- Sep 21, 2012 6:07 pm GMT
I'm having trouble deciding between these two cards..
All of the benchmarks make it seem like it's dependent on the game and since the 7870 is about $60 cheaper, I'm leaning towards that. However, that means that I won't have access to physx and the 660 ti comes with Borderlands 2, which I plan on buying anyway.
What do you guys think?
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 21, 2012 6:16 pm GMTloosingENDS Wisdom:
My PC is not a gaming PC in the sense that does not have a GPU that will run games in playable frame rates, other than that is a DX11 GPU that will run any game in any setting
Was xbox 360 based on a 9800 pro of 2003 ?
No, it was based on a 8800GTX of 2006
GTX 660ti is the bettter buy because it is faster then the 7870 by 10-15% and it includes BL2
So in the end their around the same price if you include 7870 + BL2
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- [QUOTE="starwarsgeek112"]
I'm having trouble deciding between these two cards..
All of the benchmarks make it seem like it's dependent on the game and since the 7870 is about $60 cheaper, I'm leaning towards that. However, that means that I won't have access to physx and the 660 ti comes with Borderlands 2, which I plan on buying anyway.
What do you guys think?
[/QUOTE] I watched a demo of Borderlands 2 playing with the Physics from Nvidia and the other video without. The explosions and extras looked a lot better on the Nvidia card. Then again, I think a lot of the games are partnering with these GPU makers to utilize there games. Seeing it more and more. Either way, i think both those cards are good, but from what I've been hearing the 660 is at the top of food chain currently.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 21, 2012 11:01 pm GMTCommunication using human language has the sole purpose of finding ways to program into the subroutines of people's minds the subliminal message of "How can I help you, help me?".
Zubin ✈====❇✈ Dead_Pilot
GTX 660 because way too many of the games that would stress the GPUs would perform better on the 660 :P- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 22, 2012 1:07 am GMT
-------------------------

AMD Phenom II 1100T X6 @3.66GHz | Gigabyte Radeon HD 7950 3GB | Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 AM3+ | 8gb Kingston Hyper X Blu @1466| 500w Corsair Builder Series | 500gb Western Digital HDD | Antec Three Hundred Illusion Mid Tower |
STEAM ID: alex2143 (Toxic_Seahorse)
Currently Playing: Tales of Graces f (PS3),Metro: Last Light (PC), Persona 4 (Vita)
Get a 7950. It's the same price as the the 660ti and has more vram and a MUCH better memory bandwidth.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 22, 2012 2:06 am GMTCommunication using human language has the sole purpose of finding ways to program into the subroutines of people's minds the subliminal message of "How can I help you, help me?".
Zubin ✈====❇✈ Dead_Pilot
[QUOTE="Toxic-Seahorse"]Get a 7950. It's the same price as the the 660ti and has more vram and a MUCH better memory bandwidth.[/QUOTE] It's a steal with the massive price drop it got, I have two HD 6950s in crossfire on my old PC and they were also the best bang for their buck at the time.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 22, 2012 3:01 am GMT
+1 for the 7950. Most models also come with Sleeping Dogs if the included game matters.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 22, 2012 4:59 am GMT
RIG
Core i7 3770k//AMD Radeon 7970 3gb//4GB DDR3 1600 Corsair XMS3// Antec HCG 620 watt PSU// CoolerMaster HAF 922 Midtower Case// Acer 23 inch 1080p LCD monitor// 500 GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 rpm//60 GB OCZ Vertex II SSD
Now Playing: Sleeping Dogs, Farcry 3, Hitman Absolution, Starcraft 2
7870 and 660ti are pretty close performance wise. U can also get physx if u really want on radeon cards so no big deal.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 22, 2012 5:40 am GMT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel DX58SO
Intel Core i7 950 @ 4.0 GHz + Corsair A50
12GB RAM DDR3 @ 1033 MHz Triple Channel
EVGA GeForce GTX 560 1GB @ 940/1880/2230 MHz
OCZ StealthXStream 2 600W
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
7950 > 7870 > 660 Ti (price/performance)
If you find a 660 Ti for the same/close price as the 7870, I'd choose the 660 Ti.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 22, 2012 7:34 am GMT
i5-3570k@4.5ghz/CM Hyper 212+/Gigabyte Z77-D3H/8GB Corsair DDR3/Gigabyte GTX 560 Ti SOC 1GB/128GB Samsung 830 Series SSD/1 TB WD Caviar Black HDD/Creative X-FI Xtremegamer/DVD Burner+Blu-ray/CM 692 case/Acer H233H 23" 1080p/Panasonic TCP50-VT25 50" 3d Plasma TV/Klipsch Promedia 2.1/Antec Earthwatts 650 watt PSU/Vista X64
[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]
7870 and 660ti are pretty close performance wise. U can also get physx if u really want on radeon cards so no big deal.
[/QUOTE]
And how do you do that?
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 22, 2012 7:41 am GMT
I was trying to spend a max of $300 on GPU, but since the 7950 is around that price it seems like that might be the best decision here..
Still, I'm not sure if the extra cost is worth it. From the benchmarks I've seen the 7870 performs well on everything currently out. Also, I wasn't aware that it was possible to get physx on an AMD card?
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 22, 2012 7:43 am GMT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel DX58SO
Intel Core i7 950 @ 4.0 GHz + Corsair A50
12GB RAM DDR3 @ 1033 MHz Triple Channel
EVGA GeForce GTX 560 1GB @ 940/1880/2230 MHz
OCZ StealthXStream 2 600W
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[QUOTE="starwarsgeek112"]
I was trying to spend a max of $300 on GPU, but since the 7950 is around that price it seems like that might be the best decision here..
Still, I'm not sure if the extra cost is worth it. From the benchmarks I've seen the 7870 performs well on everything currently out. Also, I wasn't aware that it was possible to get physx on an AMD card?
[/QUOTE]The HD 7950 is in my opinion, currently, the best option out there when it comes to a graphics card.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 22, 2012 7:45 am GMTloosingENDS Wisdom:
My PC is not a gaming PC in the sense that does not have a GPU that will run games in playable frame rates, other than that is a DX11 GPU that will run any game in any setting
Was xbox 360 based on a 9800 pro of 2003 ?
No, it was based on a 8800GTX of 2006
[QUOTE="starwarsgeek112"]I was trying to spend a max of $300 on GPU, but since the 7950 is around that price it seems like that might be the best decision here..
Still, I'm not sure if the extra cost is worth it. From the benchmarks I've seen the 7870 performs well on everything currently out. Also, I wasn't aware that it was possible to get physx on an AMD card?
[/QUOTE] Its not possible on an AMD gpu. You still need a Nvidia gpu and hacked physx drivers which are always out of date. My point still stands a GTX 660ti is still slightly faster comes with Borderlands 2 , while a 7870 does not and you would still need to buy the game making the prices equal in the end.- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 22, 2012 7:46 am GMT
i5-3570k@4.5ghz/CM Hyper 212+/Gigabyte Z77-D3H/8GB Corsair DDR3/Gigabyte GTX 560 Ti SOC 1GB/128GB Samsung 830 Series SSD/1 TB WD Caviar Black HDD/Creative X-FI Xtremegamer/DVD Burner+Blu-ray/CM 692 case/Acer H233H 23" 1080p/Panasonic TCP50-VT25 50" 3d Plasma TV/Klipsch Promedia 2.1/Antec Earthwatts 650 watt PSU/Vista X64
[QUOTE="starwarsgeek112"]
I was trying to spend a max of $300 on GPU, but since the 7950 is around that price it seems like that might be the best decision here..
Still, I'm not sure if the extra cost is worth it. From the benchmarks I've seen the 7870 performs well on everything currently out. Also, I wasn't aware that it was possible to get physx on an AMD card?
[/QUOTE]
The 7950 is the best card out there in the $300 neighborhood. I recommend that anyone who is planning on spending anything over $250 on a GPU stretch it a bit and pay the extra to get it. It will pay off in the long run.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 22, 2012 7:55 am GMT
Well it looks like I'll have to go with the 7950 then..
Who needs physx anyways?
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 22, 2012 2:07 pm GMT
Just Relax..and take life one game at a time..C2Q9550 @ 3.6Ghz-Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 : Sapphire Radeon HD 6970 2GB : G.Skill 8GB (4x2GB) DDR2 1066 (PC28500) 5-5-5-15@2.1v : 2x WD Caviar 640GB HDD : COUGAR-SX850 850W 80 PLUS SILVER Certified Modular : Zalman CNPS9700 110mm CPU Cooler : Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro : Lian Li PC-K63 : HP LP2465 1920x1200 S-PVA Panel : Windows Vista Ultimate X64 w/SP-2
[QUOTE="starwarsgeek112"]
Well it looks like I'll have to go with the 7950 then..
Who needs physx anyways?
[/QUOTE]
Physx isn't really needed unless you are playing games that utilize it, but not very many do.
If you feel the need for have physx, I would just look for an inexpensive Nvidia card to handle that.
I agree with the 7950...in the $300 price range it's the best deal out there.
*+
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 22, 2012 3:45 pm GMTYeah the 7950 can't be ignored at these prices. It's a friggin beast once OC'd, at 1100mhz it should be as fast as the 7970ghz ed, or very near.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- Sep 22, 2012 8:37 pm GMT
PC specs:
ASRock Z68 Pro3 Gen3 motherboard
Intel i5 2500k
HIS IceQ HD 7950
[QUOTE="starwarsgeek112"]
Well it looks like I'll have to go with the 7950 then..
Who needs physx anyways?
[/QUOTE]
I agree with everyone else that the HD 7950 offers the best price to performance ratio right now. Honestly, all of these cards are pretty damn good for current games at 1920 x 1080 resolution, but the HD 7950 will likely be better for future games.
PhysX can still work even if you have an AMD card. It simply runs on your processor (cpu). I see that you are looking forward to Borderlands 2. Well, you will be happy to know that it runs very well on AMD cards...even if you enable PhysX. Have a look at this Borderlands 2 comparison that Techspot did:
http://www.techspot.com/review/577-borderlands-2-performance/page5.html

With PhysX set to 'high' the HD 7970 was actually faster than the GTX 680!
The HD 7950 is an amazing card. It will perform exceptionally well in Borderlands 2 with PhysX enabled and you will be very happy with it.
- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
- [QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]
[QUOTE="starwarsgeek112"]
I was trying to spend a max of $300 on GPU, but since the 7950 is around that price it seems like that might be the best decision here..
Still, I'm not sure if the extra cost is worth it. From the benchmarks I've seen the 7870 performs well on everything currently out. Also, I wasn't aware that it was possible to get physx on an AMD card?
[/QUOTE]
The 7950 is the best card out there in the $300 neighborhood. I recommend that anyone who is planning on spending anything over $250 on a GPU stretch it a bit and pay the extra to get it. It will pay off in the long run.
[/QUOTE] I wonder how 2 of those 7950s will run in Crossfire? Probably like a dream!- Please wait. Quick reply will be available shortly.
Forums
›
Computer Hardware Discussion
›
Radeon HD 7870 or gtx 660 ti?




