Why Cant PS3 Fans Admit the 360 has a better game library? (Proof inside)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#251 Posted by HaloPimp978 (7249 posts) -

Opinions are opinions and recently PS3 has been doing better than 360. This is someone who owns both but to me you sound so fanboyish

#252 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="lild1425"]

Game21, your MS fanboyism is outrageous. Like I've pointed out in the past 20+ pages, your logic is hilarious.

Also, as we've said a million times, The TCs "numbers" aren't right.

StaticOnTV

Saying the 360 has more high rated games than the PS3 (at least according to Metacritic) isn't fanboyism, it's fact. Just because you guys are in denial about it doesn't change the truth.

But if the TC's numbers are wrong, where's your proof?

EDIT: I like how you didn't even try to dispute my post too. Typical, but still amusing.

I still think you guys should remove the 360 and PS3 fanboy sites and only include actual journalists reviews.

That is way too much work for 1000 or more games.

#253 Posted by lild1425 (6757 posts) -

[QUOTE="lild1425"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] You guys keep repeating the same thing over and over. "The PS3 has exclusives". You fail to realize when people purchase a game console they look at overall game library, and the 360 has the better overall game library according to critics. When you buy a 360 you get 617 games with high ratings, when you buy a PS3 you get 496 games with high ratings. Thats the bottom line. Hiding behind the fact that some of these games can be played on a PC (which is not even in competion with the 360) is ridiculous and a poor attempt to discredit the 360 library, especially when those games arent playable on the PS3.Miketheman83

You understand what the word exclusive means right?

If it isn't exclusive than it means that the 360 and PS3 both already have it and the scores are the same or about the same therefore leaving exclusives the deciding factor.

Are you like 4 years old? If you want me to explain it with legos and lincoln logs, I can do that as well.

Half my library is 360 and even I will admit this topic's claims are asinine.

You realize that there are a ton of games on the 360/PC that the PS3 doesnt get right? They are a HUGE advantage for the 360 and great games the PS3 misses out on. Games like Left 4 Dead 1 and 2. Mass Effect, Alan Wake, Splinter Cell Conviction, Witcher 2 etc. How do you think the 360 has hundreds more games with high rating? Because of 360 exclusives and 360/PC multiplats THAT ARE NOT ON THE PS3.

I had written a paragraph explaining this awesome logic, but this is too good. You clearly don't understand how the two systems both have exclusives. I could just about switch around 360 and PS3 in your statement and it would be correct. I already did it for you....

You realize that there are a ton of games on the PS3 that the 360 doesnt get right? They are a HUGE advantage for the PS3 and great games the 360 misses out on. Games like Uncharted, Ratchet and Clank, Little Big Planet. How do you think the PS3 has hundreds more games with high rating? Because of PS3 exclusives and PS3 multiplats THAT ARE NOT ON THE 360.

It's past your bedtime. Kindergarten comes early. I am seriously disgusted by the MS forumites today.

#254 Posted by Miketheman83 (3156 posts) -

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="lild1425"]

You understand what the word exclusive means right?

If it isn't exclusive than it means that the 360 and PS3 both already have it and the scores are the same or about the same therefore leaving exclusives the deciding factor.

Are you like 4 years old? If you want me to explain it with legos and lincoln logs, I can do that as well.

Half my library is 360 and even I will admit this topic's claims are asinine.

lild1425

You realize that there are a ton of games on the 360/PC that the PS3 doesnt get right? They are a HUGE advantage for the 360 and great games the PS3 misses out on. Games like Left 4 Dead 1 and 2. Mass Effect, Alan Wake, Splinter Cell Conviction, Witcher 2 etc. How do you think the 360 has hundreds more games with high rating? Because of 360 exclusives and 360/PC multiplats THAT ARE NOT ON THE PS3.

I had written a paragraph explaining this awesome logic, but this is too good. You clearly don't understand how the two systems both have exclusives. I could just about switch around 360 and PS3 in your statement and it would be correct. I already did it for you....

You realize that there are a ton of games on the PS3 that the 360 doesnt get right? They are a HUGE advantage for the PS3 and great games the 360 misses out on. Games like Uncharted, Ratchet and Clank, Little Big Planet. How do you think the PS3 has hundreds more games with high rating? Because of PS3 exclusives and PS3 multiplats THAT ARE NOT ON THE 360.

It's past your bedtime. Kindergarten comes early. I am seriously disgusted by the MS forumites today.

Your posts are barely making sense, nevermind your points that I cant even make out because they are so poorly written. Give me a reason why the information in the original post isnt credible.
#255 Posted by lild1425 (6757 posts) -

[QUOTE="StaticOnTV"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Saying the 360 has more high rated games than the PS3 (at least according to Metacritic) isn't fanboyism, it's fact. Just because you guys are in denial about it doesn't change the truth.

But if the TC's numbers are wrong, where's your proof?

EDIT: I like how you didn't even try to dispute my post too. Typical, but still amusing.

The_Game21x

I still think you guys should remove the 360 and PS3 fanboy sites and only include actual journalists reviews.

That is way too much work for 1000 or more games.

Guilty until proven innocent. TC provides numbers with no source work. You can't throw a claim with no link and tell me that I have to prove otherwise.

Trying to point you and Mike's horrible logic takes time. There have been some good posts in favor of the TC, but yours keep hammering on "facts" and "what the TC says", which pretty much everyone posting on this topic has disproven.

In fact, reading this long list of posts anyone that has both says how ridiculous this claim this.

#256 Posted by chessmaster1989 (29056 posts) -
Hey Mike, why don't you annualize the numbers, since the Xbox360 has been out for a year and a half longer? When you annualize them, it becomes: 360 90 or higher - 6.7 360 80 or higher - 42.3 360 75 or higher - 33.1 PS3 90 or higher - 7.5 PS3 80 or higher - 46.5 PS3 75 or higher - 28.7 So the PS3 actually wins in 80+ and 90+.
#257 Posted by lild1425 (6757 posts) -

[QUOTE="lild1425"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] You realize that there are a ton of games on the 360/PC that the PS3 doesnt get right? They are a HUGE advantage for the 360 and great games the PS3 misses out on. Games like Left 4 Dead 1 and 2. Mass Effect, Alan Wake, Splinter Cell Conviction, Witcher 2 etc. How do you think the 360 has hundreds more games with high rating? Because of 360 exclusives and 360/PC multiplats THAT ARE NOT ON THE PS3.Miketheman83

I had written a paragraph explaining this awesome logic, but this is too good. You clearly don't understand how the two systems both have exclusives. I could just about switch around 360 and PS3 in your statement and it would be correct. I already did it for you....

You realize that there are a ton of games on the PS3 that the 360 doesnt get right? They are a HUGE advantage for the PS3 and great games the 360 misses out on. Games like Uncharted, Ratchet and Clank, Little Big Planet. How do you think the PS3 has hundreds more games with high rating? Because of PS3 exclusives and PS3 multiplats THAT ARE NOT ON THE 360.

It's past your bedtime. Kindergarten comes early. I am seriously disgusted by the MS forumites today.

Your posts are barely making sense, nevermind your points that I cant even make out because they are so poorly written. Give me a reason why the information in the original post isnt credible.

.................Jesus Christ. I have zero faith in humanity anymore.

#258 Posted by hardmicro (622 posts) -
The PS3 has 3 exclusives which are HIGHER RATED then ANY Gears,Halo, or Forza game *Uncharted 2: Among Thieves - 96.46% LittleBigPlanet - 94.67% Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots - 93.56% *Are all higher rated then any of the following *Halo 3 - 93.53% Gears of War 2 - 93.32% Forza Motorsport 3 - 92.13% Halo Reach - 91.71% Gears of War 3 - 91.32% Halo Reach - 91.71% Gears of War 3 - 91.32% Forza Motorsport 4 - 90.50% Gorza Motorsport 2 - 89.85% *And its funny how only Gears/Halo/Forza sequels make up every 360 exclusive that has ever scored a 90 or higher. *Where as if you look at all the PS3 exclusives, which are rated 90 or higher,YOU SEE FAR more variety and diversity throughout *1. Uncharted 2: Among Thieves - 96.46% 2. LittleBigPlanet - 94.67% 3. Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots - 93.56% 4. LittleBigPlanet 2 - 92.20% 5. God of War III - 92.01% 6. The ICO and Shadow of the Colossus Collection - 91.99% 7. Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception - 91.96% 8. MLB 10: The Show - 90.53% 9. God of War Collection - 90.51% 10. Killzone 2 - 90.32% 11. MLB 11: The Show - 90.03% AND not only that, **The PS3 has MORE 90+ or higher rated exclusives then the 360 has *In fact, the PS3 has FIVE more to be exact, WHICH is significant. *As we saw the PS3's list already *1. Uncharted 2: Among Thieves - 96.46% 2. LittleBigPlanet - 94.67% 3. Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots - 93.56% 4. LittleBigPlanet 2 - 92.20% 5. God of War III - 92.01% 6. The ICO and Shadow of the Colossus Collection - 91.99% 7. Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception - 91.96% 8. MLB 10: The Show - 90.53% 9. God of War Collection - 90.51% 10. Killzone 2 - 90.32% 11. MLB 11: The Show - 90.03% *compared to only.... 1. Halo 3 - 93.53% 2. Gears of War 2 - 93.32% 3. Forza Motorsport 3 - 92.13% 4. Halo Reach - 91.71% 5. Gears of War 3 - 91.32% 6. Forza Motorsport 4 - 90.50% And thats all just Gears/Halo/Forza titles too LOL! Now, ask yourself as a true gamer, which line up you would rather have? The one with more quality, higher quality titles, and more diversity through out... OR the one with just lower scoring Gears/Halo/Forza titles, and repetitive sequels of? The reasonable choice would be for the PS3! But wait, why am i even asking, Staticontv, the_game11x, and miketheman83 are deluded xbots, and the fact they conitue to write what they do in the fact of all the evidence proves how irrational they are, and incapable they are of grasping reality. *No matter, which way you cut it, the PS3 has more quality exclusives, and higher quality exclusives, THEN anything the 360 has to offer, while the PS3 also offers far more variety, then the 360 has to offer. Not to mention that, *The PS3 has 3 exclusives which sell equal to or better then nearly EVERY 360 exclusive beside Halo. In fact, Halo is the only game that sells exceptionally well on the 360. I guess 360 fanboys only know how to do two things, that's troll, and gobble up only mindles shooters on the xbox. All in all, those 3 xbots fail in typical M$ fashion. The_game21x, Staicontv, miketheman83, take your ignorant, stupid, and WRONG opinions else where. IF we can even call what you three have an opinion,LOL xbots
#259 Posted by Speedzilla (1756 posts) -

TC made a fool out of himself :lol:

#260 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

Hey Mike, why don't you annualize the numbers, since the Xbox360 has been out for a year and a half longer? When you annualize them, it becomes: 360 90 or higher - 6.7 360 80 or higher - 42.3 360 75 or higher - 33.1 PS3 90 or higher - 7.5 PS3 80 or higher - 46.5 PS3 75 or higher - 28.7 So the PS3 actually wins in 80+ and 90+.chessmaster1989

How is it fair to throw out games from the 360's launch just because it launched earlier than the PS3? :?

#261 Posted by YoshiYogurt (5973 posts) -

I keep hearing that but I really see no games on the x360. Where the hell are they?

mind = blown

Vatusus
I know right? They scream "Der R Gamez" Where are they? Bought this POS 360 in 2008 or so and I have seen no good exclusives come out of it besides Halo and Gears. I'm constantly missing cool ps3 games like Metal Gear, heavy rain, Ni No Kuni, and soon to be The Last of Us. Lems feel like they MUST defend the wasted money on live and broken 360s, while I KNOW I made a bad purchase...
#262 Posted by lild1425 (6757 posts) -

Hey Mike, why don't you annualize the numbers, since the Xbox360 has been out for a year and a half longer? When you annualize them, it becomes: 360 90 or higher - 6.7 360 80 or higher - 42.3 360 75 or higher - 33.1 PS3 90 or higher - 7.5 PS3 80 or higher - 46.5 PS3 75 or higher - 28.7 So the PS3 actually wins in 80+ and 90+.chessmaster1989

Brace Yourselves. Game21 aka the "fact" Nazi is coming.

#263 Posted by StaticOnTV (583 posts) -

[QUOTE="StaticOnTV"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

Saying the 360 has more high rated games than the PS3 (at least according to Metacritic) isn't fanboyism, it's fact. Just because you guys are in denial about it doesn't change the truth.

But if the TC's numbers are wrong, where's your proof?

EDIT: I like how you didn't even try to dispute my post too. Typical, but still amusing.

The_Game21x

I still think you guys should remove the 360 and PS3 fanboy sites and only include actual journalists reviews.

That is way too much work for 1000 or more games.

A lot of them post on the large portions of games, once you find one with them, you can look up what reviews MC accepted from them and ignore them all on one page.
#264 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="StaticOnTV"] I still think you guys should remove the 360 and PS3 fanboy sites and only include actual journalists reviews.lild1425

That is way too much work for 1000 or more games.

Guilty until proven innocent. TC provides numbers with no source work. You can't throw a claim with no link and tell me that I have to prove otherwise.

Trying to point you and Mike's horrible logic takes time. There have been some good posts in favor of the TC, but yours keep hammering on "facts" and "what the TC says", which pretty much everyone posting on this topic has disproven.

In fact, reading this long list of posts anyone that has both says how ridiculous this claim this.

Okay, if it's been disproven, show me. Debating 101. If you're claiming the TC's numbers are innaccurate, you have to back it up with proof. So let's see it.

And I have all three consoles from last gen and a pretty good gaming rig and I like the 360 better than the PS3.

But how dare I or anyone else have a difference of opinion from PS3 fanboys such as yourself!

#265 Posted by Miketheman83 (3156 posts) -

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="lild1425"]

I had written a paragraph explaining this awesome logic, but this is too good. You clearly don't understand how the two systems both have exclusives. I could just about switch around 360 and PS3 in your statement and it would be correct. I already did it for you....

You realize that there are a ton of games on the PS3 that the 360 doesnt get right? They are a HUGE advantage for the PS3 and great games the 360 misses out on. Games like Uncharted, Ratchet and Clank, Little Big Planet. How do you think the PS3 has hundreds more games with high rating? Because of PS3 exclusives and PS3 multiplats THAT ARE NOT ON THE 360.

It's past your bedtime. Kindergarten comes early. I am seriously disgusted by the MS forumites today.

lild1425

Your posts are barely making sense, nevermind your points that I cant even make out because they are so poorly written. Give me a reason why the information in the original post isnt credible.

.................Jesus Christ. I have zero faith in humanity anymore.

I havent seen one point you made that would discredit the original post. I asking you, give me one. You dont have one. The original post is fact and cannot be disputed. Move on to another thread I feel like Im having a debate with an 8 year old.

#266 Posted by Blaz3_fox (174 posts) -

The Wii was the ps2 of this generation. Other than that, seems mostly right.

#267 Posted by Speedzilla (1756 posts) -

TC made a fool out of himself :lol:

Speedzilla

Agreed 100%

#268 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Hey Mike, why don't you annualize the numbers, since the Xbox360 has been out for a year and a half longer? When you annualize them, it becomes: 360 90 or higher - 6.7 360 80 or higher - 42.3 360 75 or higher - 33.1 PS3 90 or higher - 7.5 PS3 80 or higher - 46.5 PS3 75 or higher - 28.7 So the PS3 actually wins in 80+ and 90+.lild1425

Brace Yourselves. Game21 aka the "fact" Nazi is coming.

Already...arrived.

And feel free to actually prove me wrong with facts rather than your fanboy nonsense. Any time now. :)

#269 Posted by lild1425 (6757 posts) -

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Hey Mike, why don't you annualize the numbers, since the Xbox360 has been out for a year and a half longer? When you annualize them, it becomes: 360 90 or higher - 6.7 360 80 or higher - 42.3 360 75 or higher - 33.1 PS3 90 or higher - 7.5 PS3 80 or higher - 46.5 PS3 75 or higher - 28.7 So the PS3 actually wins in 80+ and 90+.The_Game21x

How is it fair to throw out games from the 360's launch just because it launched earlier than the PS3? :?

I don't think you understand what that calculation is. Nothing is 'thrown out'.

Like I've said a million times....numbers and statistics can be manipulated to fit any agenda. Anyone that has passed 8th grade can tell you this.

#270 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

I keep hearing that but I really see no games on the x360. Where the hell are they?

mind = blown

YoshiYogurt

I know right? They scream "Der R Gamez" Where are they? Bought this POS 360 in 2008 or so and I have seen no good exclusives come out of it besides Halo and Gears. I'm constantly missing cool ps3 games like Metal Gear, heavy rain, Ni No Kuni, and soon to be The Last of Us. Lems feel like they MUST defend the wasted money on live and broken 360s, while I KNOW I made a bad purchase...

Denying the fact that the 360 has more games doesn't change the fact that it still has more game. Adorable.

But I guess denial is all you guys have.

#271 Posted by Miketheman83 (3156 posts) -

[QUOTE="Speedzilla"]

TC made a fool out of himself :lol:

Speedzilla

Agreed 100%

I gave you guys a post with factual information. So far the only argument PS3 fans have is "um, um the TC is an idiot he got owned". You guys are morons, seriously.
#272 Posted by StaticOnTV (583 posts) -
[QUOTE="hardmicro"]The PS3 has 3 exclusives which are HIGHER RATED then ANY Gears,Halo, or Forza game *Uncharted 2: Among Thieves - 96.46% LittleBigPlanet - 94.67% Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots - 93.56% *Are all higher rated then any of the following *Halo 3 - 93.53% Gears of War 2 - 93.32% Forza Motorsport 3 - 92.13% Halo Reach - 91.71% Gears of War 3 - 91.32% Halo Reach - 91.71% Gears of War 3 - 91.32% Forza Motorsport 4 - 90.50% Gorza Motorsport 2 - 89.85% *And its funny how only Gears/Halo/Forza sequels make up every 360 exclusive that has ever scored a 90 or higher. *Where as if you look at all the PS3 exclusives, which are rated 90 or higher,YOU SEE FAR more variety and diversity throughout *1. Uncharted 2: Among Thieves - 96.46% 2. LittleBigPlanet - 94.67% 3. Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots - 93.56% 4. LittleBigPlanet 2 - 92.20% 5. God of War III - 92.01% 6. The ICO and Shadow of the Colossus Collection - 91.99% 7. Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception - 91.96% 8. MLB 10: The Show - 90.53% 9. God of War Collection - 90.51% 10. Killzone 2 - 90.32% 11. MLB 11: The Show - 90.03% AND not only that, **The PS3 has MORE 90+ or higher rated exclusives then the 360 has *In fact, the PS3 has FIVE more to be exact, WHICH is significant. *As we saw the PS3's list already *1. Uncharted 2: Among Thieves - 96.46% 2. LittleBigPlanet - 94.67% 3. Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots - 93.56% 4. LittleBigPlanet 2 - 92.20% 5. God of War III - 92.01% 6. The ICO and Shadow of the Colossus Collection - 91.99% 7. Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception - 91.96% 8. MLB 10: The Show - 90.53% 9. God of War Collection - 90.51% 10. Killzone 2 - 90.32% 11. MLB 11: The Show - 90.03% *compared to only.... 1. Halo 3 - 93.53% 2. Gears of War 2 - 93.32% 3. Forza Motorsport 3 - 92.13% 4. Halo Reach - 91.71% 5. Gears of War 3 - 91.32% 6. Forza Motorsport 4 - 90.50% And thats all just Gears/Halo/Forza titles too LOL! Now, ask yourself as a true gamer, which line up you would rather have? The one with more quality, higher quality titles, and more diversity through out... OR the one with just lower scoring Gears/Halo/Forza titles, and repetitive sequels of? The reasonable choice would be for the PS3! But wait, why am i even asking, Staticontv, the_game11x, and miketheman83 are deluded xbots, and the fact they conitue to write what they do in the fact of all the evidence proves how irrational they are, and incapable they are of grasping reality. *No matter, which way you cut it, the PS3 has more quality exclusives, and higher quality exclusives, THEN anything the 360 has to offer, while the PS3 also offers far more variety, then the 360 has to offer. Not to mention that, *The PS3 has 3 exclusives which sell equal to or better then nearly EVERY 360 exclusive beside Halo. In fact, Halo is the only game that sells exceptionally well on the 360. I guess 360 fanboys only know how to do two things, that's troll, and gobble up only mindles shooters on the xbox. All in all, those 3 xbots fail in typical M$ fashion. The_game21x, Staicontv, miketheman83, take your ignorant, stupid, and WRONG opinions else where. IF we can even call what you three have an opinion,LOL xbots

I see mutliplats for the PS3, and is;t this Brofitst? He get suspended or something?
#273 Posted by themajormayor (25667 posts) -
[QUOTE="Speedzilla"]

[QUOTE="Speedzilla"]

TC made a fool out of himself :lol:

Miketheman83

Agreed 100%

I gave you guys a post with factual information. So far the only argument PS3 fans have is "um, um the TC is an idiot he got owned". You guys are morons, seriously.

I don't trust your counting
#274 Posted by lild1425 (6757 posts) -

[QUOTE="lild1425"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Hey Mike, why don't you annualize the numbers, since the Xbox360 has been out for a year and a half longer? When you annualize them, it becomes: 360 90 or higher - 6.7 360 80 or higher - 42.3 360 75 or higher - 33.1 PS3 90 or higher - 7.5 PS3 80 or higher - 46.5 PS3 75 or higher - 28.7 So the PS3 actually wins in 80+ and 90+.The_Game21x

Brace Yourselves. Game21 aka the "fact" Nazi is coming.

Already...arrived.

And feel free to actually prove me wrong with facts rather than your fanboy nonsense. Any time now. :)

You call me a fanboy, yet half my library consists of Xbox games and have admitted a slight Xbox bias.  Since I don't know personally know anyone, I don't like to make outrageous claims, but I am calling you into suspect with your PDZ avatar.

#275 Posted by Primordialous (1276 posts) -

Because they are weaboo freaks that play games like this

NI-NO-KUNI-80312-06.jpg

720OwnsPS4

lol.

#276 Posted by Speedzilla (1756 posts) -

[QUOTE="Speedzilla"]

[QUOTE="Speedzilla"]

TC made a fool out of himself :lol:

Miketheman83

Agreed 100%

I gave you guys a post with factual information. So far the only argument PS3 fans have is "um, um the TC is an idiot he got owned". You guys are morons, seriously.

Wait...wat? You didn't have any factual posts. You're delusional if you think that.

You got owned multiple times, lad. Don't make things up.

#277 Posted by Miketheman83 (3156 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Hey Mike, why don't you annualize the numbers, since the Xbox360 has been out for a year and a half longer? When you annualize them, it becomes: 360 90 or higher - 6.7 360 80 or higher - 42.3 360 75 or higher - 33.1 PS3 90 or higher - 7.5 PS3 80 or higher - 46.5 PS3 75 or higher - 28.7 So the PS3 actually wins in 80+ and 90+.lild1425

How is it fair to throw out games from the 360's launch just because it launched earlier than the PS3? :?

I don't think you understand what that calculation is. Nothing is 'thrown out'.

Like I've said a million times....numbers and statistics can be manipulated to fit any agenda. Anyone that has passed 8th grade can tell you this.

There is no manipulation going on here lol. Im telling you straight up " the 360 has 617 high rated games and the PS3 has 496", WHICH IS A CLEAR ADVANTAGE FOR 360 OWNERS NO MATTER HOW YOU TRY TO SPIN IT.
#278 Posted by lild1425 (6757 posts) -

[QUOTE="Speedzilla"]

[QUOTE="Speedzilla"]

TC made a fool out of himself :lol:

Miketheman83

Agreed 100%

I gave you guys a post with factual information. So far the only argument PS3 fans have is "um, um the TC is an idiot he got owned". You guys are morons, seriously.

Again...no source work from the author of this topic. The burden of proof still lies with the TC.

#279 Posted by chessmaster1989 (29056 posts) -

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Hey Mike, why don't you annualize the numbers, since the Xbox360 has been out for a year and a half longer? When you annualize them, it becomes: 360 90 or higher - 6.7 360 80 or higher - 42.3 360 75 or higher - 33.1 PS3 90 or higher - 7.5 PS3 80 or higher - 46.5 PS3 75 or higher - 28.7 So the PS3 actually wins in 80+ and 90+.The_Game21x

How is it fair to throw out games from the 360's launch just because it launched earlier than the PS3? :?

I'm not throwing out games. I'm saying that the annualized metric (how many 90+, 80+, 75+ games PER YEAR) is correct because it accounts for the fact that the 360 has been out longer.
#280 Posted by The_Game21x (26342 posts) -

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="lild1425"]

Brace Yourselves. Game21 aka the "fact" Nazi is coming.

lild1425

Already...arrived.

And feel free to actually prove me wrong with facts rather than your fanboy nonsense. Any time now. :)

You call me a fanboy, yet half my library consists of Xbox games and have admitted a slight Xbox bias.  Since I don't know personally know anyone, I don't like to make outrageous claims, but I am calling you into suspect with your PDZ avatar.

Perfect Dark (N64) is one of my favorite games of all time. Perfect Dark Zero has better art. Therefore, I used PDZ art to make my avatar and sig.

And I'm calling you a fanboy because you say dumb things like "There's absolutely no way any self respecting person can seriously say the 360 library is better. It's not even close. "

Because heaven forbid someone have a difference of opinion from you. :roll:

#281 Posted by Miketheman83 (3156 posts) -

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="Speedzilla"]

Agreed 100%

Speedzilla

I gave you guys a post with factual information. So far the only argument PS3 fans have is "um, um the TC is an idiot he got owned". You guys are morons, seriously.

Wait...wat? You didn't have any factual posts. You're delusional if you think that.

You got owned multiple times, lad. Don't make things up.

Did you just read someones post saying I got owned and assume it was true? Because there is no possible way to "own" someone who presents factual information. I counted all the games on Metacritic and presented the proof. The 360 has hundreds more high rated games based on fact. Im waiting for you to tell me why my original post is not accurate.

#282 Posted by whiskeystrike (12068 posts) -

Proof of subjectivity?

Alright

#283 Posted by Speedzilla (1756 posts) -

[QUOTE="Speedzilla"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] I gave you guys a post with factual information. So far the only argument PS3 fans have is "um, um the TC is an idiot he got owned". You guys are morons, seriously.Miketheman83

Wait...wat? You didn't have any factual posts. You're delusional if you think that.

You got owned multiple times, lad. Don't make things up.

Did you just read someones post saying I got owned and assume it was true? Because there is no possible way to "own" someone who presents factual information. I counted all the games on Metacritic and presented the proof. The 350 has hundreds more high rated games based on fact. Im waiting for you to tell me why my original post is not accurate.

You presented no factual information. Take some pointers from themajormayor or tomentos and actually post factually.

You sir, are delusional.

#284 Posted by Miketheman83 (3156 posts) -
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Hey Mike, why don't you annualize the numbers, since the Xbox360 has been out for a year and a half longer? When you annualize them, it becomes: 360 90 or higher - 6.7 360 80 or higher - 42.3 360 75 or higher - 33.1 PS3 90 or higher - 7.5 PS3 80 or higher - 46.5 PS3 75 or higher - 28.7 So the PS3 actually wins in 80+ and 90+.chessmaster1989

How is it fair to throw out games from the 360's launch just because it launched earlier than the PS3? :?

I'm not throwing out games. I'm saying that the annualized metric (how many 90+, 80+, 75+ games PER YEAR) is correct because it accounts for the fact that the 360 has been out longer.

It doesnt matter if the 360 has been out ten years longer, that wouldnt stop the fact that it has the most critically acclaimed game library. Say for instance I had more money than you. Would you say my money doesnt count because I started earning it a year earlier than you? No, it wouldnt matter because I still have more money than you and that is an advantage for me.
#285 Posted by Miketheman83 (3156 posts) -

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="Speedzilla"]

Wait...wat? You didn't have any factual posts. You're delusional if you think that.

You got owned multiple times, lad. Don't make things up.

Speedzilla

Did you just read someones post saying I got owned and assume it was true? Because there is no possible way to "own" someone who presents factual information. I counted all the games on Metacritic and presented the proof. The 350 has hundreds more high rated games based on fact. Im waiting for you to tell me why my original post is not accurate.

You presented no factual information. Take some pointers from themajormayor or tomentos and actually post factually.

You sir, are delusional.

Are you trying to tell me the PS3 has more high rated games than the 360? Im not really seeing your argument. If the PS3 has more high rated games prove it.
#286 Posted by lild1425 (6757 posts) -

Mike. Reevaluate yourself man.

Give us the breakdown. You can't just throw a bunch of numbers and claim it as fact. Where is the calculation and breakdown? I really don't want to spend time to do my own. You still haven't even considered this.

#287 Posted by Decko5 (9420 posts) -
I haven't been in System Wars for like 5 years. Glad to see everyone is still as immature as ever.
#288 Posted by lild1425 (6757 posts) -

[QUOTE="Speedzilla"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] Did you just read someones post saying I got owned and assume it was true? Because there is no possible way to "own" someone who presents factual information. I counted all the games on Metacritic and presented the proof. The 350 has hundreds more high rated games based on fact. Im waiting for you to tell me why my original post is not accurate.Miketheman83

You presented no factual information. Take some pointers from themajormayor or tomentos and actually post factually.

You sir, are delusional.

Are you trying to tell me the PS3 has more high rated games than the 360? Im not really seeing your argument. If the PS3 has more high rated games prove it.

WE ARE ALL SAYING YOU HAVEN'T PROVEN IT. Where is your source work? How did you arrive at this calculation?

#289 Posted by StaticOnTV (583 posts) -
The main flaw is that one needs to remove the obvious fanboy sites. Sites that do not review all platformers or at least not focus on only one platform (unless official XBOX or PS3 magazine) should not be counted. The ones that are obvious can AT LEAST be removed. Observe: Halo 3, which if not mistaken is the highest rating 360 exclusive on metacritic, has 15 OBVIOUS fanboy sites, among others that may also be or may not be: http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-3/critic-reviews Unahrted 2 for PS3, Has like 19, http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/uncharted-2-among-thieves/critic-reviews The main issues is both have random websites biased or only reviewing for one platoform, or random blogs or something or random crap websites that MC accepts as long as it does not look like the site you made is not made with MSpaint. Some of the sites on the Uncharted link are down right obvious. and single review sites that are NAMED after their biased platform are ACCEPTED? Yeah ok.
#290 Posted by Miketheman83 (3156 posts) -

Mike. Reevaluate yourself man.

Give us the breakdown. You can't just throw a bunch of numbers and claim it as fact. Where is the calculation and breakdown? I really don't want to spend time to do my own. You still haven't even considered this.

lild1425
What is so hard to understand about the original post? I counted the games for the 360 and PS3 that were above 75 on Metacritic. The 360 had more in the 90+ range, more in the 80+ range and more in the 75+ range. Its not rocket science dude. I do know why it is so hard for you guys to comprehend such simple information.
#291 Posted by lild1425 (6757 posts) -

I haven't been in System Wars for like 5 years. Glad to see everyone is still as immature as ever. Decko5

I've been dormant for awhile and returned today and I know why I had to take a break. I admit I keep getting sucked in to the immaturity. It's just the logic people employ here is beyond scary that it is frustrating.

#292 Posted by Speedzilla (1756 posts) -

[QUOTE="Speedzilla"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] Did you just read someones post saying I got owned and assume it was true? Because there is no possible way to "own" someone who presents factual information. I counted all the games on Metacritic and presented the proof. The 350 has hundreds more high rated games based on fact. Im waiting for you to tell me why my original post is not accurate.Miketheman83

You presented no factual information. Take some pointers from themajormayor or tomentos and actually post factually.

You sir, are delusional.

Are you trying to tell me the PS3 has more high rated games than the 360? Im not really seeing your argument. If the PS3 has more high rated games prove it.

You haven't proven anything. So before I prove anything, you prove it first, lad.

#293 Posted by whiskeystrike (12068 posts) -

Wait does the 360 have a higher rated library or a better library?

One is factual

One is subjective

#294 Posted by Bigboi500 (29053 posts) -

 

Because they are weaboo freaks that play games like this

NI-NO-KUNI-80312-06.jpg

720OwnsPS4

You're a total flippin' idiot, aren't you? That's ok, I'm sure you'll be banned soon enough.

#295 Posted by Miketheman83 (3156 posts) -

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="Speedzilla"]

You presented no factual information. Take some pointers from themajormayor or tomentos and actually post factually.

You sir, are delusional.

Speedzilla

Are you trying to tell me the PS3 has more high rated games than the 360? Im not really seeing your argument. If the PS3 has more high rated games prove it.

You haven't proven anything. So before I prove anything, you prove it first, lad.

Have you never used Metacritic? The truth is all there for everybody to see. I just did the work for you guys. The original post is 100% accurate I assure you. If you dont believe me go look for yourself, its not exactly top secret information.
#296 Posted by Miketheman83 (3156 posts) -

Wait does the 360 have a higher rated library or a better library?

One is factual

One is subjective

whiskeystrike
I think most rational people would agree that the most high rated game library is usually the "best", unless your opinion goes against the majority, which is fine.
#297 Posted by lild1425 (6757 posts) -

[QUOTE="lild1425"]

Mike. Reevaluate yourself man.

Give us the breakdown. You can't just throw a bunch of numbers and claim it as fact. Where is the calculation and breakdown? I really don't want to spend time to do my own. You still haven't even considered this.

Miketheman83

What is so hard to understand about the original post? I counted the games for the 360 and PS3 that were above 75 on Metacritic. The 360 had more in the 90+ range, more in the 80+ range and more in the 75+ range. Its not rocket science dude. I do know why it is so hard for you guys to comprehend such simple information.

Aha! So you haven't considered the fanboy sites? Was this strictly retail or did you also add in Arcade games? Did you doublecount Special Editions? There are many reasons why I want to know how you arrived at your numbers. Metacritic isn't run by God.

As I've been saying, the results are probably unbelievably skewed. With Meta, you can't just do a simple count and make a claim like that.

#298 Posted by Speedzilla (1756 posts) -

[QUOTE="Speedzilla"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] Are you trying to tell me the PS3 has more high rated games than the 360? Im not really seeing your argument. If the PS3 has more high rated games prove it.Miketheman83

You haven't proven anything. So before I prove anything, you prove it first, lad.

Have you never used Metacritic? The truth is all there for everybody to see. I just did the work for you guys. The original post is 100% accurate I assure you. If you dont believe me go look for yourself, its not exactly top secret information.

Ah, so you have no proof. I win this debate.

In the future, be more factually, plz.

#299 Posted by chessmaster1989 (29056 posts) -
[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

How is it fair to throw out games from the 360's launch just because it launched earlier than the PS3? :?

Miketheman83
I'm not throwing out games. I'm saying that the annualized metric (how many 90+, 80+, 75+ games PER YEAR) is correct because it accounts for the fact that the 360 has been out longer.

It doesnt matter if the 360 has been out ten years longer, that wouldnt stop the fact that it has the most critically acclaimed game library. Say for instance I had more money than you. Would you say my money doesnt count because I started earning it a year earlier than you? No, it wouldnt matter because I still have more money than you and that is an advantage for me.

If you have more money than I do but I have higher annual earnings, then soon enough I'm going to have more money than you.
#300 Posted by brofists (2185 posts) -
LOL at the back catalog of the 360 That catalog consists mostly of the many boring iterations Gears,Halo, and Forza lol... A majority of the 360's early "exclusives," which make up a large part of the 360's library later apprared on the PS3 or PC too: Like Bioshock,Dead Rising, Full Auto,Lost Planet, Gears 1, Alan Wake ect There is also the fact that the 360's "back catalog" is inflated by old PS2 ports from early this gen, old sports titles from early this gen, and a grip of xbl titles and kinect titles that not even the most delusional of lemmings would even care about! LOL i mean what a great "back catalogue" in where-well over 80% of the games in the 360's library(multi plats) are ALSO available on the PS3 Yep, what a great "back catalogue" indeed eh! The PS3 has so many more and better core games that matter to core gamers, then the 360, that its not even funny. The PS3's catalogue isn't about numbers, like the library of the 360 is, its about substance and quality. In 2011 alone the PS3 CRUSHED the 360 in quantity, in quality, and in diversity of exclusives, and its been that way since before and after, that especially will be the case for this year too! I seriously feel sorry for the lembots, They should have went with a PS3 to catch up on its amazing and diverse back catalogue. Not only that, but with a PS3 you would've gotten a capable blue ray player, and free online. Now their going to have to fork over 60$ of their mommys hard earned money a year just in order to play bacic online play over XBL. The 360 is going to end up costing way more in the long term then a PS3 would have, all the while you are left out of all the awesome exclusives on the PS3 to play. I guess have fun playing Seaseme Street Kinect on the 720 lems! That and the fact they have no games to play, its driven xbots on here insane