[QUOTE="Lansdowne5"][QUOTE="7guns"][QUOTE="Lansdowne5"]How am I playing with words??? I'm simply stating that I'm not the one who converts anyone. If I was, the person who ultimately converted wouldn't be the one making the decision, it would be me.
7guns
I get it. For someone to become christian one has to take an oath, touching the bible, before witnesses. Correct?:roll: . But he probably didn't come all this way just by himself. Once you have already convinced someone of the exixtence of god, there may not be much use of freewill.
FYI, we've been down this road in the past : LINK
Enough with the eyes. :shock:
For someone to become a Christian, that is a personal decision. Regardless of whether someone actually helps them to see the Truth of God, at the end of the day the person themself is wholly in control of what they do, or don't believe. To accept that God exists is exercising free will, to dismiss his existence is also using free will.
Once you throw an apple on someone's nose and make him eat it and then if he says apple doesn't exist and that he doesn't know what an apple is, would you you accept his answer? Or even better, will he ever say that in the first place?
But when you say that he can chose to not believe in god even after you show him to god, are you not acknowledging that god is not as real as an apple?
That's a very bizzare example. But anyway, where do you suppose we draw the line?
You could say something to someone, which might make them seriously consider their belief, even to the extent of them changing it. But is that 'you' converting them? What someone decides to follow is their choice. When they change what they follow, you can't pin that decision on anyone but the person. Regardless of what someone else has said to them, the ultimate decision is theirs.
Log in to comment