Why does no one give a shit about Insurgency 2?

I played it. Quite gud.

please watch language, there are 3ds owners in here

Because it is a FPS and as a PC gamer, I grew tired of FPS back in 2005-2006.

Because there isn't much to the game.....

Isn't it just called insurgency now?

It's a sequel to a mod. But this is the first retail release as a stand alone game. I don't know. probably.

I mean on steam. It is listed just as insurgency

Never heard of it.

It's counterstrike mixed with Rainbow 6 (the good ones not the shitty third person gears of war video games) . Basically.

So far it is very, alright. For a video game.

It actually looks like shit when compared to the mod.

I don't play mods, this isn't 1999.

mod was the golden days of it, now most people dont care

Because people don't like bad games

My friend, nowdays the young people only play Call Of Duty. It does not require skill, patience or learning curve. Like peanuts being thrown at a monkey the player is given MMO like rewards even if they fail. Spamming the young people with unlocks and XP. This (like Red Orchestra 2) is skill based game designed specifically for men who understand the nature of war.

@uninspiredcup: you understand the nature of war, eh? Gonna go out and fight in the Middle East, big macho man?

I was in the Falkland War. Middle East isn't even a proper war. They have inferior equipment.

@uninspiredcup: Lol I was half expecting you to say you fought in Korea or some shit. You're clearly too masculine for consolites to understand.

I am going to assume that all the people that want this game already got it via Early Access

No you didn't. Falkland island wars last 2 months and was in 1982 off the coast of argentina. That means youd have to be at least a minimum of 52 years old and I highly doubt that because you argue and just make up ridiculous stories like a 12 year old. No 52 year old is stupid enough to spell good as gud.

And no one cares about insurgency 2 because it looks like a shit title.

Because it's a small game that caters to the fans of the original mod. It will be alright, I plan on playing it, but it's niche.

Also you weren't in Falklands War. Hell it sounds like you know nothing about the Falklands War. A veteran of the Falklands war would not be a persistent troll on System Wars, they would have a family and a lot better things to do with their time.

@Gargus: He's a hell of a troll isn't he?

He tries.

The problem is that trolling is a art.

@Wasdie: So just a question... Is it not possible to ban users anymore? Because this guy... Well, he's annoying simply because of how persistent he is.

Can't ban somebody for being annoying.

has nothing to do with what I said, but then again, youre a band dodging troll anyways, so...oh well

@Wasdie: He's not just annoying he's smug, arrogant and a bit of a ****. Make an exception!

Haha.

You guys say that stuff, but SW without trolls would be a terribly boring place. Somebody has to stir the pot.

My friend, I have nothing to prove to you or anyone. As a former war vet (who use to live in Burma as a smithy) Insurgency 2 should be applauded, much like Red Orchestra 2 for making the player seem like a cog in the machine rather than some Rambo like figure.

It's a very strange and odd argument to say no one cares when millions upon millions of you young people run out and buy Call Of Duty for it's rehashed multiplayer that requires no skill, has a single player noone cares about and is priced around 4-5 times the price of Insurgency 2. Frankly, son, I find your argument to be self enforced ignorance. The worst kind.

@uninspiredcup:

So tell me about your sexual exploits, old man.

there's trolling, then there's System Wars "I'm gonna act like I have the IQ of a head of lettuce and roll my face on my keyboard" trolling

And I fought in the in the battle of coruscant.

Yuck. Do not want.

Please do not bump old topics.

In the future please stick to the topic at hand to discuss. Maybe use different facts and opinions to back your arguments up and to debate.

Thank you.