The graphic are pretty damned good for 2006 hardware.
Agreed but lots of cows were outright saying it could be a contender for best looking game of all time and matched up with stuff like Crysis 3 and Witcher 2. Oh and another thing, Witcher 2 looks nowhere as good as it's hyped up to be if you ask me. Also runs very poorly for how it looks.
Now I didn't believe them but I expected it to at least look good most of the time...
The Witcher 2 is a gorgeous game and it runs flawlessly at max settings for me, what didn't you like about it's graphics?.
I agree TW2 looks great, but he's right about it running terrible for what you get. You run it flawlessly at max settings because your system is overkill beyond overkill for TW2. On lower end systems though (even when they still easily exceed the game's "minimum" or even "recommended" specs), it runs like complete ass. I tried TW2 on my laptop, which exceeds all the minimum requirements, but not by much. I didn't expect it to run well, but I should definitely have been able to manage 30ish fps at mostly low settings. Got 5-12 fps max, at bare minimum settings. That is, every single option at "off" or the lowest it can go, and 800x600 res. At those settings, it looks absolutely terrible, and I've run dozens of games looking far better than that, and got 50+ fps.