@djexertive said:
Having played both the PS4 and X1, I have this to say:
The graphics of both are pretty much the same and are not much better than the graphics of later xbox 360 games like GTA V.
The X1 is a multimedia device and is quite unique in that regard. The PS4 is not.
The controller of the PS4 is as BAD as the rest of the playstation controllers. The sticks are too loose and are placed in the same awkward parallel position: this makes it almost impossible to play first person shooting games with the level of accuracy you have on xbox controllers.
The PS4 is simply the PS3 with marginally better graphics. PC graphics of 3-4 years ago are better/same than both systems.
The PS controller only started magically becoming bad after the the 360 came out. No one ever thought it was bad by any stretch of imagination during the PS1 and PS2 days. Nobody even complained about it. But just because the 360 controller was better, it doesn't make the PS one bad. It's like drinking regular coffee for most of your life and never had an issue with it until you started buying expensive coffee. IMO, if something doesn't immediately feel bad until you have something better to compare it to, then it's not actually bad. Your standards have just gone up.
And it's funny that your post was written to downplay the importance of whatever the PS4 is better at, and up-play the things the X1 is better at. Kinda like 'cognitive dissonance'. But anyway, out of all the things related to gaming, which could be better - games, graphics, experience etc., you instead chose to glorify multimedia and the physical controller itself. If those are your priorities in deciding which game machine to buy, you might wanna consider the gadget industry instead. That's where the product features and physical aesthetics matter the most.
Log in to comment