Avatar image for geaux321
geaux321

19424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 geaux321
Member since 2003 • 19424 Posts

UCLA, Southern California, Arizona, Arizona State, Utah and Colorado

Stanford, California, Oregon, Oregon State, Washington and Washington State

Good or bad alignment?

Avatar image for deactivated-5b31d3729c1fa
deactivated-5b31d3729c1fa

11536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-5b31d3729c1fa
Member since 2007 • 11536 Posts
not bad, wouldnt mind to see boise state join this conference
Avatar image for spfx30
spfx30

9945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 spfx30
Member since 2005 • 9945 Posts
Despite USC's protests to the contrary, I believe the Pac-12 made the correct decision to align the teams in this manner. Any other alignment would have been offbalance and unfair.
Avatar image for GamerForca
GamerForca

7203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 78

User Lists: 0

#4 GamerForca
Member since 2005 • 7203 Posts
Stanford and Cal should be with the other Cali schools, so I agree with USC's complaints. Replace them with Utah and Colorado even if it unbalances the divisions. Stanford will only be good as long as Harbaugh is their coach anyway.
Avatar image for Put_in_Kitna
Put_in_Kitna

2765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Put_in_Kitna
Member since 2009 • 2765 Posts
Why is usc crying? They dont have to play cal, stanford, oregon and oregon state every year. Thos most consistent schools in pac-1 the last few years. Very balanced imo. Unlike the Big 12.