Level 25 and above too low?Toph_Girl250Definitely. Potential for abuse is way too high.
[QUOTE="Toph_Girl250"]Level 25 and above too low?silentexistenceDefinitely. Potential for abuse is way too high.Level 46 and above still too low?
Well, then obviously I think the feature only being available to users only on either levels 71 or 72 is even better. :P What feature we talking about here anyway?Toph_Girl250The users at those levels would already be able to use the feature since they're privileged users lol. We were talking about the ability to embed videos in your posts.
[QUOTE="Toph_Girl250"]Level 46 and above still too low?silentexistenceYes. Level 65 is perfect since you'd have to be here for years, implying you're a trusted member in some way and have been well behaved enough that you don't have many point losses, if at all.Then I would say if there are any members level 65 and above that have a vast amount of moderations, then they shouldn't qualify.
Then I would say if there are any members level 65 and above that have a vast amount of moderations, then they shouldn't qualify. Toph_Girl250I think "level 65 and above" and "vast amount of moderations" don't go together in the same sentence. :lol: It's impossible to get up there with so many moderations.
I wonder why?koolkat14Plenty of questions were coming in from normal users about how to do it. At that time they didn't even tell us we had the ability so we didn't know normal users didn't have the same privileges we did. I guess the nail in the coffin was the potential for abuse that embedding videos in posts presents.
Yeah. To be honest I think I would have shed a tear or two if I was one of the judges too.He was sincere enough and it came across to everyone there. What language is that? And I love the top comment. :lol:
Can you believe this voice comes from a guy?horgen123
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment