Vanishing Of Ethan Carter for PC photoreleastic graphics

  • 99 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for zeeshanhaider
#51 Posted by zeeshanhaider (5280 posts) -

Far from being photo realistic and not that I want my games to look like one. But it does look fantastic.

Avatar image for Epak_
#52 Posted by Epak_ (8837 posts) -

@TheFadeForever: Very interesting stuff, thanks for the link!

Avatar image for voljin1987
#53 Posted by voljin1987 (970 posts) -

that first screen shot.. is that really a screenshot? holy shit

Avatar image for Cloud_imperium
#54 Edited by Cloud_imperium (14151 posts) -

@zeeshanhaider said:

Far from being photo realistic and not that I want my games to look like one. But it does look fantastic.

Using full detail was taking a lot of space so they lowered it a little bit because they said that "World is not ready for 1 Terra bytes of games" but it still looks awesome . The game is still in development , so lightening effects here are just place holder and will be improved in the final build . Textures on other hand are looking insane .

Avatar image for steamistrash
#55 Posted by steamistrash (431 posts) -

the graphics arent impressive, it's more about gameplay anyway.

people too worried about graphics now instead of non casual shitty gameplay.

Avatar image for murray69murray
#56 Posted by murray69murray (127 posts) -

My eyes have a hard time accepting that it's just a game. I'll wait for some gameplay and then I'll judge.

Avatar image for Master_ShakeXXX
#58 Posted by Master_ShakeXXX (13361 posts) -

It looks okay. Nothing on par with Infamous Second Son tho.

Avatar image for lostrib
#59 Posted by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@Master_ShakeXXX said:

It looks okay. Nothing on par with Infamous Second Son tho.

lol

Avatar image for kingtito
#60 Posted by kingtito (7843 posts) -

@Master_ShakeXXX said:

It looks okay. Nothing on par with Infamous Second Son tho.

Serious?

Avatar image for melonfarmerz
#61 Posted by melonfarmerz (1294 posts) -

@Master_ShakeXXX said:

It looks okay. Nothing on par with Infamous Second Son tho.

If you're serious, this is why we call console gamers just plain ignorant. If not, congrats on fooling three people, including me.

Avatar image for FLOPPAGE_50
#62 Posted by FLOPPAGE_50 (2519 posts) -

@Master_ShakeXXX said:

It looks okay. Nothing on par with Infamous Second Son tho.

has to be trolling

Avatar image for kinectthedots
#63 Edited by kinectthedots (3383 posts) -

@Motokid6 said:

Thanks for trashing the thread kinectthedots. Jerkoff. Cant just appreciate whats being shown here?

Lol, the way you talk, you'd think I'd have said something bad about the game or something. I was just yanking hermit's chain with their, "that's why I am a PC gamer" nonsense.

Despite you thinking I am a "jerkoff" everything I stated was built on a solid foundation of facts and logic. Hermits are the ones who went apeshit because they couldn't deal with it, I just defended my original point, with was never actually deflected with any of the counter arguments.

Check the last response to my messages. I left the hermit who replied, desperately constructing an argument to an issue I wasn't even debating (PC being able to produce better graphics than consoles), alone and let his post stand.

like most fanboys, hermits say they the didn't hype and say things after the fact when their predictions failed. I pointed out that hermits said Crysis, The Witcher 2 and Metro were not possible on consoles and they reply with, "no one in the thread is saying that",

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/system-wars-314159282/witcher-2-is-a-pc-exlclusive-27425517/

I was pointing out that the arguments had been made.

My point here is that right in this thread hermits are saying current consoles couldn't do this game. I do appreciate what is shown here though I am not blown away. PC's probably could have already done a game like this a long time ago but with a new generation everyone has updated tech so a game like this is more plausible, that includes a range that adaptable on consoles i.e. PS4.

I don't hype games without gameplay though so what's being shown here means little to nothing to me right now, but it does look nice.

Avatar image for Jankarcop
#64 Posted by Jankarcop (11056 posts) -

@kinectthedots said:
. Many "PC counterparts" fall short of the console version of mutiplatform games now. There is no standard setting for PC which is part of what makes PC great, but at the same time it is also part of what holds it back.

@kinectthedots said:
@crimsonxx said:

I played many games but few manage to even come close to that level of photo realism this is absolutely incredible. Glad I stuck to pc gaming =)

No need for a PC to play this. Any good game that PC gets that's not RTS or MMO strategy will be on consoles this gen, or at least PS4.

Herms need to accept this fact and stop kidding themselves. lol at the, that's why I game on PC comments when most of what hermits use their PC for is to mod multiplatform games.

1. Most multiplats are best on PC. There are very very few that are better on consoles. You're straight up lying on the first quote. Even GS says its "90%"

2. Last gen, and this gen, PC has more aaa+aa exclusives than all 3 systems combined. This spans several genres. The second quote was factually untrue and a lie.

Avatar image for kinectthedots
#66 Posted by kinectthedots (3383 posts) -

@Motokid6 said:

@kinectthedots: And then you go and type paragraphs.. your a jerkoff troll who shit in a perfectly trolless thread that was about the tech. But, no you had to add in your complete bullshit. Thanks now its just another crap, fanboy thread.

Okay.

Avatar image for kinectthedots
#67 Edited by kinectthedots (3383 posts) -

@Jankarcop said:

@kinectthedots said:
. Many "PC counterparts" fall short of the console version of mutiplatform games now. There is no standard setting for PC which is part of what makes PC great, but at the same time it is also part of what holds it back.

@kinectthedots said:
@crimsonxx said:

I played many games but few manage to even come close to that level of photo realism this is absolutely incredible. Glad I stuck to pc gaming =)

No need for a PC to play this. Any good game that PC gets that's not RTS or MMO strategy will be on consoles this gen, or at least PS4.

Herms need to accept this fact and stop kidding themselves. lol at the, that's why I game on PC comments when most of what hermits use their PC for is to mod multiplatform games.

1. Most multiplats are best on PC. There are very very few that are better on consoles. You're straight up lying on the first quote. Even GS says its "90%"

2. Last gen, and this gen, PC has more aaa+aa exclusives than all 3 systems combined. This spans several genres. The second quote was factually untrue and a lie.

1. PC isn't a standardized platform that fact alone kills your entire first point.

This is Crysis 3 on PC @ 720p, low detail, medium textures lol...where is the "PC standard" even at this low requirement?

It looks like a bunch of different settings for a bunch of different PC set ups to me, nothing standard about it. LOL herm smashed and point proven, next.

2. Most big exclusives PC games that hermits claimed as impossible on console, (Crysis, Far Cry, Witcher 2, Metro) that were not RTS or MMO strategy and turned out good, ended up on consoles.

FACT. Those were the games hermits bragged about last gen because consolites didn't care about the RTS and such. You bringing up all the AAA+AA titles means nothing because hermits never hyped them since we all know the majority of those were small indie games that didn't support the hermit argument for their powerful PCs.

Sorry if these facts hurt your feeling but I am afraid you are going to have to..

Avatar image for ronvalencia
#68 Edited by ronvalencia (20608 posts) -

@kinectthedots said:

@Jankarcop said:

@kinectthedots said:
. Many "PC counterparts" fall short of the console version of mutiplatform games now. There is no standard setting for PC which is part of what makes PC great, but at the same time it is also part of what holds it back.

@kinectthedots said:
@crimsonxx said:

I played many games but few manage to even come close to that level of photo realism this is absolutely incredible. Glad I stuck to pc gaming =)

No need for a PC to play this. Any good game that PC gets that's not RTS or MMO strategy will be on consoles this gen, or at least PS4.

Herms need to accept this fact and stop kidding themselves. lol at the, that's why I game on PC comments when most of what hermits use their PC for is to mod multiplatform games.

1. Most multiplats are best on PC. There are very very few that are better on consoles. You're straight up lying on the first quote. Even GS says its "90%"

2. Last gen, and this gen, PC has more aaa+aa exclusives than all 3 systems combined. This spans several genres. The second quote was factually untrue and a lie.

1. PC isn't a standardized platform that fact alone kills your entire first point.

This is Crysis 3 on PC @ 720p, low detail, medium textures lol...where is the "PC standard" even at this low requirement?

It looks like a bunch of different settings for a bunch of different PC set ups to me, nothing standard about it. LOL herm smashed and point proven, next.

2. Most big exclusives PC games that hermits claimed as impossible on console, (Crysis, Far Cry, Witcher 2, Metro) that were not RTS or MMO strategy and turned out good, ended up on consoles.

FACT. Those were the games hermits bragged about last gen because consolites didn't care about the RTS and such. You bringing up all the AAA+AA titles means nothing because hermits never hyped them since we all know the majority of those were small indie games that didn't support the hermit argument for their powerful PCs.

Sorry if these facts hurt your feeling but I am afraid you are going to have to..

Sony's client platforms are Vita, PS3 and PS4.

Microsoft's Windows X86 client platform scales from 8 inch tablets to high-end gaming PCs.

Like PS4, AMD is selling most of their R9-2xx class GPUs.

Avatar image for TheFadeForever
#69 Edited by TheFadeForever (2615 posts) -

@kinectthedots:

lol benchmarks? How many people play Crysis 3 on those setting with those set ups?

Metro was never a pc exclusive and lol Far Cry you realize the one on console was made by a complete different developer and was not like the one on PC it was in fact inferior .

Avatar image for lostrib
#70 Posted by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@TheFadeForever said:

@kinectthedots:

lol benchmarks? How many people play Crysis 3 on those setting with those set ups?

Metro was never a pc exclusive and lol Far Cry you realize the one on console was made by a complete different developer and it wasn't the same as the one PC.

why are you guys even engaging him?

Avatar image for Jankarcop
#71 Edited by Jankarcop (11056 posts) -

@kinectthedots said:

@Jankarcop said:

@kinectthedots said:
. Many "PC counterparts" fall short of the console version of mutiplatform games now. There is no standard setting for PC which is part of what makes PC great, but at the same time it is also part of what holds it back.

@kinectthedots said:
@crimsonxx said:

I played many games but few manage to even come close to that level of photo realism this is absolutely incredible. Glad I stuck to pc gaming =)

No need for a PC to play this. Any good game that PC gets that's not RTS or MMO strategy will be on consoles this gen, or at least PS4.

Herms need to accept this fact and stop kidding themselves. lol at the, that's why I game on PC comments when most of what hermits use their PC for is to mod multiplatform games.

1. Most multiplats are best on PC. There are very very few that are better on consoles. You're straight up lying on the first quote. Even GS says its "90%"

2. Last gen, and this gen, PC has more aaa+aa exclusives than all 3 systems combined. This spans several genres. The second quote was factually untrue and a lie.

A bunch of Bullshit

You didn't refute my 2 factual points. Please stop going off-topic.

Prove this data is incorrect:

http://systemwarsmagazine.com/gamespot-reviews-spreadsheet/

If our standard of comparison for PC games was "the console version," the PC version would get a higher score than the others over 90% of the time -GS

Avatar image for blangenakker
#72 Posted by blangenakker (3176 posts) -

@TheFadeForever: Because you know, they never do. But I'm just cynical like that.

Avatar image for kinectthedots
#73 Edited by kinectthedots (3383 posts) -

@Jankarcop said:

@kinectthedots said:

@Jankarcop said:

@kinectthedots said:
. Many "PC counterparts" fall short of the console version of mutiplatform games now. There is no standard setting for PC which is part of what makes PC great, but at the same time it is also part of what holds it back.

@kinectthedots said:
@crimsonxx said:

I played many games but few manage to even come close to that level of photo realism this is absolutely incredible. Glad I stuck to pc gaming =)

No need for a PC to play this. Any good game that PC gets that's not RTS or MMO strategy will be on consoles this gen, or at least PS4.

Herms need to accept this fact and stop kidding themselves. lol at the, that's why I game on PC comments when most of what hermits use their PC for is to mod multiplatform games.

1. Most multiplats are best on PC. There are very very few that are better on consoles. You're straight up lying on the first quote. Even GS says its "90%"

2. Last gen, and this gen, PC has more aaa+aa exclusives than all 3 systems combined. This spans several genres. The second quote was factually untrue and a lie.

A bunch of Bullshit

You didn't refute my 2 factual points. Please stop going off-topic.

Prove this data is incorrect:

http://systemwarsmagazine.com/gamespot-reviews-spreadsheet/

If our standard of comparison for PC games was "the console version," the PC version would get a higher score than the others over 90% of the time -GS

Everything you guys have said is redundant and or not addressing the original points I brought up. I destroyed your points. It's obvious you are in no no no fanboy mode and will keep going forever no matter what.

No one cares about your data,using indie games which has nothing to do with my argument, damage control in full force here. You need to either re-read the original post to grasp an understanding of what is being discusses here or butt out all together because you are the one who is off-topic here bringing up that chart as some kind of point.

Let me make it easier for you so you can stop running into a wall here. I am talking about graphically impressive games that were hyped by hermits as only possible on PC that were not not RTS or MMO strategy, which actually turned out to be good games. Games that actually got hype threads and vocal hype from hermits about graphics ect.

I guess it is common for hermit to ramble in incoherent and redundant patterns over and over since they are not used to actually accounting for the failed arguments they have made in the past.

You can argue against what I say all day but the previous hermit claims of Crysis, Witcher 2 ect, "not possible on consoles" failed despite all the technical ramblings of PC know-it-all's from people like you and other PC fanboys.

You sensitive hermits took my post to heart despite me not saying that the game would be bad or that it would be better than what a high end PC could do. All factors point to almost any good traditional game that hits PC, eventually coming to consoles this generation. Look at what happened to Crysis, The Witcher 2 and Diablo III last gen. Absolutely nothing is outrageous about my observation.

The fact that crysis 3 (currently the most demanding PC game available) is on PS3 and xbox360 and runs quite well, no one should even question the possibility of PS4 running any PC game in the foreseeable future. Knowing what last gen consoles were able to accomplish with 8 year old hardware, very fact that some hermits are suggesting that PS4 couldn't run a band new PC game for this generation is hilarious.

It will be fun to visit this thread in a year or two to have a good laugh and see how it all panned out.

Avatar image for Jankarcop
#74 Posted by Jankarcop (11056 posts) -

@kinectthedots said:

@Jankarcop said:

@kinectthedots said:

@Jankarcop said:

@kinectthedots said:
. Many "PC counterparts" fall short of the console version of mutiplatform games now. There is no standard setting for PC which is part of what makes PC great, but at the same time it is also part of what holds it back.

@kinectthedots said:
@crimsonxx said:

I played many games but few manage to even come close to that level of photo realism this is absolutely incredible. Glad I stuck to pc gaming =)

No need for a PC to play this. Any good game that PC gets that's not RTS or MMO strategy will be on consoles this gen, or at least PS4.

Herms need to accept this fact and stop kidding themselves. lol at the, that's why I game on PC comments when most of what hermits use their PC for is to mod multiplatform games.

1. Most multiplats are best on PC. There are very very few that are better on consoles. You're straight up lying on the first quote. Even GS says its "90%"

2. Last gen, and this gen, PC has more aaa+aa exclusives than all 3 systems combined. This spans several genres. The second quote was factually untrue and a lie.

A bunch of Bullshit

You didn't refute my 2 factual points. Please stop going off-topic.

Prove this data is incorrect:

http://systemwarsmagazine.com/gamespot-reviews-spreadsheet/

If our standard of comparison for PC games was "the console version," the PC version would get a higher score than the others over 90% of the time -GS

Bullshit

Ofcourse it might end up on conosles, but like other PC titles it'll be reduced to shit.

The life of a console gamer. Shitty multiplats and very few exclusives.

Avatar image for Cloud_imperium
#76 Edited by Cloud_imperium (14151 posts) -

@kinectthedots said:

@Motokid6 said:

Thanks for trashing the thread kinectthedots. Jerkoff. Cant just appreciate whats being shown here?

Lol, the way you talk, you'd think I'd have said something bad about the game or something. I was just yanking hermit's chain with their, "that's why I am a PC gamer" nonsense.

Despite you thinking I am a "jerkoff" everything I stated was built on a solid foundation of facts and logic. Hermits are the ones who went apeshit because they couldn't deal with it, I just defended my original point, with was never actually deflected with any of the counter arguments.

Check the last response to my messages. I left the hermit who replied, desperately constructing an argument to an issue I wasn't even debating (PC being able to produce better graphics than consoles), alone and let his post stand.

like most fanboys, hermits say they the didn't hype and say things after the fact when their predictions failed. I pointed out that hermits said Crysis, The Witcher 2 and Metro were not possible on consoles and they reply with, "no one in the thread is saying that",

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/system-wars-314159282/witcher-2-is-a-pc-exlclusive-27425517/

I was pointing out that the arguments had been made.

My point here is that right in this thread hermits are saying current consoles couldn't do this game. I do appreciate what is shown here though I am not blown away. PC's probably could have already done a game like this a long time ago but with a new generation everyone has updated tech so a game like this is more plausible, that includes a range that adaptable on consoles i.e. PS4.

I don't hype games without gameplay though so what's being shown here means little to nothing to me right now, but it does look nice.

They re-wrote the entire engine for Witcher 2 to make it possible to run on xbox 360 . The game looks like Minecraft on xbox when compared with PC . Worse than lowest settings possible on PC . And it is not even 720p .

Avatar image for GhoX
#77 Posted by GhoX (6237 posts) -

That first shot looks very very realistic. I would not have thought it's computer-generated if the topic didn't tell me about it.

Avatar image for KillzoneSnake
#78 Edited by KillzoneSnake (2065 posts) -

PC gamers play tech demos? lol

The first game to be shown with true gameplay that looks near CGI was The Order, only on PS4 :)

Avatar image for Cloud_imperium
#79 Edited by Cloud_imperium (14151 posts) -

@KillzoneSnake said:

PC gamers play tech demos? lol

The first game to be shown with true gameplay that looks near CGI was The Order, only on PS4 :)

Order 1886 have terrible textures and it is linear as hell . Vanishing of Ethan Carter is open world game .

Avatar image for Wiimotefan
#80 Edited by Wiimotefan (4150 posts) -

@edinsftw said:

@bloodytides: Yea, its pretty easy with zbrush, modo, or mari. You just have to make sure the pictures have even lighting for tiling and are high enough resolution.

Well unfortunately not Zbrush as it has no 'physical' camera for projection. Zbrush is good for cleaning up the results and bringing out lost details for normals/displacement though.

Max and Modo are excellent for this though and I'm sure Mari is probably up to snuff. Here in the next couple of months a friend and I will be doing a Zbrush Workshops class on this. He'll be showing how to get bad ass scans with a cheap camera and I'll be doing the remesh/cleanup part. We'll most likely be doing a Modo/Zbrush workflow after a quick run down on Agisoft.

First block will be doing a head, then some large environment pieces. Definitely keep an eye out for it, it's gonna be some cool stuff! :)

Avatar image for Wiimotefan
#81 Edited by Wiimotefan (4150 posts) -
@melonfarmerz said:

And implying your puny console could handle this on even 30fps 720p....

This is an asset creation technique, meant to be accurate while saving time. It looks impressive because it accounts for natural details that even the greatest 3d artist could not accomplish from scratch. VFX studios for TV and film have been doing this for years, but now it's affordable and we'll be seeing this in plenty of games across all kinds of platforms in the coming years.

A well built PC will always outperform a console of course, but that's not the point of this. These assets look great not because they're pushing some crazy specs, but because they weren't crafted from scratch by a 3d artist on a stiff deadline. Assets like this could (and will) be on consoles and they won't be anymore taxing on the hardware than assets built from scratch.

Ever since the start of last gen, digital sculpting became an integral part of many studios modeling/texturing pipelines. It was great because you could sculpt in millions of polygons worth of detail and then bake those details into a real time mesh. This is the exact same concept except now we're pulling those details directly from nature.

Sony is already investing big in these techniques for their first party btw.

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
#82 Posted by NFJSupreme (6310 posts) -

Console have come in here with their jelly I see. Don't worry guys I'm sure the ps6 will assets like this.

Avatar image for zeeshanhaider
#83 Posted by zeeshanhaider (5280 posts) -

@NFJSupreme said:

Console have come in here with their jelly I see. Don't worry guys I'm sure the ps6 will assets like this.

Only if Sony manages to survive until then. :D

Avatar image for psx_warrior
#84 Posted by psx_warrior (1754 posts) -
@kinectthedots said:

@melonfarmerz said:

@kinectthedots said:

@crimsonxx said:

I played many games but few manage to even come close to that level of photo realism this is absolutely incredible. Glad I stuck to pc gaming =)

lol, if the game is any good it will be on PS4. No need for a PC to play this. Any good game that PC gets that's not RTS or MMO strategy will be on consoles this gen, or at least PS4.

Herms need to accept this fact and stop kidding themselves. lol at the, that's why I game on PC comments when most of what hermits use their PC for is to mod multiplatform games.

I can name 10 PC games that are amazing that aren't on PS4 off the top of my head. And implying your puny console could handle this on even 30fps 720p.... You guys get like 10 exclusives a year. We get a few hundred. What consoles have to accept is that they're inferior. lol

lol, sticks and stones brother.

Ahh I have found memories of hemits claiming this same thing on games like Crysis, The Witcher 2 and Metro last gen. Isn't it funny how all those, too impossible for console, PC monsters ended up working quite well on those 8 year old systems when it was all said and done?

lol at you silly herms thinking the PS4 couldn't handle this now.

Well, ok, but the PS4 better be able to make the game look just as good as the PC version or what's the point of releasing it for the PS4? The whole point of the way they made the graphics is to make it look as photo realistic as possible. If they have to make any sacrifices on the PS4 then they don't need to release it on the system. As for your other arguments about Crysis, yeah, the game runs fine on PS3 and 360, basically medium settings. However, I have the game on both PC and 360, and I can tell you right now that the PC version just trashes the console version bar none, and you didn't take into account mods. Mods cause the PC version to further leave the console version completely behind.

Another point is you do realize that we can adjust the settings on our PC games to run perfectly on our machines, right? This is why the PC version of a game will always blow the console version completely away...well, most of the time. I will give you this one. The devs need to properly optimize the game for the PC in order for it to take full advantage of the power of the PC. Bad ports like GTA4 and CoD Ghosts show that even a strong PC may not run the game really well if the game is rushed. That being said, the PC is the place to truly play games on if you are so concerned about graphics.

Avatar image for edinsftw
#85 Posted by edinsftw (4244 posts) -

@Wiimotefan said:

@edinsftw said:

@bloodytides: Yea, its pretty easy with zbrush, modo, or mari. You just have to make sure the pictures have even lighting for tiling and are high enough resolution.

Well unfortunately not Zbrush as it has no 'physical' camera for projection. Zbrush is good for cleaning up the results and bringing out lost details for normals/displacement though.

Max and Modo are excellent for this though and I'm sure Mari is probably up to snuff. Here in the next couple of months a friend and I will be doing a Zbrush Workshops class on this. He'll be showing how to get bad ass scans with a cheap camera and I'll be doing the remesh/cleanup part. We'll most likely be doing a Modo/Zbrush workflow after a quick run down on Agisoft.

First block will be doing a head, then some large environment pieces. Definitely keep an eye out for it, it's gonna be some cool stuff! :)

Yea I hadn't actually looked into exactly how they did it, you can have the same results with zbrush with using different techniques, but is more time consuming. I do have to say I hate zbrush though there are too many specifics you need to know to use it and the UI is quite bad until you customize it along with many crashes. Modo, on the other hand is quite nice imo.

Avatar image for murray69murray
#86 Posted by murray69murray (127 posts) -

@Cloud_imperium said:

@KillzoneSnake said:

PC gamers play tech demos? lol

The first game to be shown with true gameplay that looks near CGI was The Order, only on PS4 :)

Order 1886 have terrible textures and it is linear as hell . Vanishing of Ethan Carter is open world game .

Like all console games, only the character models aren't shit, the rest is.

Avatar image for seanmcloughlin
#87 Posted by seanmcloughlin (38222 posts) -

It does look VERY nice in those shots, but photorealism is boring. It's bland and flat looking. I much prefer something like Infamous where you have a lot of colours and lights around the place making the image pop more.

Avatar image for DarthRamms
#88 Edited by DarthRamms (1117 posts) -

@seanmcloughlin:

I think the purpose of their art direction was to make it feel like the player wasn't just looking at mere game while playing

Avatar image for seanmcloughlin
#89 Posted by seanmcloughlin (38222 posts) -

@DarthRamms said:

@seanmcloughlin:

I think the purpose of their art direction was to make it feel like the player wasn't just looking at mere game while playing

Possibly and I'm sure it will work very well. Doesn't change the fact that I still think photorealism is boring to look at after a while.

Avatar image for Jankarcop
#90 Posted by Jankarcop (11056 posts) -

@KillzoneSnake said:

PC gamers play tech demos? lol

The first game to be shown with true gameplay that looks near CGI was The Order, only on PS4 :)

Calls open world game a tech demo.

Plays 4 hour long automated movies on Playstation.

Avatar image for EnergyAbsorber
#91 Posted by EnergyAbsorber (4959 posts) -

Look closer. Those screens look more like paintings than photo realism. But they still look very impressive. A game doesn't have to have photo realistic graphics to look impressive.

Avatar image for groowagon
#92 Edited by groowagon (4261 posts) -

@silversix_ said:

Dark Souls 3 with these graphics GO.

Avatar image for groowagon
#93 Posted by groowagon (4261 posts) -

@EnergyAbsorber said:

Look closer. Those screens look more like paintings than photo realism. But they still look very impressive. A game doesn't have to have photo realistic graphics to look impressive.

true that, but i'm also a geek who wants to see modern hardware and technology being pushed to the limits, and i love seeing more and more realistic graphics. that is also one of the reasons i'm a PC gamer, since PC is always in the forefront of that area. graphics don't make a game, obviously, but graphics can make a game better imo.

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
#94 Posted by NFJSupreme (6310 posts) -

@seanmcloughlin said:

@DarthRamms said:

@seanmcloughlin:

I think the purpose of their art direction was to make it feel like the player wasn't just looking at mere game while playing

Possibly and I'm sure it will work very well. Doesn't change the fact that I still think photorealism is boring to look at after a while.

i think battlefield strikes a perfect balance between photorealism and video game.

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
#95 Posted by AM-Gamer (8116 posts) -

@TheFadeForever: God herms are so desperate. Your excited about stale asset pics? For all you know they could be prerendered backgrounds with no interactivity. Anybody could do those visuals if that's the case.

Avatar image for TheFadeForever
#96 Edited by TheFadeForever (2615 posts) -

Yea asset that they said will be in the game they even showed the process on how they made them using what techniques I guess you didn't even read what I wrote or links posted go figure. Unless there proof that's nothing but baseless assumption stay butthurt.

@AM-Gamer said:

@TheFadeForever: God herms are so desperate. Your excited about stale asset pics? For all you know they could be prerendered backgrounds with no interactivity. Anybody could do those visuals if that's the case.

Avatar image for kinectthedots
#97 Posted by kinectthedots (3383 posts) -

@scatteh316 said:

And this is why I'm a Hermit :D

lol

Loading Video...

This is why I am a console game, I called this a long time ago. Hermits are delusional for sure thinking anything released that has potential to be good wont be on consoles of couldn't be made for them.

Avatar image for lostrib
#98 Posted by lostrib (49999 posts) -

@kinectthedots said:

@scatteh316 said:

And this is why I'm a Hermit :D

lol

This is why I am a console game, I called this a long time ago. Hermits are delusional for sure thinking anything released that has potential to be good wont be on consoles of couldn't be made for them.

Don't bump old shit just because you're butthurt

Avatar image for CrownKingArthur
#99 Posted by CrownKingArthur (5262 posts) -

well he made that post 4.5 months ago which means that for 4.5 months he's known that the game he wants to play will come to the platform he plays on.

also, he plays at 1440p.

what did he do to you bro?