Sign on Options
Theme: [Light Selected] To Dark»
ForumsPC & Mac Games › 7800 vs 8400

This forum is considered a sanctuary for PC and Mac Gamers. Anti-PC and Mac game discussions will be moderated as a type of forum invasion. Keep your discussions about the games and those who play them.

PC & Mac Forum Rules

- Read the Terms of Use and FAQ.
- Illegal activities not permitted; admitting/requesting piracy and defeating copy-protection will result in the removal of privileges.
- No hardware specific discussions allowed. Use the Computer Hardware forum.
- Platform comparison discussions belong in the System Wars forum.

7800 vs 8400

Forum Actions
  • Level 20
    Metal Slime
    Posts: 298
    Feb 28, 2008 12:22 pm GMT

    Which card is better for gaming and will run new games

    Nividia 7800 (512 MB)

    OR

    Nividia 8400 GS (512 MB)

    I think 8400 is best for gaming whats ur comments pls post here OK

    Which card is better for gaming and will run new games

    Nividia 7800 (512 MB)

    OR

    Nividia 8400 GS (512 MB)

    I think 8400 is best for gaming whats ur comments pls post here OK

  • Level 50
    Strawberry Candy
    Posts: 13142
    Feb 28, 2008 12:28 pm GMT
    The 7800 is considerably better. The 8400 is just a budget card of the 8 series. This belongs on the PC hardware forum, by the way. Be sure to take these topics there in the future.

    ---

    A Proud Jesus Freak
    -
    Gigabyte EP43-UD3L, Intel Core 2 Duo E8400, MSI GeForce GTX 260 OC'd @620/1296/2160MHz (core/shader/memory), 4GB Mushkin DDR2 800 5-4-4-12, Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer Fatal1ty Pro, PC Power and Cooling 610W +12V@49A, Raidmax Smilodon Mid Tower

    The 7800 is considerably better. The 8400 is just a budget card of the 8 series. This belongs on the PC hardware forum, by the way. Be sure to take these topics there in the future.
  • Level 37
    Heiankyo Alien
    Posts: 3490
    Feb 28, 2008 12:30 pm GMT

    Issue 1: This belongs in Hardware Forums.

    Issue 2: I'd say the 7800 is better.

    -------------------------------------------
    "I'm not a doctor, I'm a medic." --Doc
    "What's the difference?" --Church
    "Well, a doctor cures people. A medic makes them more comfortable...while they die." --Doc

    Issue 1: This belongs in Hardware Forums.

    Issue 2: I'd say the 7800 is better.

  • Level 13
    Toobin'
    Posts: 2237
    Feb 28, 2008 12:51 pm GMT
    An old 5800 is faster than the new 8400 GS. There is a big difference when it comes to high-end cards and budget cards.
    An old 5800 is faster than the new 8400 GS. There is a big difference when it comes to high-end cards and budget cards.
  • Level 13
    Toobin'
    Posts: 333
    Feb 28, 2008 1:04 pm GMT
    They number their products to give you a general idea of how powerful each card is. Just looking at this, the 7800 is weaker than the 8400 (it's 600 less).
    They number their products to give you a general idea of how powerful each card is. Just looking at this, the 7800 is weaker than the 8400 (it's 600 less).
  • Level 31
    Ippon!
    Posts: 3203
    Feb 28, 2008 1:06 pm GMT
    definetely 7800.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thinker_145 wrote:
    That xbit labs review falis cuz it's using high quality filtering and transperancy anti aliasing in all the benchmarks.You just cant do it that way.

    PC Specs: E6850, HD 2900XT, 2GB 6400 ram, antec 900 case, P35C-DS3R Motherboard,550 watt Thermaltake power supply, 500 GB harddrive and Vista Ultimate 64bit

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=3129025 3dmark06 score 12114

    definetely 7800.
  • Level 13
    Toobin'
    Posts: 2237
    Feb 28, 2008 1:10 pm GMT

    litewo wrote:
    They number their products to give you a general idea of how powerful each card is. Just looking at this, the 7800 is weaker than the 8400 (it's 600 less).

    LOLISMO

    [QUOTE="litewo"]They number their products to give you a general idea of how powerful each card is. Just looking at this, the 7800 is weaker than the 8400 (it's 600 less). [/QUOTE]

    LOLISMO

  • Level 50
    Strawberry Candy
    Posts: 13142
    Feb 28, 2008 1:14 pm GMT

    litewo wrote:
    They number their products to give you a general idea of how powerful each card is. Just looking at this, the 7800 is weaker than the 8400 (it's 600 less).

    No, you've got it wrong. That only applies provided the first digit is the same between the two cards compared. That digit signifies what series they're a part of, while the three numbers and the letters afterward dictate how powerful each of them are within that series. Each series has different high-end, mid-range, and budget cards. Budget cards never outperform the high-end cards of the previous series.

    Oh, and .

    Edited on Feb 28, 2008 1:38 pm GMT

    ---

    A Proud Jesus Freak
    -
    Gigabyte EP43-UD3L, Intel Core 2 Duo E8400, MSI GeForce GTX 260 OC'd @620/1296/2160MHz (core/shader/memory), 4GB Mushkin DDR2 800 5-4-4-12, Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer Fatal1ty Pro, PC Power and Cooling 610W +12V@49A, Raidmax Smilodon Mid Tower

    [QUOTE="litewo"]They number their products to give you a general idea of how powerful each card is. Just looking at this, the 7800 is weaker than the 8400 (it's 600 less). [/QUOTE]

    No, you've got it wrong. That only applies provided the first digit is the same between the two cards compared. That digit signifies what series they're a part of, while the three numbers and the letters afterward dictate how powerful each of them are within that series. Each series has different high-end, mid-range, and budget cards. Budget cards never outperform the high-end cards of the previous series.

    Oh, and :lol:.

  • Level 52
    Spoony Bard
    Posts: 18189
    Feb 28, 2008 1:31 pm GMT
    The 7800 card is much better... oh, and @litewo, spreading misinformation probably isn't a good idea...


    The 7800 card is much better... oh, and @litewo, spreading misinformation probably isn't a good idea...
Forum Actions
ForumsPC & Mac Games › 7800 vs 8400