crysis on an hd 6850

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for h2owizard
h2owizard

1054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 h2owizard
Member since 2007 • 1054 Posts

im only getting around 25 to 30 fps on high-very high setting at 1680x1050 and only around 45-50 fps on low, what can i do to change this it seems like my video card should be able to play it with way more frames per second.

Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts
Seeing as how you just got that card, are your drivers up to date? Also those framrates don't actually look that far off. Your CPU is @2.4GHz right?
Avatar image for Zubinen
Zubinen

2555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Zubinen
Member since 2011 • 2555 Posts

CPU is bottlenecking and you're only using a single mid card so the FPS you're getting isn't low for the hardware you're using.

Avatar image for h2owizard
h2owizard

1054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 h2owizard
Member since 2007 • 1054 Posts
i updated my drivers and yes my cpu is at 2.4 gz
Avatar image for h2owizard
h2owizard

1054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 h2owizard
Member since 2007 • 1054 Posts
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150505
Avatar image for jedikevin2
jedikevin2

5263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#6 jedikevin2
Member since 2004 • 5263 Posts

Your CPU is a huge bottleneck for something like crysis 1.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

I used to have that same CPU. it bottlenecked just about every video card I threw at it

Avatar image for h2owizard
h2owizard

1054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 h2owizard
Member since 2007 • 1054 Posts
well im saving up for a quad core then
Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts
well im saving up for a quad core then h2owizard
Also a new MOBO and RAM. Don't sink any more money into 775.
Avatar image for M4Ntan
M4Ntan

1438

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 M4Ntan
Member since 2009 • 1438 Posts

[QUOTE="h2owizard"]well im saving up for a quad core then gmaster456
Also a new MOBO and RAM. Don't sink any more money into 775.

phenom is 120, ram is 30,am3+mobo is 60-100.

Avatar image for h2owizard
h2owizard

1054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 h2owizard
Member since 2007 • 1054 Posts
i knew i had to replace the mobo but i did not know it was necessary to replace the ram?
Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

Overclock it to 3.2 Ghz or higher and the video card will quickly become the bottleneck...

btw Crysis doesn't fully utilize four cores.

Avatar image for h2owizard
h2owizard

1054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 h2owizard
Member since 2007 • 1054 Posts

Overclock it to 3.2 Ghz or higher and the video card will quickly become the bottleneck...

btw Crysis doesn't fully utilize four cores.

Tezcatlipoca666
how many frames per second can you get? you have roughly the same videocard as me i think.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#14 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

Your CPU is a huge bottleneck for something like crysis 1.

jedikevin2

Not really. If he overclocks to 2.8-3.0ghz then the bottleneck will be the GPU again. Crysis isn't very CPU-intensive.

Avatar image for h2owizard
h2owizard

1054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 h2owizard
Member since 2007 • 1054 Posts
the hd 6850 is a pretty new card on the high end side is it not? also what graphics cards can max out crysis at 60 fps or higher? im talking about single gpus not sli or crossfire
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 blaznwiipspman1  Online
Member since 2007 • 16576 Posts

the hd 6850 is a pretty new card on the high end side is it not? also what graphics cards can max out crysis at 60 fps or higher? im talking about single gpus not sli or crossfireh2owizard

i believe only a 580 gtx at the moment. the 570 and 6970 come close. again this is with the latest core i7 cpu's

Avatar image for h2owizard
h2owizard

1054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 h2owizard
Member since 2007 • 1054 Posts
all this time its been out and its still hard for the average pc to run damn haha
Avatar image for theafiguy
theafiguy

962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#18 theafiguy
Member since 2006 • 962 Posts

the hd 6850 is a pretty new card on the high end side is it not? also what graphics cards can max out crysis at 60 fps or higher? im talking about single gpus not sli or crossfireh2owizard

The 6850 is a mid-range card, it's not really bad or good, it's just right there in the middle. The 6870 is slightly better, much better to OC. I'd say that the 570/580 would be able to get close to maxing out Crysis with 60 FPS, but there are other factors than just GPU.

Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

[QUOTE="Tezcatlipoca666"]

Overclock it to 3.2 Ghz or higher and the video card will quickly become the bottleneck...

btw Crysis doesn't fully utilize four cores.

h2owizard

how many frames per second can you get? you have roughly the same videocard as me i think.

I played through one of the levels for ya. I forget the name but it's the third or fourth.

Bench 1: Avg: 34.948 - Min: 19 - Max: 45

Bench 2: Avg: 33.477 - Min: 15 - Max: 53

That is all very high, 2xMSAA, 16xAF, and 1920x1080. HD 6850 overclocked to 950 Mhz.

Avatar image for h2owizard
h2owizard

1054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 h2owizard
Member since 2007 • 1054 Posts
see thats where i went wrong i thought that was a high end card when i bought it, but its all good because my budget was not very high at all and its a good step up from an 8800 gts 320mb
Avatar image for h2owizard
h2owizard

1054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 h2owizard
Member since 2007 • 1054 Posts

[QUOTE="h2owizard"][QUOTE="Tezcatlipoca666"]

Overclock it to 3.2 Ghz or higher and the video card will quickly become the bottleneck...

btw Crysis doesn't fully utilize four cores.

Tezcatlipoca666

how many frames per second can you get? you have roughly the same videocard as me i think.

I played through one of the levels for ya. I forget the name but it's the third or fourth.

Bench 1: Avg: 34.948 - Min: 19 - Max: 45

Bench 2: Avg: 33.477 - Min: 15 - Max: 53

That is all very high, 2xMSAA, 16xAF, and 1920x1080. HD 6850 overclocked to 950 Mhz.

very nice, so i see overclocking the gpu is does good. i have the xfx version though and i read a little while ago in another thread that xfx arent good overclocking cards they are good at their stock values.
Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

That's a strange claim honestly. I bet that you could at least achieve a 900 Mhz core and 1100 Mhz memory overclock as that doesn't require a voltage increase and barely increases load and idle temperatures.

I used to have an XFX HD 4770 and it overclocked like a beast. Like a 25% increase on the core clock with the stock voltage :P

Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts
I had some XFX cards and they ran hot as hell, if you have sub 60c idle temps then OC but if not be careful, my 4870s used to run at 80c idle ^_^
Avatar image for gravitygamer
gravitygamer

948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 gravitygamer
Member since 2010 • 948 Posts
all this time its been out and its still hard for the average pc to run damn hahah2owizard
at max the 6850 can handle light games are 1080p but for games like crysis you have to turn it down a notch..well im playing crysis only at 1366x768 with a 6850 and getting 45-50fps.so maybe you have lower your resolution.
Avatar image for h2owizard
h2owizard

1054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 h2owizard
Member since 2007 • 1054 Posts
okay gravity gamer i will try that, i always thought that you need to set it at the default resolution, you know the resolution that is the most pixels that your monitor can display
Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts
okay gravity gamer i will try that, i always thought that you need to set it at the default resolution, you know the resolution that is the most pixels that your monitor can displayh2owizard
Oviously that will look better, but resolution has a large effect on performance. You could always try 'high' instead of 'very high'. I personally don't feel it makes a big enough difference to justify the performance difference.
Avatar image for h2owizard
h2owizard

1054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 h2owizard
Member since 2007 • 1054 Posts
well Ive been messing around with it some more and i found out even when i play it on medium frame-rate still drops below thirty occasionally, i even saw it happen on low. this is really weird and im guessing its because the game is poorly optimized?
Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

Probably the physics maxing out your CPU. As I said earlier, it would run quite a lot better if you were to overclock to 3.0-3.2 Ghz or higher.

Avatar image for h2owizard
h2owizard

1054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 h2owizard
Member since 2007 • 1054 Posts
yeah tbh i can overclock my gpu fine but thats because its easy to do in the catalyst, im pretty sketchy about doing that to my cpu
Avatar image for LordsLoss
LordsLoss

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 LordsLoss
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

Here is a stock GTX 580 and an i7 920 processor. This only get's 50fps on 1920x1200.

http://www.geforce.com/#/Optimize/OPS/Crysis-GeForce-GTX-580-OPS

Avatar image for gravitygamer
gravitygamer

948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 gravitygamer
Member since 2010 • 948 Posts
yeah tbh i can overclock my gpu fine but thats because its easy to do in the catalyst, im pretty sketchy about doing that to my cpuh2owizard
just overclock your cpu from the BIOS...its easy..im running athlon x2 245 2.9GHz to 3.41GHz.i really see a difference.
Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#32 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts

[QUOTE="jedikevin2"]

Your CPU is a huge bottleneck for something like crysis 1.

hartsickdiscipl

Not really. If he overclocks to 2.8-3.0ghz then the bottleneck will be the GPU again. Crysis isn't very CPU-intensive.

for its time it was. and this really isn't a 'new' cpu :lol: i shouldnt laugh tho. my old cpu bottlenecked me at 30 frames at any setting.
Avatar image for kungfool69
kungfool69

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 kungfool69
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

see thats where i went wrong i thought that was a high end card when i bought it, but its all good because my budget was not very high at all and its a good step up from an 8800 gts 320mbh2owizard

i first played the game on a e6400 @ 2.2GHZ at the same res with a 8800GTS 640mb with 2GB of RAM. i new the system limits and set it to medium. had a great time.

Avatar image for ShadowDragon78
ShadowDragon78

371

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 ShadowDragon78
Member since 2011 • 371 Posts
I'd say try to get a better CPU as others have stated, it is bottlenecking your vid card...