ace6301 wrote:
    FelipeInside wrote:

    Zeviander wrote:
    Now I can be almost 100% certain you are a troll. Devolving to txt language pretty much seals it.

    Like ur almost 100% certain that Science has all the answers and if not, you'll just sit and wait for them instead of thinking for urself?

    Look at this. What does thinking for yourself achieve in terms of Answers? Any answer you come across are only going to be true for your own transient self. All you're doing is making things up with no evidence. I have some ideas that are absolutely insane, completely irrational with almost no chance at being true and I would never, never pass those off as anything that could compete with evidence. Science doesn't have all the answers but given infinite time, it will by it's very nature. Your own transient mind is so much smaller in scope and capability of understanding than the entire combined power of humanity. Science doesn't sit and wait and as such anyone who puts stock in it will never be sitting waiting and not thinking for themselves because that sort of behavior is counter-intuitive to the advancement of science.

    Like I never have.

    It won't. The Human Race will be extinct before Science knows 100% everything about the Universe and beyond.

    Yes, and what's wrong with talking about these theories? My point has ALWAYS been that I never put these theories on the same level as science, just theories about things science can't explain or doesn't have the evidence. Nothing wrong with thinking about them.

    Intel i7 3770 3.40Ghz | Asus Sabertooth | 32GB 1600Mhz DDR3 RAM | 240GB SSD | GTX680 4GB

    [QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"]

    [QUOTE="Zeviander"] Now I can be almost 100% certain you are a troll. Devolving to txt language pretty much seals it.[/QUOTE]

    Like ur almost 100% certain that Science has all the answers and if not, you'll just sit and wait for them instead of thinking for urself?[/QUOTE] Look at this. What does thinking for yourself achieve in terms of Answers? Any answer you come across are only going to be true for your own transient self. All you're doing is making things up with no evidence. I have some ideas that are absolutely insane, completely irrational with almost no chance at being true and I would never, never pass those off as anything that could compete with evidence. Science doesn't have all the answers but given infinite time, it will by it's very nature. Your own transient mind is so much smaller in scope and capability of understanding than the entire combined power of humanity. Science doesn't sit and wait and as such anyone who puts stock in it will never be sitting waiting and not thinking for themselves because that sort of behavior is counter-intuitive to the advancement of science.

    [/QUOTE]

    Like I never have.

    It won't. The Human Race will be extinct before Science knows 100% everything about the Universe and beyond.

    Yes, and what's wrong with talking about these theories? My point has ALWAYS been that I never put these theories on the same level as science, just theories about things science can't explain or doesn't have the evidence. Nothing wrong with thinking about them.

  • Level 44
    Violence Fight
    Posts: 21444
    Site Greeter
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:15 pm GMT
    Slashless wrote:

    FelipeInside wrote:
    Go troll somewhere else, we were having a nice conversation but had to ruin it. It's understandable this conversation may go above ur head, and that u need to resort to empty insults to be part of it, but trust me.... contributing something worthwhile reading is so much better.

    But you're a ranger.

    Here to help Gamespot users for any forum related queries.

    Please oblige by your duties.

    So can I ask you a question.



    What do you need fellow Gamespotter !!!

    Ranger is here to help

    Intel i7 3770 3.40Ghz | Asus Sabertooth | 32GB 1600Mhz DDR3 RAM | 240GB SSD | GTX680 4GB

    [QUOTE="Slashless"]

    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"]Go troll somewhere else, we were having a nice conversation but had to ruin it. It's understandable this conversation may go above ur head, and that u need to resort to empty insults to be part of it, but trust me.... contributing something worthwhile reading is so much better.[/QUOTE]
    But you're a ranger.

    Here to help Gamespot users for any forum related queries.

    Please oblige by your duties.

    So can I ask you a question.

    [/QUOTE] What do you need fellow Gamespotter !!! Ranger is here to help :)
  • Level 36
    Radical Ninja
    Posts: 9857
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:16 pm GMT

    FelipeInside wrote:
    What do you need fellow Gamespotter !!! Ranger is here to help

    Where do babies come from.

    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"] What do you need fellow Gamespotter !!! Ranger is here to help :)[/QUOTE]

    Where do babies come from.

  • Level 44
    Violence Fight
    Posts: 21444
    Site Greeter
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:17 pm GMT

    [QUOTE="Zeviander"]

    FelipeInside wrote:
    Why would I care if I got your respect? I respect your right to hold whatever point of view you want. I've already said that isn't the same as respecting the point of view.
    I don't want you to respect my point of view, I just wanted a personal theory from you and u never gave me one.
    wis3boi wrote:

    FelipeInside wrote:
    What part?

    your entire argument in this thread.

    Of course, cause it's a NON-scientific argument therefore it's funny.

    Intel i7 3770 3.40Ghz | Asus Sabertooth | 32GB 1600Mhz DDR3 RAM | 240GB SSD | GTX680 4GB

    [QUOTE="Zeviander"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"] Why would I care if I got your respect? I respect your right to hold whatever point of view you want. I've already said that isn't the same as respecting the point of view.[/QUOTE] I don't want you to respect my point of view, I just wanted a personal theory from you and u never gave me one. [QUOTE="wis3boi"]

    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"] What part? [/QUOTE]

    your entire argument in this thread.

    [/QUOTE] Of course, cause it's a NON-scientific argument therefore it's funny.

  • Level 44
    Violence Fight
    Posts: 21444
    Site Greeter
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:18 pm GMT
    Slashless wrote:

    FelipeInside wrote:
    What do you need fellow Gamespotter !!! Ranger is here to help

    Where do babies come from.



    Human babies?

    From Female Humans with the help of Male Sperm. Now remember, I might be a Ranger but I don't have ALL the answers, although I'll do my best to answer them.

    Intel i7 3770 3.40Ghz | Asus Sabertooth | 32GB 1600Mhz DDR3 RAM | 240GB SSD | GTX680 4GB

    [QUOTE="Slashless"]

    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"] What do you need fellow Gamespotter !!! Ranger is here to help :)[/QUOTE]

    Where do babies come from.

    [/QUOTE] Human babies? From Female Humans with the help of Male Sperm. Now remember, I might be a Ranger but I don't have ALL the answers, although I'll do my best to answer them.
  • Level 36
    Radical Ninja
    Posts: 9857
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:18 pm GMT

    FelipeInside wrote:
    Human babies? From Female Humans with the help of Male Sperm. Now remember, I might be a Ranger but I don't have ALL the answers, although I'll do my best to answer them.

    cool

    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"] Human babies? From Female Humans with the help of Male Sperm. Now remember, I might be a Ranger but I don't have ALL the answers, although I'll do my best to answer them.[/QUOTE]

    cool

  • Level 43
    Sword of Sodan
    Posts: 21130
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:19 pm GMT
    FelipeInside wrote:
    Zeviander wrote:
    sandbox3d wrote:
    You're not willing to look or think beyond what you've been told, so yes pretty much.

    Lord, you're an idiot.

    I accept the scientific explanation because I can see all the data and experiments right in front of me. I am not a professional scientist, so I can only go on what science has provided.

    If I decided to get a B.S./M.S./D.S., and pursue a career in research, then I could most certainly come up with my own ideas and have the means to test them.

    So are you also telling me I should pull things from my ass and put them in the same league as objectively verified explanations? Because I certainly am capable of doing that, I just choose not to.


    No No NOOOOOOOOOO. Why can't u understand something so simple?

    "So are you also telling me I should pull things from my ass and put them in the same league as objectively verified explanations?"
    NO, we are not saying that. We are saying come up with ur own theories to which Science has no explanation to. What is so wrong with that? "I accept the scientific explanation because I can see all the data and experiments right in front of me. "
    And that's FINE, no one is telling u not to. We are just talking about the stuff that scientific explanation DOESN'T have the data and experiments of.
    So you're saying make stuff up. Is he supposed to go out and test those hypotheses or should he just be happy with whatever they are? In the post you're quoting, he already said that if he were to pursue a career in research, he could test them.

    8) Mmmmm... 8)
    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Zeviander"][QUOTE="sandbox3d"]You're not willing to look or think beyond what you've been told, so yes pretty much.[/QUOTE] Lord, you're an idiot. I accept the scientific explanation because I can see all the data and experiments right in front of me. I am not a professional scientist, so I can only go on what science has provided. If I decided to get a B.S./M.S./D.S., and pursue a career in research, then I could most certainly come up with my own ideas and have the means to test them. So are you also telling me I should pull things from my ass and put them in the same league as objectively verified explanations? Because I certainly am capable of doing that, I just choose not to.[/QUOTE] No No NOOOOOOOOOO. Why can't u understand something so simple? "So are you also telling me I should pull things from my ass and put them in the same league as objectively verified explanations?" NO, we are not saying that. We are saying come up with ur own theories to which Science has no explanation to. What is so wrong with that? "I accept the scientific explanation because I can see all the data and experiments right in front of me. " And that's FINE, no one is telling u not to. We are just talking about the stuff that scientific explanation DOESN'T have the data and experiments of.[/QUOTE]So you're saying make stuff up. Is he supposed to go out and test those hypotheses or should he just be happy with whatever they are? In the post you're quoting, he already said that if he were to pursue a career in research, he could test them.
  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 26998
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:19 pm GMT

    FelipeInside wrote:

    Yes, and what's wrong with talking about these theories? My point has ALWAYS been that I never put these theories on the same level as science, just theories about things science can't explain or doesn't have the evidence. Nothing wrong with thinking about them.

    We are saying that talking about them is 100% useless. Whatever you come up with has no bearing on reality or anyone else but yourself. The way you word your sentences and arguments points that we should respect your ideas and not criticize them. You are welcome to believe whatever you wish, and I have every right to call those believes illogical and baseless.

    Why bring them up at all if you have no reason or evidence to believe them? I can have a dream or vision that jesus appeared to be, and so can you. If you said you had one of these visions, I have no real reason to question you did have one...but it doesn't do anything to make me think it's real or believe in your position. It's just heresay and random thoughts that only apply to the person claiming them. That makes it an empty useless statement.

    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"]

    Yes, and what's wrong with talking about these theories? My point has ALWAYS been that I never put these theories on the same level as science, just theories about things science can't explain or doesn't have the evidence. Nothing wrong with thinking about them.

    [/QUOTE]

    We are saying that talking about them is 100% useless. Whatever you come up with has no bearing on reality or anyone else but yourself. The way you word your sentences and arguments points that we should respect your ideas and not criticize them. You are welcome to believe whatever you wish, and I have every right to call those believes illogical and baseless.

    Why bring them up at all if you have no reason or evidence to believe them? I can have a dream or vision that jesus appeared to be, and so can you. If you said you had one of these visions, I have no real reason to question you did have one...but it doesn't do anything to make me think it's real or believe in your position. It's just heresay and random thoughts that only apply to the person claiming them. That makes it an empty useless statement.

  • Level 32
    Snake Eater
    Posts: 9093
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:19 pm GMT
    FelipeInside wrote:
    I just wanted a personal theory from you and u never gave me one.

    And I wanted an example of science being wrong.

    But we don't always get what we want.

    || AMD A8-4500M @ 1.9 GHz || AMD Radeon HD 7460G || 8 GB DDR3 || 750 GB HDD ||
    The Atheism Union || last.fm || Try avast! for free!
    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"]I just wanted a personal theory from you and u never gave me one. [/QUOTE] And I wanted an example of science being wrong. But we don't always get what we want.
  • Level 63
    Big Smoke
    Posts: 26998
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:20 pm GMT

    Zeviander wrote:
    FelipeInside wrote:
    I just wanted a personal theory from you and u never gave me one.
    And I wanted an example of science being wrong. But we don't always get what we want.

    Someone caught this act on film! :O

    [QUOTE="Zeviander"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"]I just wanted a personal theory from you and u never gave me one. [/QUOTE] And I wanted an example of science being wrong. But we don't always get what we want.[/QUOTE]

    [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JCtiDx9pX8]Someone caught this act on film! :O[/url]

  • Level 47
    Jaquio
    Posts: 17410
    User is Online
    Nov 7, 2012 10:21 pm GMT

    brucewayne69 wrote:

    This isn't intended to start an arguement between theists and atheists. I just want to know, from atheists, what their thoughts are on certain things.

    1. Do you think the Ark of the Covenant ever existed, regardless of whether or not it had powers? No

    2. Do you think Jesus ever existed? Yes, and he was a great man

    3. Do you think a Moses ever existed? I mean, the exodus happened, but whether or not they were led by Moses is up for date. kinda

    4. Do you look down on theists? Kinda, most of them mean well

    5. Do you disagree with organized religion? Yes

    6. Have you ever voted Republican? Hell no

    7. Did "Noah's Flood" ever happen? Global, regional, local scale whatever. Can't say

    8. Would you became a Christian in the event of the second coming of Jesus? Or Jewish if a new messiah (proven) would come? No, too proud. Its alread too late, I rather stick to my beliefs then use Jesus to be "saved"

    9. Anything you would like to add. I like food?

    You should follow me on tumblr. Shirtless pic of me included I follow back

    [QUOTE="brucewayne69"]

    This isn't intended to start an arguement between theists and atheists. I just want to know, from atheists, what their thoughts are on certain things.

    1. Do you think the Ark of the Covenant ever existed, regardless of whether or not it had powers? No

    2. Do you think Jesus ever existed? Yes, and he was a great man

    3. Do you think a Moses ever existed? I mean, the exodus happened, but whether or not they were led by Moses is up for date. kinda

    4. Do you look down on theists? Kinda, most of them mean well

    5. Do you disagree with organized religion? Yes

    6. Have you ever voted Republican? Hell no

    7. Did "Noah's Flood" ever happen? Global, regional, local scale whatever. Can't say

    8. Would you became a Christian in the event of the second coming of Jesus? Or Jewish if a new messiah (proven) would come? No, too proud. Its alread too late, I rather stick to my beliefs then use Jesus to be "saved"

    9. Anything you would like to add. I like food?

    [/QUOTE]

  • Level 64
    Easter Egg
    Posts: 20120
    Nov 7, 2012 10:22 pm GMT
    FelipeInside wrote:

    Ace6301 wrote:
    FelipeInside wrote:

    Like ur almost 100% certain that Science has all the answers and if not, you'll just sit and wait for them instead of thinking for urself?

    Look at this. What does thinking for yourself achieve in terms of Answers? Any answer you come across are only going to be true for your own transient self. All you're doing is making things up with no evidence. I have some ideas that are absolutely insane, completely irrational with almost no chance at being true and I would never, never pass those off as anything that could compete with evidence. Science doesn't have all the answers but given infinite time, it will by it's very nature. Your own transient mind is so much smaller in scope and capability of understanding than the entire combined power of humanity. Science doesn't sit and wait and as such anyone who puts stock in it will never be sitting waiting and not thinking for themselves because that sort of behavior is counter-intuitive to the advancement of science.

    Like I never have.

    It won't. The Human Race will be extinct before Science knows 100% everything about the Universe and beyond.

    Yes, and what's wrong with talking about these theories? My point has ALWAYS been that I never put these theories on the same level as science, just theories about things science can't explain or doesn't have the evidence. Nothing wrong with thinking about them.



    Then why argue that a stance based purely from science is closed minded? If using the evidence is still superior to you then what's wrong with sticking to what the evidence shows?

    An assumption

    Why are you so hostile about theories you can't, or won't, explain? No one here is saying irrational theories should not be thought by anyone and no one here is saying such arguments are useless. You are however arguing with someone who said science and irrational theories are not on the same level.
    Edited on Nov 7, 2012 10:23 pm GMT
    _______________________________________________________________
    [QUOTE="FelipeInside"]

    [QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="FelipeInside"]

    Like ur almost 100% certain that Science has all the answers and if not, you'll just sit and wait for them instead of thinking for urself?[/QUOTE] Look at this. What does thinking for yourself achieve in terms of Answers? Any answer you come across are only going to be true for your own transient self. All you're doing is making things up with no evidence. I have some ideas that are absolutely insane, completely irrational with almost no chance at being true and I would never, never pass those off as anything that could compete with evidence. Science doesn't have all the answers but given infinite time, it will by it's very nature. Your own transient mind is so much smaller in scope and capability of understanding than the entire combined power of humanity. Science doesn't sit and wait and as such anyone who puts stock in it will never be sitting waiting and not thinking for themselves because that sort of behavior is counter-intuitive to the advancement of science.

    [/QUOTE]

    Like I never have.

    It won't. The Human Race will be extinct before Science knows 100% everything about the Universe and beyond.

    Yes, and what's wrong with talking about these theories? My point has ALWAYS been that I never put these theories on the same level as science, just theories about things science can't explain or doesn't have the evidence. Nothing wrong with thinking about them.

    [/QUOTE] Then why argue that a stance based purely from science is closed minded? If using the evidence is still superior to you then what's wrong with sticking to what the evidence shows? An assumption

    Why are you so hostile about theories you can't, or won't, explain? No one here is saying irrational theories should not be thought by anyone and no one here is saying such arguments are useless. You are however arguing with someone who said science and irrational theories are not on the same level.
Forum Actions
ForumsOff-Topic Discussion › Atheist questionnaire