@tormentos said:
@ronvalencia said:
1. Discrete R7-265 ~= PS4. Stop being a hypocrite.
2. Fusion links. Stop being a hypocrite.
3. Vega's tiling+binning+cache raster improvements reduces external memory bandwidth usage.
4. Doing more with less hardware = more efficient. Throwing more functional units at the problem is the brute force approach. RYZEN is mostly "throwing more functional units at the problem = the brute force approach".
At 28 nm, RYZEN CPU core chip area size would be around 6 to 8 mm^2 while Jaguar is only 3.1 mm^2.
RYZEN CPU is a big core CPU relative to Jaguar.
I gave Scorpio two options and these are Bristol Ridge's Excavator and Raven Ridge's RYZEN.
Eat it.
AMD Athlon X4 845 (Bristol Ridge, 65 watts with IGP, 28 nm process tech) runs Alien Isolation greater than 60 fps i.e. 103 fps.
5. http://en.yibada.com/articles/182451/20161231/amd-ryzen-amd-ryzen-price-specs-ryzen-processor-amd-cpu.htm
RYZEN SR3 (quad/8 threads) with desktop clock speed starts around $149. SR3 is just 8 cores chip with 4 cores disabled.
SR7 $249 refers to +3 Ghz variant and ~93 watts. Scorpio's CPU has to be around 30 to 50 watt TDP budget hence it's laptop clock speed.
Try again clown.
1-Who the fu** is talking about the PS4 and the R265? << Irrefutable proof that you are a moron who argue things no one is arguing.
2-LINK me to AMD or MS claiming that Ryzen is on xbox one and in full PC form without any downgrades.
3-No having 8 cores vs 8 core and doing much more still is more efficient you MORON,you are doing far more with equal amount of cores,just like it would be with less core,the argument is the same the problem here is that you want to bring the POWERFUL word into the equation because well you are a MS ass kisser,as well as a MS suck up.
Ryzen 8 cores is $249 and is 95 watts DEAL WITH IT.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/3149051/components/amd-offers-more-proof-that-zen-now-renamed-ryzen-is-its-best-chip-in-a-decade.html
Is to much for a 6TF APU dude,so yeah a water down version i am sure is what it will have which is OK since even a water down version would piss on the Jaguar the xbox one and PS4 Pro have.
But you have to stop picturing the best case scenario here,reality is even a laptop Ryzen would probably be to much for that APU because of the GPU inside it.
4-This is what shock me the most how fu**ing selective you are,65 watts still to high for scorpio let me REMIND YOU that the Jaguar inside the xbox and PS4 was like 25 watts,we are talking here about more than double the watts,this gen console are a total departure from what the PS3 era consoles were very power hungry.
Great Alien Isolation runs 89 FPS on a damn G1920 cheap ass CPU,is no a damn CPU intensive game at all.
5- I know which is why i am telling you it is not a full Ryzen CPU because the PC version is 95 watts and $249 dollars,the Scorpio version would probably a cut down version,probably a Jaguar equivalent inside the Ryzen family,not a Full PC version just slower clock,because a full version lower clocked still is a full version and still cost the same to manufacture fool.
Now stop arguing shit no one is,i am not down playing scorpio here,A ryzen version for Scorpio should give way more even in water down form than the Jaguar consoles use now.
PS. 320GB/s is for the whole system stop damage controlling which is great for a 6TF system.
Against your MORONIC points
1. Against your "320GB/s is for the whole system stop damage controlling which is great for a 6TF system", Stop being a hypocrite.
The point you miss is the principle for PC's discrete R7-265 having similar results as PS4 (Ref 1) is the same for Scorpio. It proves you are a hypocrite i.e. you applied different standards for PS4 and non-Sony branded hardware. The MORON is YOU.
Scorpio's hardware is just a scaled up PS4 Pro and PS4 and it's not like XBO with it's 32 MB ESRAM.
Reference
Ref 1. http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2016-we-built-a-pc-with-playstation-neo-gpu-tech
Your moronic argument haven't factored in PCI-E version 3.0 16X connection with 16 GB/s read and 16 GB write comes from the CPU side which can consume parts of GPU's memory bandwidth e.g. swapping textures from main memory to GPU memory. R7-265 comes with either 2 to 4 GB of VRAM.
PS4 and XBO's CPU L2 cache is just 4MB or 2 MB per quad core module. Intel Core i7-4790K has 8 MB of L3 cache with higher memory bandwidth than Jaguar's L2 cache! My point, larger cache = less system memory access. Most optimised XBO and PS4 games are designed around Jaguar's 4 MB cache size. This is X86 optimization 101.
For gaming workloads, my Intel Core i7-4790K at 4.5 Ghz with dual channel DDR3-2133Mhz memory modules (with 33 GB/s memory bandwidth) still delivers near top performance as any recent Intel Core i7-6770K with DDR4 memory. My CPU's 33 GB/s memory bandwidth is matched by PCI-E version 3.0 16X's 16 GB/s read and 16 GB/s write. Memory bandwidth higher 33 GB/s would be pointless since PCI-E version 3.0 16X's 16 GB/s read and 16 GB/s write is a bottleneck. With that being said, my gaming PCs are still superior to any PS4/PS4 Pro box.
My point, Intel Core i7-4790K currently being wasted on game console ports with last gen gameplay logics.
Intel Core i7-4790K with 8 threads and 4.5 Ghz clock speed acts like 2.2 Ghz 8 core Haswell without SMT. Scorpio's small Vega 11 like solution doesn't need a CPU that reaches Intel Core i7-6900K levels i.e. RYZEN SR3 (4 core/8 threads) at 4 Ghz or RYZEN 8 cores at 2 Ghz would do superior job over PS4 Pro.
XBO/PS4 has Onion fusion links to reduce main memory access i.e. direct links between CPU and GPU.
2. Any RYZEN downgrades are still superior to Jaguar. L3 cache less 8 core RYZEN still has 4 MB of L2 cache (512 MB x 8 cores) which is faster than Jaguar's L2 cache.
Intel Xeon level large L3 cache doesn't benefit XBO/PS4 CPU codebase i.e. if a game is designed for XBO/PS4's CPU 4 Mb cache size, the downgraded L3 cache less RYZEN will still runs at full compute speed. XBO/PS4 is not f.ucking running a large Oracle database (CPU side workload)!!!
For the original Xbox1 gaming, downgraded L2 cache K7 Duron still has most of K7 Athlon's gaming capabilities.
3. Wrong. my arguments remained the same since brute force Digital Alpha EV6 while Sony clowns played with lightweight MIPS CPUs. This is nothing to do with sucking up with MS.
Throwing more hardware at a compute problem is the brute force method.
Again, Intel Core i7-4790K with 8 threads and 4.5 Ghz clock speed acts like 2.2 Ghz 8 core Haswell without SMT. RYZEN acts like Intel Haswell/Broadwell like CPU core.
4. IGP less AMD GX-416RA (1.6 Ghz quad cores) has 15 watts TDP and PS4 has 2X the CPU modules, hence it's about 30 watts. XBO version runs at slightly higher clock speed with slightly higher TDP e.g. 35 to 40 watts.
Desktop AMD A12-9800 Bristol Ridge APU has 65 watts TDP which includes 8 CU IGP and it's similar to Radeon HD 7750 with GCN 1.2 updates.
Swap out AMD A12-9800 Bristol Ridge's IGP with another two Excavator modules and let say 65 watts remains.
Apply 14 nm/16nm FinFET improvements on 28 nm 65 watts part, hence 32 to 40 watts.
Phil Spenser wanted a CPU solution faster than PS4 Pro's 8 core FinFET improved Puma at 2.1 Ghz.
Athlon 5150 quad core Puma at 2.3 Ghz bottlenecks Doom Vulkan with R9-390 level GPU.
Log in to comment